Cargando…

Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

PURPOSE: To compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women who had labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol or had spontaneous labor in our clinic. Material-Method. The records of 213 pregnant women, who were followed up in Acibadem Maslak University Hospital for vaginal delivery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ozbasli, Esra, Canturk, Melis, Aygun, Elif Ganime, Ozaltin, Selin, Gungor, Mete
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Hindawi 2022
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9757931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36531654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2826927

Ejemplares similares

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
por: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A Retrospective Cohort Study on Maternal and Neonatal Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19: Does the Gestational Age Affect the Outcome?
por: Ozbasli, Esra, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
por: Souza, Paulo César Praciano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
por: Zhang, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol, Intravenous Oxytocin, and Intravaginal Dinoprostone for Labor Induction in Pakistani Women
por: Wasim, Asad Ullah, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Effect of Different Luteal Phase Support Applications on Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer
por: Aygün, Elif Ganime, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
por: Shafqat, Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Wallstrom, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
por: Towns, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil
por: Silva, Tácito Augusto Godoy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study
por: Harman Crowell, Elizabeth H., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Induction of Labor in Primigravid Term Pregnancy with Misoprostol or Dinoprostone: A Comparative Study
por: Arif, Rizwana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study
por: Hallén, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
por: Lee, Howard Hao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor around term
por: Moon, Hanna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations
por: Stephenson, Megan L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
por: Wang, Xiu, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
por: Patte, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study
por: Schmidt, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Analysis of Variables that Influence the Success Rates of Induction of Labor with Misoprostol: A Retrospective Observational Study
por: Corrêa, Thayane Delazari, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical parameters for prediction of successful labor induction after application of intravaginal dinoprostone in nulliparous Chinese women
por: Hou, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Comparison of perioperative outcomes among robot-assisted, conventional laparoscopic, and abdominal/open myomectomies
por: Özbaşlı, Esra, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation—a randomized study
por: Anjali, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
por: Tabasi, Zohreh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35 weeks
por: Sire, Flavie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Women’s experiences and views of outpatient and inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A secondary qualitative study
por: Hægeland, Hanne A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Preventive induction of labor for non-urgent indications at term and maternal and neonatal outcomes
por: Zhang, Lin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
por: Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Impact of labor characteristics on maternal and neonatal outcomes of labor: A machine-learning model
por: Shazly, Sherif A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_t5ai2s224vfurj07b53n9smj1v