Cargando…

Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey

Improved food security and nutrition remain a notable global challenge. Yet, food security and nutrition are areas of strategic importance regarding the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. The increasingly weakening global food production systems pose a threat to sustainable improved food...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekabira, Haruna, Nansubuga, Zainab, Ddungu, Stanley Peter, Nazziwa, Lydia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36525440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279358
_version_ 1784851852156731392
author Sekabira, Haruna
Nansubuga, Zainab
Ddungu, Stanley Peter
Nazziwa, Lydia
author_facet Sekabira, Haruna
Nansubuga, Zainab
Ddungu, Stanley Peter
Nazziwa, Lydia
author_sort Sekabira, Haruna
collection PubMed
description Improved food security and nutrition remain a notable global challenge. Yet, food security and nutrition are areas of strategic importance regarding the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. The increasingly weakening global food production systems pose a threat to sustainable improved food security and nutrition. Consequently, a significant population remains chronically hungry and severely malnourished. As a remedy, farm production diversity (FPD) remains a viable pathway through which household nutrition can be improved. However, evidence is mixed, or unavailable on how FPD is associated with key nutrition indicators like household dietary diversity, energy, iron, zinc, and vitamin A (micronutrients). We use the Uganda National Panel Survey (UNPS) data for rural households to analyze differential associations of sub-components of FPD on dietary diversity, energy, and micronutrient intake. Panel data models reveal that indeed crop species count, and animal species count (sub-components of FPD) are differently associated with household dietary diversity score (HDDS), energy, and vitamin A sourced from markets. Moreover, when volumes of these nutrition outcomes were disaggregated by source (own farm vs. markets), the animal species count was only positively significantly associated with nutrition outcomes sourced from consumption of produce from own farm. Associations were insignificant for nutrition indicators sourced from markets except vitamin A. The crop species count, however, consistently showed a strong positive and significant association with energy, and all studied micronutrients sourced from own farm produce consumption, as well as those sourced from markets except Vitamin A, which was negative but insignificant. Therefore, inclusive, pro-poor, and pro-nutrition rural policy initiatives in the context of rural Uganda and similar ones, could more widely improve household nutrition through prioritizing crop species diversification on own farms because crops fetch wider nutrition gains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9757588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97575882022-12-17 Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey Sekabira, Haruna Nansubuga, Zainab Ddungu, Stanley Peter Nazziwa, Lydia PLoS One Research Article Improved food security and nutrition remain a notable global challenge. Yet, food security and nutrition are areas of strategic importance regarding the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. The increasingly weakening global food production systems pose a threat to sustainable improved food security and nutrition. Consequently, a significant population remains chronically hungry and severely malnourished. As a remedy, farm production diversity (FPD) remains a viable pathway through which household nutrition can be improved. However, evidence is mixed, or unavailable on how FPD is associated with key nutrition indicators like household dietary diversity, energy, iron, zinc, and vitamin A (micronutrients). We use the Uganda National Panel Survey (UNPS) data for rural households to analyze differential associations of sub-components of FPD on dietary diversity, energy, and micronutrient intake. Panel data models reveal that indeed crop species count, and animal species count (sub-components of FPD) are differently associated with household dietary diversity score (HDDS), energy, and vitamin A sourced from markets. Moreover, when volumes of these nutrition outcomes were disaggregated by source (own farm vs. markets), the animal species count was only positively significantly associated with nutrition outcomes sourced from consumption of produce from own farm. Associations were insignificant for nutrition indicators sourced from markets except vitamin A. The crop species count, however, consistently showed a strong positive and significant association with energy, and all studied micronutrients sourced from own farm produce consumption, as well as those sourced from markets except Vitamin A, which was negative but insignificant. Therefore, inclusive, pro-poor, and pro-nutrition rural policy initiatives in the context of rural Uganda and similar ones, could more widely improve household nutrition through prioritizing crop species diversification on own farms because crops fetch wider nutrition gains. Public Library of Science 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9757588/ /pubmed/36525440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279358 Text en © 2022 Sekabira et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sekabira, Haruna
Nansubuga, Zainab
Ddungu, Stanley Peter
Nazziwa, Lydia
Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey
title Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey
title_full Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey
title_fullStr Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey
title_full_unstemmed Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey
title_short Farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: Evidence from Uganda’s national panel survey
title_sort farm production diversity, household dietary diversity, and nutrition: evidence from uganda’s national panel survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36525440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279358
work_keys_str_mv AT sekabiraharuna farmproductiondiversityhouseholddietarydiversityandnutritionevidencefromugandasnationalpanelsurvey
AT nansubugazainab farmproductiondiversityhouseholddietarydiversityandnutritionevidencefromugandasnationalpanelsurvey
AT ddungustanleypeter farmproductiondiversityhouseholddietarydiversityandnutritionevidencefromugandasnationalpanelsurvey
AT nazziwalydia farmproductiondiversityhouseholddietarydiversityandnutritionevidencefromugandasnationalpanelsurvey