Cargando…

Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?

In the Third and Fourth Assessment Reports (TAR and AR4, respectively) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), vulnerability is conceived as a function of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. However, in its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disaste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estoque, Ronald C., Ishtiaque, Asif, Parajuli, Jagadish, Athukorala, Darshana, Rabby, Yasin Wahid, Ooba, Makoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01806-z
_version_ 1784851420061630464
author Estoque, Ronald C.
Ishtiaque, Asif
Parajuli, Jagadish
Athukorala, Darshana
Rabby, Yasin Wahid
Ooba, Makoto
author_facet Estoque, Ronald C.
Ishtiaque, Asif
Parajuli, Jagadish
Athukorala, Darshana
Rabby, Yasin Wahid
Ooba, Makoto
author_sort Estoque, Ronald C.
collection PubMed
description In the Third and Fourth Assessment Reports (TAR and AR4, respectively) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), vulnerability is conceived as a function of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. However, in its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) and Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), the IPCC redefined and separated exposure, and it reconceptualized vulnerability to be a function of sensitivity and capacity to cope and adapt. In this review, we found that the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept has not been well adopted and that researchers’ preference, possible misinterpretation, possible confusion, and possible unawareness are among the possible technical and practical reasons. Among the issues that need further clarification from the IPCC is whether or not such a reconceptualization of vulnerability in the SREX/AR5 necessarily implies nullification of the TAR/AR4 vulnerability concept as far as the IPCC is concerned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9755408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97554082022-12-17 Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted? Estoque, Ronald C. Ishtiaque, Asif Parajuli, Jagadish Athukorala, Darshana Rabby, Yasin Wahid Ooba, Makoto Ambio Review In the Third and Fourth Assessment Reports (TAR and AR4, respectively) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), vulnerability is conceived as a function of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. However, in its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) and Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), the IPCC redefined and separated exposure, and it reconceptualized vulnerability to be a function of sensitivity and capacity to cope and adapt. In this review, we found that the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept has not been well adopted and that researchers’ preference, possible misinterpretation, possible confusion, and possible unawareness are among the possible technical and practical reasons. Among the issues that need further clarification from the IPCC is whether or not such a reconceptualization of vulnerability in the SREX/AR5 necessarily implies nullification of the TAR/AR4 vulnerability concept as far as the IPCC is concerned. Springer Netherlands 2022-11-21 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9755408/ /pubmed/36414854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01806-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Estoque, Ronald C.
Ishtiaque, Asif
Parajuli, Jagadish
Athukorala, Darshana
Rabby, Yasin Wahid
Ooba, Makoto
Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
title Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
title_full Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
title_fullStr Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
title_full_unstemmed Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
title_short Has the IPCC’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
title_sort has the ipcc’s revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01806-z
work_keys_str_mv AT estoqueronaldc hastheipccsrevisedvulnerabilityconceptbeenwelladopted
AT ishtiaqueasif hastheipccsrevisedvulnerabilityconceptbeenwelladopted
AT parajulijagadish hastheipccsrevisedvulnerabilityconceptbeenwelladopted
AT athukoraladarshana hastheipccsrevisedvulnerabilityconceptbeenwelladopted
AT rabbyyasinwahid hastheipccsrevisedvulnerabilityconceptbeenwelladopted
AT oobamakoto hastheipccsrevisedvulnerabilityconceptbeenwelladopted