Cargando…

Using group testing in a two-phase epidemiologic design to identify the effects of a large number of antibody reactions on disease risk

BACKGROUND: The role of immunological responses to exposed bacteria on disease incidence is increasingly under investigation. With many bacterial species, and many potential antibody reactions to a particular species, the large number of assays required for this type of discovery can make it prohibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehta, Tanvi, Malinovsky, Yaakov, Abnet, Christian C., Albert, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01798-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The role of immunological responses to exposed bacteria on disease incidence is increasingly under investigation. With many bacterial species, and many potential antibody reactions to a particular species, the large number of assays required for this type of discovery can make it prohibitively expensive. We propose a two-phase group testing design to more efficiently screen numerous antibody effects in a case-control setting. METHODS: Phase 1 uses group testing to select antibodies that are differentially expressed between cases and controls. The selected antibodies go on to Phase 2 individual testing. RESULTS: We evaluate the two-phase group testing design through simulations and example data and find that it substantially reduces the number of assays required relative to standard case-control and group testing designs, while maintaining similar statistical properties. CONCLUSION: The proposed two-phase group testing design can dramatically reduce the number of assays required, while providing comparable results to a case-control design. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01798-0.