Cargando…
Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis
Many governments have implemented strict lockdown measures to prevent the transmission of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Compliance with these restrictions is vital and depends greatly on the level of trust in the institutions central to their development and implementation. The objectives of thi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819 |
_version_ | 1784851686370574336 |
---|---|
author | Oude Groeniger, Joost Noordzij, Kjell van der Waal, Jeroen de Koster, Willem |
author_facet | Oude Groeniger, Joost Noordzij, Kjell van der Waal, Jeroen de Koster, Willem |
author_sort | Oude Groeniger, Joost |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many governments have implemented strict lockdown measures to prevent the transmission of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Compliance with these restrictions is vital and depends greatly on the level of trust in the institutions central to their development and implementation. The objectives of this study were to assess: (1) the effects of the Dutch lockdown measures imposed in March 2020 on trust in government and trust in science; and (2) whether these differ across social groups. We draw on unique data from the high-quality Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel, which comprises a true probability sample of Dutch households (average participation rate: 80.4%). Our data were collected on an ongoing basis from December 2017 to March 2020 (n = 2219). Using the implementation of lockdown measures in mid-March as a natural experiment, we employed difference-in-differences analyses to assess the causal effect of the Dutch lockdown measures on trust in government and trust in science. We estimated that the imposition of the measures caused an 18% increase (95% confidence interval (CI):15%–21%)) in trust in government and a 6% increase (95% CI: 4%–8%) in trust in science. The impact on trust in government was greater among the participants aged 65 and older and those with poor self-assessed health, although the relevant CIs were wide and, in the case of self-assessed health, included the null. No differential effects were observed for trust in science. Our study indicates that the strict public-health measures imposed in the Netherlands during an acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic generated trust in the institutions involved in drafting and implementing them, especially among those with a higher risk of serious health outcomes. This suggests that, to prevent a major public-health crisis, people appreciate firm government intervention during the acute phase of an infectious disease pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9756755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97567552022-12-16 Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis Oude Groeniger, Joost Noordzij, Kjell van der Waal, Jeroen de Koster, Willem Soc Sci Med Article Many governments have implemented strict lockdown measures to prevent the transmission of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Compliance with these restrictions is vital and depends greatly on the level of trust in the institutions central to their development and implementation. The objectives of this study were to assess: (1) the effects of the Dutch lockdown measures imposed in March 2020 on trust in government and trust in science; and (2) whether these differ across social groups. We draw on unique data from the high-quality Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel, which comprises a true probability sample of Dutch households (average participation rate: 80.4%). Our data were collected on an ongoing basis from December 2017 to March 2020 (n = 2219). Using the implementation of lockdown measures in mid-March as a natural experiment, we employed difference-in-differences analyses to assess the causal effect of the Dutch lockdown measures on trust in government and trust in science. We estimated that the imposition of the measures caused an 18% increase (95% confidence interval (CI):15%–21%)) in trust in government and a 6% increase (95% CI: 4%–8%) in trust in science. The impact on trust in government was greater among the participants aged 65 and older and those with poor self-assessed health, although the relevant CIs were wide and, in the case of self-assessed health, included the null. No differential effects were observed for trust in science. Our study indicates that the strict public-health measures imposed in the Netherlands during an acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic generated trust in the institutions involved in drafting and implementing them, especially among those with a higher risk of serious health outcomes. This suggests that, to prevent a major public-health crisis, people appreciate firm government intervention during the acute phase of an infectious disease pandemic. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-04 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9756755/ /pubmed/33725488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Oude Groeniger, Joost Noordzij, Kjell van der Waal, Jeroen de Koster, Willem Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis |
title | Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis |
title_full | Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis |
title_fullStr | Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis |
title_short | Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis |
title_sort | dutch covid-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: a difference-in-differences analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oudegroenigerjoost dutchcovid19lockdownmeasuresincreasedtrustingovernmentandtrustinscienceadifferenceindifferencesanalysis AT noordzijkjell dutchcovid19lockdownmeasuresincreasedtrustingovernmentandtrustinscienceadifferenceindifferencesanalysis AT vanderwaaljeroen dutchcovid19lockdownmeasuresincreasedtrustingovernmentandtrustinscienceadifferenceindifferencesanalysis AT dekosterwillem dutchcovid19lockdownmeasuresincreasedtrustingovernmentandtrustinscienceadifferenceindifferencesanalysis |