Cargando…

Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?

The typical approach to management of respiratory distress is focused on oxygen supplementation. However, additional oxygen alone does not improve outcomes, particularly in critically ill patients. Instead, supplemental oxygen can be associated with increased morbidities. We present the hypothesis t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sciarretta, Christopher, Greenberg, Jeremy, Wyatt, Kara D., Whittle, Jessica S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1070517
_version_ 1784851410510151680
author Sciarretta, Christopher
Greenberg, Jeremy
Wyatt, Kara D.
Whittle, Jessica S.
author_facet Sciarretta, Christopher
Greenberg, Jeremy
Wyatt, Kara D.
Whittle, Jessica S.
author_sort Sciarretta, Christopher
collection PubMed
description The typical approach to management of respiratory distress is focused on oxygen supplementation. However, additional oxygen alone does not improve outcomes, particularly in critically ill patients. Instead, supplemental oxygen can be associated with increased morbidities. We present the hypothesis that clinicians should focus on reducing the work of breathing early in the course of critical illness. Rather than simply supplementing oxygen, newer technologies including high flow nasal oxygen, may be utilized to increase the efficiency of gas exchange. By reducing the work of breathing, the cardiac workload can be reduced, thus relieving some excess physiologic stress and supporting the critically ill patient. To illustrate this point, we provided three clinical cases of respiratory failure from non-pulmonary origins; all cases displayed hemodynamic improvement due to reducing the work of breathing through high-velocity therapy prior to receiving definitive therapy for underlying pathologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9755340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97553402022-12-17 Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier? Sciarretta, Christopher Greenberg, Jeremy Wyatt, Kara D. Whittle, Jessica S. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine The typical approach to management of respiratory distress is focused on oxygen supplementation. However, additional oxygen alone does not improve outcomes, particularly in critically ill patients. Instead, supplemental oxygen can be associated with increased morbidities. We present the hypothesis that clinicians should focus on reducing the work of breathing early in the course of critical illness. Rather than simply supplementing oxygen, newer technologies including high flow nasal oxygen, may be utilized to increase the efficiency of gas exchange. By reducing the work of breathing, the cardiac workload can be reduced, thus relieving some excess physiologic stress and supporting the critically ill patient. To illustrate this point, we provided three clinical cases of respiratory failure from non-pulmonary origins; all cases displayed hemodynamic improvement due to reducing the work of breathing through high-velocity therapy prior to receiving definitive therapy for underlying pathologies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9755340/ /pubmed/36530918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1070517 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sciarretta, Greenberg, Wyatt and Whittle. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Sciarretta, Christopher
Greenberg, Jeremy
Wyatt, Kara D.
Whittle, Jessica S.
Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?
title Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?
title_full Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?
title_fullStr Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?
title_full_unstemmed Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?
title_short Back to basics with newer technology: Should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?
title_sort back to basics with newer technology: should we focus on reducing work of breathing earlier?
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1070517
work_keys_str_mv AT sciarrettachristopher backtobasicswithnewertechnologyshouldwefocusonreducingworkofbreathingearlier
AT greenbergjeremy backtobasicswithnewertechnologyshouldwefocusonreducingworkofbreathingearlier
AT wyattkarad backtobasicswithnewertechnologyshouldwefocusonreducingworkofbreathingearlier
AT whittlejessicas backtobasicswithnewertechnologyshouldwefocusonreducingworkofbreathingearlier