Cargando…
Deep-learning-based 3D super-resolution MRI radiomics model: superior predictive performance in preoperative T-staging of rectal cancer
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of a deep-learning (DL)-based three-dimensional (3D) super-resolution (SR) MRI radiomics model for preoperative T-staging prediction in rectal cancer (RC). METHODS: Seven hundred six eligible RC patients (T1/2 = 287, T3/4 = 419) were retrospect...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08952-8 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of a deep-learning (DL)-based three-dimensional (3D) super-resolution (SR) MRI radiomics model for preoperative T-staging prediction in rectal cancer (RC). METHODS: Seven hundred six eligible RC patients (T1/2 = 287, T3/4 = 419) were retrospectively enrolled in this study and chronologically allocated into a training cohort (n = 565) and a validation cohort (n = 141). We conducted a deep-transfer-learning network on high-resolution (HR) T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) to enhance the z-resolution of the images and acquired the preoperative SRT2WI. The radiomics models named model(HRT2) and model(SRT2) were respectively constructed with high-dimensional quantitative features extracted from manually segmented volume of interests of HRT2WI and SRT2WI through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator method. The performances of the models were evaluated by ROC, calibration, and decision curves. RESULTS: Model(SRT2) outperformed model(HRT2) (AUC 0.869, sensitivity 71.1%, specificity 93.1%, and accuracy 83.3% vs. AUC 0.810, sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 70.1%, and accuracy 77.3%) in distinguishing T1/2 and T3/4 RC with significant difference (p < 0.05). Both radiomics models achieved higher AUCs than the expert radiologists (0.685, 95% confidence interval 0.595–0.775, p < 0.05). The calibration curves confirmed high goodness of fit, and the decision curve analysis revealed the clinical value. CONCLUSIONS: Model(SRT2) yielded superior predictive performance in preoperative RC T-staging by comparison with model(HRT2) and expert radiologists’ visual assessments. KEY POINTS: • For the first time, DL-based 3D SR images were applied in radiomics analysis for clinical utility. • Compared with the visual assessment of expert radiologists and the conventional radiomics model based on HRT2WI, the SR radiomics model showed a more favorable capability in helping clinicians assess the invasion depth of RC preoperatively. • This is the largest radiomics study for T-staging prediction in RC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08952-8. |
---|