Cargando…

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography

OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores derived from computed tomography (CT) scans are used for cardiovascular risk stratification. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in CAC quantification and potentially reduce the time required for human analysis. This study aimed to develop and eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman, Lan, Nick S. R., Williams, Michelle, Newby, David, Flack, Julien, Kwok, Simon, Joyner, Jack, Gera, Sahil, Dembo, Lawrence, Adler, Brendan, Ko, Brian, Chow, Benjamin J. W., Dwivedi, Girish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09028-3
_version_ 1784851353986662400
author Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman
Lan, Nick S. R.
Williams, Michelle
Newby, David
Flack, Julien
Kwok, Simon
Joyner, Jack
Gera, Sahil
Dembo, Lawrence
Adler, Brendan
Ko, Brian
Chow, Benjamin J. W.
Dwivedi, Girish
author_facet Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman
Lan, Nick S. R.
Williams, Michelle
Newby, David
Flack, Julien
Kwok, Simon
Joyner, Jack
Gera, Sahil
Dembo, Lawrence
Adler, Brendan
Ko, Brian
Chow, Benjamin J. W.
Dwivedi, Girish
author_sort Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores derived from computed tomography (CT) scans are used for cardiovascular risk stratification. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in CAC quantification and potentially reduce the time required for human analysis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fully automated model that identifies and quantifies CAC. METHODS: Fully convolutional neural networks for automated CAC scoring were developed and trained on 2439 cardiac CT scans and validated using 771 scans. The model was tested on an independent set of 1849 cardiac CT scans. Agatston CAC scores were further categorised into five risk categories (0, 1–10, 11–100, 101–400, and > 400). Automated scores were compared to the manual reference standard (level 3 expert readers). RESULTS: Of 1849 scans used for model testing (mean age 55.7 ± 10.5 years, 49% males), the automated model detected the presence of CAC in 867 (47%) scans compared with 815 (44%) by human readers (p = 0.09). CAC scores from the model correlated very strongly with the manual score (Spearman’s r = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–0.91, p < 0.001 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, p < 0.001). The model classified 1646 (89%) into the same risk category as human observers. The Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated little difference (1.69, 95% limits of agreement: −41.22, 44.60) and there was almost excellent agreement (Cohen’s κ = 0.90, 95% CI 0.88–0.91, p < 0.001). Model analysis time was 13.1 ± 3.2 s/scan. CONCLUSIONS: This artificial intelligence–based fully automated CAC scoring model shows high accuracy and low analysis times. Its potential to optimise clinical workflow efficiency and patient outcomes requires evaluation. KEY POINTS: • Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are traditionally assessed using cardiac computed tomography and require manual input by human operators to identify calcified lesions. • A novel artificial intelligence (AI)–based model for fully automated CAC scoring was developed and tested on an independent dataset of computed tomography scans, showing very high levels of correlation and agreement with manual measurements as a reference standard. • AI has the potential to assist in the identification and quantification of CAC, thereby reducing the time required for human analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09028-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9755106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97551062022-12-17 Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman Lan, Nick S. R. Williams, Michelle Newby, David Flack, Julien Kwok, Simon Joyner, Jack Gera, Sahil Dembo, Lawrence Adler, Brendan Ko, Brian Chow, Benjamin J. W. Dwivedi, Girish Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores derived from computed tomography (CT) scans are used for cardiovascular risk stratification. Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in CAC quantification and potentially reduce the time required for human analysis. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fully automated model that identifies and quantifies CAC. METHODS: Fully convolutional neural networks for automated CAC scoring were developed and trained on 2439 cardiac CT scans and validated using 771 scans. The model was tested on an independent set of 1849 cardiac CT scans. Agatston CAC scores were further categorised into five risk categories (0, 1–10, 11–100, 101–400, and > 400). Automated scores were compared to the manual reference standard (level 3 expert readers). RESULTS: Of 1849 scans used for model testing (mean age 55.7 ± 10.5 years, 49% males), the automated model detected the presence of CAC in 867 (47%) scans compared with 815 (44%) by human readers (p = 0.09). CAC scores from the model correlated very strongly with the manual score (Spearman’s r = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–0.91, p < 0.001 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98, 95% CI 0.98–0.99, p < 0.001). The model classified 1646 (89%) into the same risk category as human observers. The Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated little difference (1.69, 95% limits of agreement: −41.22, 44.60) and there was almost excellent agreement (Cohen’s κ = 0.90, 95% CI 0.88–0.91, p < 0.001). Model analysis time was 13.1 ± 3.2 s/scan. CONCLUSIONS: This artificial intelligence–based fully automated CAC scoring model shows high accuracy and low analysis times. Its potential to optimise clinical workflow efficiency and patient outcomes requires evaluation. KEY POINTS: • Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are traditionally assessed using cardiac computed tomography and require manual input by human operators to identify calcified lesions. • A novel artificial intelligence (AI)–based model for fully automated CAC scoring was developed and tested on an independent dataset of computed tomography scans, showing very high levels of correlation and agreement with manual measurements as a reference standard. • AI has the potential to assist in the identification and quantification of CAC, thereby reducing the time required for human analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09028-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9755106/ /pubmed/35986771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09028-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiac
Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman
Lan, Nick S. R.
Williams, Michelle
Newby, David
Flack, Julien
Kwok, Simon
Joyner, Jack
Gera, Sahil
Dembo, Lawrence
Adler, Brendan
Ko, Brian
Chow, Benjamin J. W.
Dwivedi, Girish
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
title Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
title_full Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
title_fullStr Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
title_short Evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
title_sort evaluation of an artificial intelligence coronary artery calcium scoring model from computed tomography
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09028-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ihdayhidabdulrahman evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT lannicksr evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT williamsmichelle evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT newbydavid evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT flackjulien evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT kwoksimon evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT joynerjack evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT gerasahil evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT dembolawrence evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT adlerbrendan evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT kobrian evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT chowbenjaminjw evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography
AT dwivedigirish evaluationofanartificialintelligencecoronaryarterycalciumscoringmodelfromcomputedtomography