Cargando…
All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality()
The COVID-19 crisis has generated interest in all-mail voting (AMV) as a potential policy solution for avoiding in-person elections. However, the quality of AMV implementation has varied greatly across states, leading to mixed results in previous research. We exploit the understudied 2014 implementa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102363 |
_version_ | 1784851694245380096 |
---|---|
author | Bonica, Adam Grumbach, Jacob M. Hill, Charlotte Jefferson, Hakeem |
author_facet | Bonica, Adam Grumbach, Jacob M. Hill, Charlotte Jefferson, Hakeem |
author_sort | Bonica, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 crisis has generated interest in all-mail voting (AMV) as a potential policy solution for avoiding in-person elections. However, the quality of AMV implementation has varied greatly across states, leading to mixed results in previous research. We exploit the understudied 2014 implementation of AMV in Colorado to estimate the effect on turnout for all registered voters, along with age, racial, education, income and wealth, and occupational subgroups. Using large voter file data and a difference-in-differences design within individuals, we find a positive overall turnout effect of approximately 8 percentage points—translating into an additional 900,000 ballots being cast between 2014 and 2018. Effects are significantly larger among lower-propensity voting groups, such as young people, blue-collar workers, voters with less educational attainment, and voters of color. The results suggest that researchers and policymakers should look to Colorado's AMV approach as an effective model for boosting aggregate turnout and reducing voting disparities across subgroups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9756790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97567902022-12-16 All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() Bonica, Adam Grumbach, Jacob M. Hill, Charlotte Jefferson, Hakeem Elect Stud Article The COVID-19 crisis has generated interest in all-mail voting (AMV) as a potential policy solution for avoiding in-person elections. However, the quality of AMV implementation has varied greatly across states, leading to mixed results in previous research. We exploit the understudied 2014 implementation of AMV in Colorado to estimate the effect on turnout for all registered voters, along with age, racial, education, income and wealth, and occupational subgroups. Using large voter file data and a difference-in-differences design within individuals, we find a positive overall turnout effect of approximately 8 percentage points—translating into an additional 900,000 ballots being cast between 2014 and 2018. Effects are significantly larger among lower-propensity voting groups, such as young people, blue-collar workers, voters with less educational attainment, and voters of color. The results suggest that researchers and policymakers should look to Colorado's AMV approach as an effective model for boosting aggregate turnout and reducing voting disparities across subgroups. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-08 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9756790/ /pubmed/36540291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102363 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Bonica, Adam Grumbach, Jacob M. Hill, Charlotte Jefferson, Hakeem All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() |
title | All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() |
title_full | All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() |
title_fullStr | All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() |
title_full_unstemmed | All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() |
title_short | All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() |
title_sort | all-mail voting in colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9756790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonicaadam allmailvotingincoloradoincreasesturnoutandreducesturnoutinequality AT grumbachjacobm allmailvotingincoloradoincreasesturnoutandreducesturnoutinequality AT hillcharlotte allmailvotingincoloradoincreasesturnoutandreducesturnoutinequality AT jeffersonhakeem allmailvotingincoloradoincreasesturnoutandreducesturnoutinequality |