Cargando…
What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature
BACKGROUND: The burden of non-communicable diseases (including poor mental health) is increasing, and some practitioners are turning to nature to provide the solution. Nature-based interventions (NBIs) could offer cost-effective solutions by reconnecting individuals with nature, but the success of t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society of Global Health
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9754067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36520498 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04099 |
_version_ | 1784851104997048320 |
---|---|
author | Nejade, Rachel M Grace, Daniel Bowman, Leigh R |
author_facet | Nejade, Rachel M Grace, Daniel Bowman, Leigh R |
author_sort | Nejade, Rachel M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The burden of non-communicable diseases (including poor mental health) is increasing, and some practitioners are turning to nature to provide the solution. Nature-based interventions (NBIs) could offer cost-effective solutions by reconnecting individuals with nature, but the success of these interventions depends partially on the way in which people engage with blue and green spaces. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Cochrane guidelines to establish the evidence base for treating poor mental and physical health with NBIs. We searched five databases and the grey literature. Exposure was the active engagement with natural environments. The primary outcome was mental health and the secondary outcome was physical health defined using established metrics. All data were extracted to a charting table and reported as a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: 952 studies were identified, of which 39 met the inclusion criteria. 92% demonstrated consistent improvements across any health outcome where individuals engaged with natural outdoor environments. Mental health outcomes improved across 98% of studies while physical and cognitive health outcomes showed improvement across 83% and 75% of studies respectively. Additionally, we identified 153 factors affecting engagement with nature, 78% of which facilitated engagement compared with 22% that reduced engagement. Aspects such as the sense of wilderness, accessibility, opportunities for physical activity and the absence of noise/ air pollution all increased engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Further research (accompanied by a global improvement in study design) is needed to establish the magnitude and relative effect of nature-based interventions, and to quantify the compounding effect of factors that improve engagement with green and blue spaces. Nevertheless, this review has documented the increasing body of evidence in support of NBIs as effective tools to improve mental, physical, and cognitive health outcomes, and highlighted key factors that improve engagement with the natural world. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8J5Q3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9754067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | International Society of Global Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97540672022-12-23 What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature Nejade, Rachel M Grace, Daniel Bowman, Leigh R J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: The burden of non-communicable diseases (including poor mental health) is increasing, and some practitioners are turning to nature to provide the solution. Nature-based interventions (NBIs) could offer cost-effective solutions by reconnecting individuals with nature, but the success of these interventions depends partially on the way in which people engage with blue and green spaces. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Cochrane guidelines to establish the evidence base for treating poor mental and physical health with NBIs. We searched five databases and the grey literature. Exposure was the active engagement with natural environments. The primary outcome was mental health and the secondary outcome was physical health defined using established metrics. All data were extracted to a charting table and reported as a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: 952 studies were identified, of which 39 met the inclusion criteria. 92% demonstrated consistent improvements across any health outcome where individuals engaged with natural outdoor environments. Mental health outcomes improved across 98% of studies while physical and cognitive health outcomes showed improvement across 83% and 75% of studies respectively. Additionally, we identified 153 factors affecting engagement with nature, 78% of which facilitated engagement compared with 22% that reduced engagement. Aspects such as the sense of wilderness, accessibility, opportunities for physical activity and the absence of noise/ air pollution all increased engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Further research (accompanied by a global improvement in study design) is needed to establish the magnitude and relative effect of nature-based interventions, and to quantify the compounding effect of factors that improve engagement with green and blue spaces. Nevertheless, this review has documented the increasing body of evidence in support of NBIs as effective tools to improve mental, physical, and cognitive health outcomes, and highlighted key factors that improve engagement with the natural world. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8J5Q3. International Society of Global Health 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9754067/ /pubmed/36520498 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04099 Text en Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Nejade, Rachel M Grace, Daniel Bowman, Leigh R What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature |
title | What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature |
title_full | What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature |
title_fullStr | What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature |
title_short | What is the impact of nature on human health? A scoping review of the literature |
title_sort | what is the impact of nature on human health? a scoping review of the literature |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9754067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36520498 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nejaderachelm whatistheimpactofnatureonhumanhealthascopingreviewoftheliterature AT gracedaniel whatistheimpactofnatureonhumanhealthascopingreviewoftheliterature AT bowmanleighr whatistheimpactofnatureonhumanhealthascopingreviewoftheliterature |