Cargando…

How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data

OBJECTIVE: The Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) is a key data resource for injury surveillance. The VEMD collects emergency department data from 39 public hospitals across Victoria; however, rural emergency care services are not well captured. The aim of this study is to determine the repr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rezaei-Darzi, Ehsan, Berecki-Gisolf, Janneke, Fernando, Dasamal Tharanga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063115
_version_ 1784851584645070848
author Rezaei-Darzi, Ehsan
Berecki-Gisolf, Janneke
Fernando, Dasamal Tharanga
author_facet Rezaei-Darzi, Ehsan
Berecki-Gisolf, Janneke
Fernando, Dasamal Tharanga
author_sort Rezaei-Darzi, Ehsan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) is a key data resource for injury surveillance. The VEMD collects emergency department data from 39 public hospitals across Victoria; however, rural emergency care services are not well captured. The aim of this study is to determine the representativeness of the VEMD for injury surveillance. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Injury admissions in 2014/2015–2018/2019 were extracted from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED) which captures all Victorian hospital admissions; only cases that arrived through a hospital’s emergency department (ED) were included. Each admission was categorised as taking place in a VEMD-contributing versus a non-VEMD hospital. RESULTS: There were 535 477 incident injury admissions in the study period, of which 517 207 (96.6%) were admitted to a VEMD contributing hospital. Male gender (OR 1.13 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.17)) and young age (age 0–14 vs 45–54 years, OR 4.68 (95% CI 3.52 to 6.21)) were associated with VEMD participating (vs non-VEMD-participating) hospitals. Residing in regional/rural areas was negatively associated with VEMD participating (vs non-VEMD participating) hospitals (OR=0.11 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.11)). Intentional injury (assault and self-harm) was also associated with VEMD participation. CONCLUSIONS: VEMD representativeness is largely consistent across the whole of Victoria, but varies vastly by region, with substantial under-representation of some areas of Victoria. By comparison, for injury surveillance, regional rates are more reliable when based on the VAED. For local ED-presentation rates, the bias analysis results can be used to create weights, as a temporary solution until rural emergency services injury data is systematically collected and included in state-wide injury surveillance databases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9756213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97562132022-12-17 How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data Rezaei-Darzi, Ehsan Berecki-Gisolf, Janneke Fernando, Dasamal Tharanga BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) is a key data resource for injury surveillance. The VEMD collects emergency department data from 39 public hospitals across Victoria; however, rural emergency care services are not well captured. The aim of this study is to determine the representativeness of the VEMD for injury surveillance. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Injury admissions in 2014/2015–2018/2019 were extracted from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED) which captures all Victorian hospital admissions; only cases that arrived through a hospital’s emergency department (ED) were included. Each admission was categorised as taking place in a VEMD-contributing versus a non-VEMD hospital. RESULTS: There were 535 477 incident injury admissions in the study period, of which 517 207 (96.6%) were admitted to a VEMD contributing hospital. Male gender (OR 1.13 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.17)) and young age (age 0–14 vs 45–54 years, OR 4.68 (95% CI 3.52 to 6.21)) were associated with VEMD participating (vs non-VEMD-participating) hospitals. Residing in regional/rural areas was negatively associated with VEMD participating (vs non-VEMD participating) hospitals (OR=0.11 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.11)). Intentional injury (assault and self-harm) was also associated with VEMD participation. CONCLUSIONS: VEMD representativeness is largely consistent across the whole of Victoria, but varies vastly by region, with substantial under-representation of some areas of Victoria. By comparison, for injury surveillance, regional rates are more reliable when based on the VAED. For local ED-presentation rates, the bias analysis results can be used to create weights, as a temporary solution until rural emergency services injury data is systematically collected and included in state-wide injury surveillance databases. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9756213/ /pubmed/36517103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063115 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Rezaei-Darzi, Ehsan
Berecki-Gisolf, Janneke
Fernando, Dasamal Tharanga
How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data
title How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data
title_full How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data
title_fullStr How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data
title_full_unstemmed How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data
title_short How representative is the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) for population-based injury surveillance in Victoria? A retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data
title_sort how representative is the victorian emergency minimum dataset (vemd) for population-based injury surveillance in victoria? a retrospective observational study of administrative healthcare data
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063115
work_keys_str_mv AT rezaeidarziehsan howrepresentativeisthevictorianemergencyminimumdatasetvemdforpopulationbasedinjurysurveillanceinvictoriaaretrospectiveobservationalstudyofadministrativehealthcaredata
AT bereckigisolfjanneke howrepresentativeisthevictorianemergencyminimumdatasetvemdforpopulationbasedinjurysurveillanceinvictoriaaretrospectiveobservationalstudyofadministrativehealthcaredata
AT fernandodasamaltharanga howrepresentativeisthevictorianemergencyminimumdatasetvemdforpopulationbasedinjurysurveillanceinvictoriaaretrospectiveobservationalstudyofadministrativehealthcaredata