Cargando…

An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata()

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a principal element of the fiscal stimulus enacted by Congress in response to the COVID-19 economic shock, was intended to assist small businesses to maintain employment and wages during the crisis, as well as cover other expenses. We use high-frequency adminis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Autor, David, Cho, David, Crane, Leland D., Goldar, Mita, Lutz, Byron, Montes, Joshua, Peterman, William B., Ratner, David, Villar, Daniel, Yildirmaz, Ahu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104664
_version_ 1784851867354791936
author Autor, David
Cho, David
Crane, Leland D.
Goldar, Mita
Lutz, Byron
Montes, Joshua
Peterman, William B.
Ratner, David
Villar, Daniel
Yildirmaz, Ahu
author_facet Autor, David
Cho, David
Crane, Leland D.
Goldar, Mita
Lutz, Byron
Montes, Joshua
Peterman, William B.
Ratner, David
Villar, Daniel
Yildirmaz, Ahu
author_sort Autor, David
collection PubMed
description The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a principal element of the fiscal stimulus enacted by Congress in response to the COVID-19 economic shock, was intended to assist small businesses to maintain employment and wages during the crisis, as well as cover other expenses. We use high-frequency administrative payroll data from ADP—one of the world’s largest payroll processing firms—to estimate the causal effect of the PPP on the evolution of employment at PPP-eligible firms relative to PPP-ineligible firms, where eligibility is determined by industry-specific firm-size cutoffs. Our estimates indicate that the PPP boosted employment at eligible firms by between 2 percent to 5 percent at its peak effect around mid-May 2020. The boost to employment waned thereafter and ranged from no effect to a 3 percent boost at the end of 2020. Our estimates imply that employers retained an additional 3.6 million jobs as of mid-May 2020, and 1.4 million jobs at the end of 2020, as a consequence of PPP. The estimated cost per year of employment retained was [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] , equal to 3.4 to 5.2 times median earnings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9757653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97576532022-12-19 An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata() Autor, David Cho, David Crane, Leland D. Goldar, Mita Lutz, Byron Montes, Joshua Peterman, William B. Ratner, David Villar, Daniel Yildirmaz, Ahu J Public Econ Article The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a principal element of the fiscal stimulus enacted by Congress in response to the COVID-19 economic shock, was intended to assist small businesses to maintain employment and wages during the crisis, as well as cover other expenses. We use high-frequency administrative payroll data from ADP—one of the world’s largest payroll processing firms—to estimate the causal effect of the PPP on the evolution of employment at PPP-eligible firms relative to PPP-ineligible firms, where eligibility is determined by industry-specific firm-size cutoffs. Our estimates indicate that the PPP boosted employment at eligible firms by between 2 percent to 5 percent at its peak effect around mid-May 2020. The boost to employment waned thereafter and ranged from no effect to a 3 percent boost at the end of 2020. Our estimates imply that employers retained an additional 3.6 million jobs as of mid-May 2020, and 1.4 million jobs at the end of 2020, as a consequence of PPP. The estimated cost per year of employment retained was [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] , equal to 3.4 to 5.2 times median earnings. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-07 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9757653/ /pubmed/36568439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104664 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Autor, David
Cho, David
Crane, Leland D.
Goldar, Mita
Lutz, Byron
Montes, Joshua
Peterman, William B.
Ratner, David
Villar, Daniel
Yildirmaz, Ahu
An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata()
title An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata()
title_full An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata()
title_fullStr An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata()
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata()
title_short An evaluation of the Paycheck Protection Program using administrative payroll microdata()
title_sort evaluation of the paycheck protection program using administrative payroll microdata()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104664
work_keys_str_mv AT autordavid anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT chodavid anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT cranelelandd anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT goldarmita anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT lutzbyron anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT montesjoshua anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT petermanwilliamb anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT ratnerdavid anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT villardaniel anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT yildirmazahu anevaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT autordavid evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT chodavid evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT cranelelandd evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT goldarmita evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT lutzbyron evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT montesjoshua evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT petermanwilliamb evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT ratnerdavid evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT villardaniel evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata
AT yildirmazahu evaluationofthepaycheckprotectionprogramusingadministrativepayrollmicrodata