Cargando…

Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations

It is now well evidenced that wildlife crossing structures paired with exclusion fencing reduce wildlife vehicles collisions while facilitating wildlife connectivity across roadways. Managing animal mortality and subpopulation connectivity is crucial to successful species and landscape stewardship....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brennan, Liam, Chow, Emily, Lamb, Clayton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530405
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14371
_version_ 1784851032457609216
author Brennan, Liam
Chow, Emily
Lamb, Clayton
author_facet Brennan, Liam
Chow, Emily
Lamb, Clayton
author_sort Brennan, Liam
collection PubMed
description It is now well evidenced that wildlife crossing structures paired with exclusion fencing reduce wildlife vehicles collisions while facilitating wildlife connectivity across roadways. Managing animal mortality and subpopulation connectivity is crucial to successful species and landscape stewardship. Highway mitigation projects are large economic investments that remain on the landscape for many decades. Governments and planning agents thus strive to balance cost and benefit to build cost-effective structures with the greatest positive impact on local wildlife and motorists. Ideal dimensions of overpasses and underpasses vary by species, but scientists generally suggest that overpasses for large mammals should be approximately 50 m wide. Optimal width also depends on structure length, with longer structures requiring additional width. Accordingly, experts have suggested a width to length ratio of 0.8. We sought to assess how these recommendations manifested in practice—where agencies use this information to design and build structures while also balancing cost and logistical challenges—and the degree to which built structures conform to current recommendations. We identified 120 wildlife overpasses across the world that were constructed to reduce the negative impacts of roads. Using a novel measurement technique, we analyzed the dimensions of these 120 overpasses located in North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania. The average width of the wildlife overpasses was 34 m. Most wildlife overpasses located in North America and Europe did not meet their respective dimensional expert guidelines. We investigate reasons explaining the non-compliance and provide recommendations for future overpass designs. Building on previous evidence showing that wider overpasses have increased crossing rates, we examined crossing rates for multiple large mammal species across 12 overpasses located in western North America. We qualitatively observed that wider North American overpasses (40–60 m), in or near compliance with expert guidelines, were associated with a more diverse set of species use and had nearly twice the average crossing rates when compared to non-compliant, narrow North American overpasses. In reviewing various studies from around the world, we conclude that wide overpasses (~50 m) continue to present ecologically sound and cost-effective solutions for decreasing the barrier of roadways, especially when targeting width-sensitive species and large assemblages of mammals. Future studies, however, are encouraged to further explore the specific instances when underpasses and narrower overpasses present more cost-effective ecological solutions, or how these structures can complement wide overpasses in successful wildlife crossing systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9753749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97537492022-12-16 Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations Brennan, Liam Chow, Emily Lamb, Clayton PeerJ Biogeography It is now well evidenced that wildlife crossing structures paired with exclusion fencing reduce wildlife vehicles collisions while facilitating wildlife connectivity across roadways. Managing animal mortality and subpopulation connectivity is crucial to successful species and landscape stewardship. Highway mitigation projects are large economic investments that remain on the landscape for many decades. Governments and planning agents thus strive to balance cost and benefit to build cost-effective structures with the greatest positive impact on local wildlife and motorists. Ideal dimensions of overpasses and underpasses vary by species, but scientists generally suggest that overpasses for large mammals should be approximately 50 m wide. Optimal width also depends on structure length, with longer structures requiring additional width. Accordingly, experts have suggested a width to length ratio of 0.8. We sought to assess how these recommendations manifested in practice—where agencies use this information to design and build structures while also balancing cost and logistical challenges—and the degree to which built structures conform to current recommendations. We identified 120 wildlife overpasses across the world that were constructed to reduce the negative impacts of roads. Using a novel measurement technique, we analyzed the dimensions of these 120 overpasses located in North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania. The average width of the wildlife overpasses was 34 m. Most wildlife overpasses located in North America and Europe did not meet their respective dimensional expert guidelines. We investigate reasons explaining the non-compliance and provide recommendations for future overpass designs. Building on previous evidence showing that wider overpasses have increased crossing rates, we examined crossing rates for multiple large mammal species across 12 overpasses located in western North America. We qualitatively observed that wider North American overpasses (40–60 m), in or near compliance with expert guidelines, were associated with a more diverse set of species use and had nearly twice the average crossing rates when compared to non-compliant, narrow North American overpasses. In reviewing various studies from around the world, we conclude that wide overpasses (~50 m) continue to present ecologically sound and cost-effective solutions for decreasing the barrier of roadways, especially when targeting width-sensitive species and large assemblages of mammals. Future studies, however, are encouraged to further explore the specific instances when underpasses and narrower overpasses present more cost-effective ecological solutions, or how these structures can complement wide overpasses in successful wildlife crossing systems. PeerJ Inc. 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9753749/ /pubmed/36530405 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14371 Text en © 2022 Brennan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biogeography
Brennan, Liam
Chow, Emily
Lamb, Clayton
Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations
title Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations
title_full Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations
title_fullStr Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations
title_short Wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations
title_sort wildlife overpass structure size, distribution, effectiveness, and adherence to expert design recommendations
topic Biogeography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530405
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14371
work_keys_str_mv AT brennanliam wildlifeoverpassstructuresizedistributioneffectivenessandadherencetoexpertdesignrecommendations
AT chowemily wildlifeoverpassstructuresizedistributioneffectivenessandadherencetoexpertdesignrecommendations
AT lambclayton wildlifeoverpassstructuresizedistributioneffectivenessandadherencetoexpertdesignrecommendations