Cargando…

Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort

BACKGROUND: Large-scale trials have shown that hypofractionated adjuvant breast radiotherapy was as effective in terms of survival and local control as conventional fractionated radiotherapy, and acute toxicity was reduced with hypofractionated radiotherapy. However, there is a lack of data about th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruand, Marie, Salleron, Julia, Guihard, Sébastien, Crety, Charles Marchand, Liem, Xavier, Pasquier, David, Lamrani-Ghaouti, Assia, Charra-Brunaud, Claire, Peiffert, Didier, Clavier, Jean-Baptiste, Desandes, Emmanuel, Faivre, Jean-Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10402-z
_version_ 1784851499449319424
author Bruand, Marie
Salleron, Julia
Guihard, Sébastien
Crety, Charles Marchand
Liem, Xavier
Pasquier, David
Lamrani-Ghaouti, Assia
Charra-Brunaud, Claire
Peiffert, Didier
Clavier, Jean-Baptiste
Desandes, Emmanuel
Faivre, Jean-Christophe
author_facet Bruand, Marie
Salleron, Julia
Guihard, Sébastien
Crety, Charles Marchand
Liem, Xavier
Pasquier, David
Lamrani-Ghaouti, Assia
Charra-Brunaud, Claire
Peiffert, Didier
Clavier, Jean-Baptiste
Desandes, Emmanuel
Faivre, Jean-Christophe
author_sort Bruand, Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large-scale trials have shown that hypofractionated adjuvant breast radiotherapy was as effective in terms of survival and local control as conventional fractionated radiotherapy, and acute toxicity was reduced with hypofractionated radiotherapy. However, there is a lack of data about the toxicity of breast with regional nodal irradiation (RNI). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of fractionation on radiation-related acute skin toxicity in patients receiving RNI in addition to whole-breast or chest wall irradiation, using real-life data. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study with systematic computerized data collection integrated into Mosaiq®. Three comprehensive cancer centers used a standardized form to prospectively collect patient characteristics, treatment characteristics and toxicity. RESULTS: Between November 2016 and January 2022, 1727 patients were assessed; 1419 (82.2%) and 308 (17.8%) patients respectively received conventional fractionated and hypofractionated radiation therapy. Overall, the incidence of acute grade 2 or higher dermatitis was 28.4% (490 patients). Incidence was lower with hypofractionated than with conventional fractioned radiation therapy (odds ratio (OR) 0.34 [0.29;0.41]). Two prognostic factors were found to increase the risk of acute dermatitis, namely 3D (vs IMRT) and breast irradiation (vs chest wall). CONCLUSION: Using real-life data from unselected patients with regional nodal irradiation, our findings confirm the decreased risk of dermatitis previously reported with hypofractionated radiation therapy in clinical trials. Expansion of systematic data collection systems to include additional centers as well as dosimetric data is warranted to further evaluate the short- and long-term effects of fractionation in real life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10402-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9755801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97558012022-12-16 Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort Bruand, Marie Salleron, Julia Guihard, Sébastien Crety, Charles Marchand Liem, Xavier Pasquier, David Lamrani-Ghaouti, Assia Charra-Brunaud, Claire Peiffert, Didier Clavier, Jean-Baptiste Desandes, Emmanuel Faivre, Jean-Christophe BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Large-scale trials have shown that hypofractionated adjuvant breast radiotherapy was as effective in terms of survival and local control as conventional fractionated radiotherapy, and acute toxicity was reduced with hypofractionated radiotherapy. However, there is a lack of data about the toxicity of breast with regional nodal irradiation (RNI). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of fractionation on radiation-related acute skin toxicity in patients receiving RNI in addition to whole-breast or chest wall irradiation, using real-life data. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study with systematic computerized data collection integrated into Mosaiq®. Three comprehensive cancer centers used a standardized form to prospectively collect patient characteristics, treatment characteristics and toxicity. RESULTS: Between November 2016 and January 2022, 1727 patients were assessed; 1419 (82.2%) and 308 (17.8%) patients respectively received conventional fractionated and hypofractionated radiation therapy. Overall, the incidence of acute grade 2 or higher dermatitis was 28.4% (490 patients). Incidence was lower with hypofractionated than with conventional fractioned radiation therapy (odds ratio (OR) 0.34 [0.29;0.41]). Two prognostic factors were found to increase the risk of acute dermatitis, namely 3D (vs IMRT) and breast irradiation (vs chest wall). CONCLUSION: Using real-life data from unselected patients with regional nodal irradiation, our findings confirm the decreased risk of dermatitis previously reported with hypofractionated radiation therapy in clinical trials. Expansion of systematic data collection systems to include additional centers as well as dosimetric data is warranted to further evaluate the short- and long-term effects of fractionation in real life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10402-z. BioMed Central 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9755801/ /pubmed/36526987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10402-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bruand, Marie
Salleron, Julia
Guihard, Sébastien
Crety, Charles Marchand
Liem, Xavier
Pasquier, David
Lamrani-Ghaouti, Assia
Charra-Brunaud, Claire
Peiffert, Didier
Clavier, Jean-Baptiste
Desandes, Emmanuel
Faivre, Jean-Christophe
Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort
title Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort
title_full Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort
title_fullStr Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort
title_full_unstemmed Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort
title_short Acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter HYPOBREAST cohort
title_sort acute skin toxicity of conventional fractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving regional node irradiation: the real-life prospective multicenter hypobreast cohort
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9755801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10402-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bruandmarie acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT salleronjulia acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT guihardsebastien acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT cretycharlesmarchand acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT liemxavier acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT pasquierdavid acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT lamranighaoutiassia acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT charrabrunaudclaire acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT peiffertdidier acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT clavierjeanbaptiste acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT desandesemmanuel acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort
AT faivrejeanchristophe acuteskintoxicityofconventionalfractionatedversushypofractionatedradiotherapyinbreastcancerpatientsreceivingregionalnodeirradiationthereallifeprospectivemulticenterhypobreastcohort