Cargando…
"Original Antigenic Sin" in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Followed by Infection
Although the "original antigenic sin" (OAS) effects have been predicted against new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), only a few pieces of evidence are available regarding its impact on the safety and effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540317 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32548 |
Sumario: | Although the "original antigenic sin" (OAS) effects have been predicted against new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), only a few pieces of evidence are available regarding its impact on the safety and effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This article aims to provide an immunological explanation for the delayed side effects of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during an episode of natural infection. We reported a case of a 39-year-old male healthcare worker who complained about pruritus and discomfort around the injection site of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administrated 18, 17, and 13 months earlier. Those symptoms resembled the side effects previously experienced with one of the booster doses, and a sole erythematous papule was also documented. The patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 one or two days after noticing these local signs and symptoms, and high serum titers of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin E (IgE) were found five weeks after the onset, along with SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. Therefore, the OAS might be a plausible phenomenon to consider in individuals immunized with inactivated vaccines and exposed secondarily to a wild virus with antigenic variations. |
---|