Cargando…

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of anterior shoulder instability continues to evolve. The clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) in patients with increasing glenoid bone loss (GBL) has not been thoroughly compared with Latarjet. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horinek, Jeffrey L., Menendez, Mariano E., Narbona, Pablo, Lädermann, Alexandre, Barth, Johannes, Denard, Patrick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221142257
_version_ 1784851617922678784
author Horinek, Jeffrey L.
Menendez, Mariano E.
Narbona, Pablo
Lädermann, Alexandre
Barth, Johannes
Denard, Patrick J.
author_facet Horinek, Jeffrey L.
Menendez, Mariano E.
Narbona, Pablo
Lädermann, Alexandre
Barth, Johannes
Denard, Patrick J.
author_sort Horinek, Jeffrey L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical management of anterior shoulder instability continues to evolve. The clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) in patients with increasing glenoid bone loss (GBL) has not been thoroughly compared with Latarjet. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year outcomes of REMP versus open Latarjet in patients with >15% GBL. We hypothesized that there would be no difference. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary REMP or Latarjet by 4 shoulder specialists between August 2013 and December 2019 for >15% GBL. Procedure performance was based on shared decision making between the surgeon and patient. Baseline and 2-year postoperative range of motion (ROM) and the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected: Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain. Return to sport, satisfaction, complications, recurrence, and revisions were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were available for study, including 22 who underwent REMP and 25 who underwent Latarjet. Baseline demographic characteristics, ROM, and PROs were similar between the groups. Mean preoperative GBL (REMP 25.8% ± 7.8% vs Latarjet 25.1% ± 9.0%; P = .800) and off-track lesions (REMP 59.1% vs Latarjet 44.0%; P = .302) were similar. Postoperative change in external rotation favored Latarjet (10° ± 22° vs –4° ± 13°; P = .017). Postoperative PROs, return to the sports (86.4% vs 87.5%; P = .99), and satisfaction (95.5% vs 95.8%; P = .99) were similar between groups. There were no recurrent dislocations in either group. One infected hematoma was encountered in the Latarjet cohort. CONCLUSION: At short-term follow-up, the hypothesis was upheld. REMP and Latarjet provided similar outcomes for patients with >15% GBL, although REMP patients experienced slightly decreased external rotation. Although larger series and longer-term follow-ups are required, remplissage may be considered in patients with >15% glenoid bone loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9756371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97563712022-12-17 Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss Horinek, Jeffrey L. Menendez, Mariano E. Narbona, Pablo Lädermann, Alexandre Barth, Johannes Denard, Patrick J. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Surgical management of anterior shoulder instability continues to evolve. The clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) in patients with increasing glenoid bone loss (GBL) has not been thoroughly compared with Latarjet. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year outcomes of REMP versus open Latarjet in patients with >15% GBL. We hypothesized that there would be no difference. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary REMP or Latarjet by 4 shoulder specialists between August 2013 and December 2019 for >15% GBL. Procedure performance was based on shared decision making between the surgeon and patient. Baseline and 2-year postoperative range of motion (ROM) and the following patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected: Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain. Return to sport, satisfaction, complications, recurrence, and revisions were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were available for study, including 22 who underwent REMP and 25 who underwent Latarjet. Baseline demographic characteristics, ROM, and PROs were similar between the groups. Mean preoperative GBL (REMP 25.8% ± 7.8% vs Latarjet 25.1% ± 9.0%; P = .800) and off-track lesions (REMP 59.1% vs Latarjet 44.0%; P = .302) were similar. Postoperative change in external rotation favored Latarjet (10° ± 22° vs –4° ± 13°; P = .017). Postoperative PROs, return to the sports (86.4% vs 87.5%; P = .99), and satisfaction (95.5% vs 95.8%; P = .99) were similar between groups. There were no recurrent dislocations in either group. One infected hematoma was encountered in the Latarjet cohort. CONCLUSION: At short-term follow-up, the hypothesis was upheld. REMP and Latarjet provided similar outcomes for patients with >15% GBL, although REMP patients experienced slightly decreased external rotation. Although larger series and longer-term follow-ups are required, remplissage may be considered in patients with >15% glenoid bone loss. SAGE Publications 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9756371/ /pubmed/36532154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221142257 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Horinek, Jeffrey L.
Menendez, Mariano E.
Narbona, Pablo
Lädermann, Alexandre
Barth, Johannes
Denard, Patrick J.
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss
title Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss
title_full Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss
title_fullStr Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss
title_short Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage as an Alternative to Latarjet for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With More Than 15% Glenoid Bone Loss
title_sort arthroscopic bankart repair with remplissage as an alternative to latarjet for anterior glenohumeral instability with more than 15% glenoid bone loss
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221142257
work_keys_str_mv AT horinekjeffreyl arthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissageasanalternativetolatarjetforanteriorglenohumeralinstabilitywithmorethan15glenoidboneloss
AT menendezmarianoe arthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissageasanalternativetolatarjetforanteriorglenohumeralinstabilitywithmorethan15glenoidboneloss
AT narbonapablo arthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissageasanalternativetolatarjetforanteriorglenohumeralinstabilitywithmorethan15glenoidboneloss
AT ladermannalexandre arthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissageasanalternativetolatarjetforanteriorglenohumeralinstabilitywithmorethan15glenoidboneloss
AT barthjohannes arthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissageasanalternativetolatarjetforanteriorglenohumeralinstabilitywithmorethan15glenoidboneloss
AT denardpatrickj arthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissageasanalternativetolatarjetforanteriorglenohumeralinstabilitywithmorethan15glenoidboneloss