Cargando…
#ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex
Recent research indicates that some young people initially learn about sexual choking through Internet memes. Thus, a qualitative content analysis was performed on 316 visual and textual memes collected from various social media websites and online searches to assess salient categories related to ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02502-5 |
_version_ | 1784851863054581760 |
---|---|
author | Herbenick, Debby Guerra-Reyes, Lucia Patterson, Callie Wilson, Jodi Rosenstock Gonzalez, Yael R. Voorheis, Eva Whitcomb, Maddy Kump, Rachel Theis, Evan Rothman, Emily F. Nelson, Kimberly M. Maas, Megan K. |
author_facet | Herbenick, Debby Guerra-Reyes, Lucia Patterson, Callie Wilson, Jodi Rosenstock Gonzalez, Yael R. Voorheis, Eva Whitcomb, Maddy Kump, Rachel Theis, Evan Rothman, Emily F. Nelson, Kimberly M. Maas, Megan K. |
author_sort | Herbenick, Debby |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent research indicates that some young people initially learn about sexual choking through Internet memes. Thus, a qualitative content analysis was performed on 316 visual and textual memes collected from various social media websites and online searches to assess salient categories related to choking during sex. We identified nine main categories: communication, gendered dynamics, choking as dangerous, choking as sexy, sexualization of the nonsexual, shame and worry, romance/rough sex juxtaposition, choking and religious references, instructional/informational. Given that memes, through their humor, can make difficult topics more palatable and minimize potential harm in the phenomenon they depict, more concerted, synergistic effort that integrates media literacy into sexuality education programming on the potential risks that may ensue for those engaging in sexual choking is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10508-022-02502-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9757635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97576352022-12-19 #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex Herbenick, Debby Guerra-Reyes, Lucia Patterson, Callie Wilson, Jodi Rosenstock Gonzalez, Yael R. Voorheis, Eva Whitcomb, Maddy Kump, Rachel Theis, Evan Rothman, Emily F. Nelson, Kimberly M. Maas, Megan K. Arch Sex Behav Original Paper Recent research indicates that some young people initially learn about sexual choking through Internet memes. Thus, a qualitative content analysis was performed on 316 visual and textual memes collected from various social media websites and online searches to assess salient categories related to choking during sex. We identified nine main categories: communication, gendered dynamics, choking as dangerous, choking as sexy, sexualization of the nonsexual, shame and worry, romance/rough sex juxtaposition, choking and religious references, instructional/informational. Given that memes, through their humor, can make difficult topics more palatable and minimize potential harm in the phenomenon they depict, more concerted, synergistic effort that integrates media literacy into sexuality education programming on the potential risks that may ensue for those engaging in sexual choking is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10508-022-02502-5. Springer US 2022-12-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9757635/ /pubmed/36526942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02502-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Herbenick, Debby Guerra-Reyes, Lucia Patterson, Callie Wilson, Jodi Rosenstock Gonzalez, Yael R. Voorheis, Eva Whitcomb, Maddy Kump, Rachel Theis, Evan Rothman, Emily F. Nelson, Kimberly M. Maas, Megan K. #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex |
title | #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex |
title_full | #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex |
title_fullStr | #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex |
title_full_unstemmed | #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex |
title_short | #ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex |
title_sort | #chokemedaddy: a content analysis of memes related to choking/strangulation during sex |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02502-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herbenickdebby chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT guerrareyeslucia chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT pattersoncallie chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT wilsonjodi chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT rosenstockgonzalezyaelr chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT voorheiseva chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT whitcombmaddy chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT kumprachel chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT theisevan chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT rothmanemilyf chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT nelsonkimberlym chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex AT maasmegank chokemedaddyacontentanalysisofmemesrelatedtochokingstrangulationduringsex |