Cargando…

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is prevalent in conflict zones due to a lack of essential resources and knowledge, thereby escalating the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) cases in these territories. This has resulted in a higher incidence of cases from exposure to a single COVID-19 positive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siddiqui, Amna, Priya, Adnan, Alishba, Abbas, Samina, Qamar, Khulud, Islam, Zarmina, Rahmat, Zainab Syyeda, Essar, Mohammad Yasir, Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530665
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1006271
_version_ 1784851749700370432
author Siddiqui, Amna
Priya,
Adnan, Alishba
Abbas, Samina
Qamar, Khulud
Islam, Zarmina
Rahmat, Zainab Syyeda
Essar, Mohammad Yasir
Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez
author_facet Siddiqui, Amna
Priya,
Adnan, Alishba
Abbas, Samina
Qamar, Khulud
Islam, Zarmina
Rahmat, Zainab Syyeda
Essar, Mohammad Yasir
Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez
author_sort Siddiqui, Amna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is prevalent in conflict zones due to a lack of essential resources and knowledge, thereby escalating the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) cases in these territories. This has resulted in a higher incidence of cases from exposure to a single COVID-19 positive case and further burdens the health care system of conflict zones which are already on the brink of collapsing. AIM: This narrative review aims to determine VH to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in five conflict zones that include Somalia, Yemen, Palestine, Syria, and Afghanistan. METHODOLOGY: A Boolean search was carried out in MEDLINE-PubMed from inception till 6 June 2022. The search was performed by using the following keywords: “(SARS-CoV-2 OR covid OR covid 19) AND (vaccine hesitancy OR covid vaccine acceptance OR intention to vaccinate) AND (Syria OR Yemen OR Palestine OR Afghanistan OR Somalia”). The full text of all relevant articles in English along with their supplementary material was extracted. RESULTS: All the included studies reported at least 30% or more increase in vaccine hesitancy among conflict settings. VH was mostly due to a lack of available resources, lack of appropriate knowledge, and believing misleading rumors about the vaccine. DISCUSSION: Considering the massive amount of reluctance among people residing in conflict zones, the need to take effective measures against VH is undoubtedly apparent. This can be accomplished by carrying out mass vaccinations by the governments and proper health education through raising the public awareness regarding vaccines, thereby eliminating rumors that exacerbate the fear of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The approach described in this article to combat VH can be implemented to increase vaccination rates and significantly alleviate R(0) across the globe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9757058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97570582022-12-17 COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature Siddiqui, Amna Priya, Adnan, Alishba Abbas, Samina Qamar, Khulud Islam, Zarmina Rahmat, Zainab Syyeda Essar, Mohammad Yasir Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is prevalent in conflict zones due to a lack of essential resources and knowledge, thereby escalating the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) cases in these territories. This has resulted in a higher incidence of cases from exposure to a single COVID-19 positive case and further burdens the health care system of conflict zones which are already on the brink of collapsing. AIM: This narrative review aims to determine VH to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in five conflict zones that include Somalia, Yemen, Palestine, Syria, and Afghanistan. METHODOLOGY: A Boolean search was carried out in MEDLINE-PubMed from inception till 6 June 2022. The search was performed by using the following keywords: “(SARS-CoV-2 OR covid OR covid 19) AND (vaccine hesitancy OR covid vaccine acceptance OR intention to vaccinate) AND (Syria OR Yemen OR Palestine OR Afghanistan OR Somalia”). The full text of all relevant articles in English along with their supplementary material was extracted. RESULTS: All the included studies reported at least 30% or more increase in vaccine hesitancy among conflict settings. VH was mostly due to a lack of available resources, lack of appropriate knowledge, and believing misleading rumors about the vaccine. DISCUSSION: Considering the massive amount of reluctance among people residing in conflict zones, the need to take effective measures against VH is undoubtedly apparent. This can be accomplished by carrying out mass vaccinations by the governments and proper health education through raising the public awareness regarding vaccines, thereby eliminating rumors that exacerbate the fear of adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The approach described in this article to combat VH can be implemented to increase vaccination rates and significantly alleviate R(0) across the globe. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9757058/ /pubmed/36530665 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1006271 Text en Copyright © 2022 Siddiqui, Priya, Adnan, Abbas, Qamar, Islam, Rahmat, Essar and Farahat. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Siddiqui, Amna
Priya,
Adnan, Alishba
Abbas, Samina
Qamar, Khulud
Islam, Zarmina
Rahmat, Zainab Syyeda
Essar, Mohammad Yasir
Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature
title COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature
title_full COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature
title_fullStr COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature
title_short COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature
title_sort covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: a review of current literature
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530665
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1006271
work_keys_str_mv AT siddiquiamna covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT priya covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT adnanalishba covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT abbassamina covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT qamarkhulud covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT islamzarmina covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT rahmatzainabsyyeda covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT essarmohammadyasir covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT farahatramadanabdelmoez covid19vaccinehesitancyinconflictzonesareviewofcurrentliterature