Cargando…
Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter?
OBJECTIVE: As preservation of cognitive functioning increasingly becomes important in the light of ameliorated survival after intracranial tumor treatments, identification of eloquent brain areas would enable optimization of these treatments. METHODS: This cohort study enrolled adult intracranial tu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36346497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04181-7 |
_version_ | 1784851965884235776 |
---|---|
author | Sleurs, Charlotte Zegers, Catharina M. L. Compter, Inge Dijkstra, Jeanette Anten, Monique H. M. E. Postma, Alida A. Schijns, Olaf E. M. G. Hoeben, Ann Sitskoorn, Margriet M. De Baene, Wouter De Roeck, Laurien Sunaert, Stefan Van Elmpt, Wouter Lambrecht, Maarten Eekers, Daniëlle B. P. |
author_facet | Sleurs, Charlotte Zegers, Catharina M. L. Compter, Inge Dijkstra, Jeanette Anten, Monique H. M. E. Postma, Alida A. Schijns, Olaf E. M. G. Hoeben, Ann Sitskoorn, Margriet M. De Baene, Wouter De Roeck, Laurien Sunaert, Stefan Van Elmpt, Wouter Lambrecht, Maarten Eekers, Daniëlle B. P. |
author_sort | Sleurs, Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: As preservation of cognitive functioning increasingly becomes important in the light of ameliorated survival after intracranial tumor treatments, identification of eloquent brain areas would enable optimization of these treatments. METHODS: This cohort study enrolled adult intracranial tumor patients who received neuropsychological assessments pre-irradiation, estimating processing speed, verbal fluency and memory. Anatomical magnetic resonance imaging scans were used for multivariate voxel-wise lesion-symptom predictions of the test scores (corrected for age, gender, educational level, histological subtype, surgery, and tumor volume). Potential effects of histological and molecular subtype and corresponding WHO grades on the risk of cognitive impairment were investigated using Chi square tests. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons (p < .001 and p < .05 for voxel- and cluster-level, resp.). RESULTS: A cohort of 179 intracranial tumor patients was included [aged 19–85 years, median age (SD) = 58.46 (14.62), 50% females]. In this cohort, test-specific impairment was detected in 20–30% of patients. Higher WHO grade was associated with lower processing speed, cognitive flexibility and delayed memory in gliomas, while no acute surgery-effects were found. No grading, nor surgery effects were found in meningiomas. The voxel-wise analyses showed that tumor locations in left temporal areas and right temporo-parietal areas were related to verbal memory and processing speed, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Patients with intracranial tumors affecting the left temporal areas and right temporo-parietal areas might specifically be vulnerable for lower verbal memory and processing speed. These specific patients at-risk might benefit from early-stage interventions. Furthermore, based on future validation studies, imaging-informed surgical and radiotherapy planning could further be improved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04181-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9758085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97580852022-12-18 Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? Sleurs, Charlotte Zegers, Catharina M. L. Compter, Inge Dijkstra, Jeanette Anten, Monique H. M. E. Postma, Alida A. Schijns, Olaf E. M. G. Hoeben, Ann Sitskoorn, Margriet M. De Baene, Wouter De Roeck, Laurien Sunaert, Stefan Van Elmpt, Wouter Lambrecht, Maarten Eekers, Daniëlle B. P. J Neurooncol Research OBJECTIVE: As preservation of cognitive functioning increasingly becomes important in the light of ameliorated survival after intracranial tumor treatments, identification of eloquent brain areas would enable optimization of these treatments. METHODS: This cohort study enrolled adult intracranial tumor patients who received neuropsychological assessments pre-irradiation, estimating processing speed, verbal fluency and memory. Anatomical magnetic resonance imaging scans were used for multivariate voxel-wise lesion-symptom predictions of the test scores (corrected for age, gender, educational level, histological subtype, surgery, and tumor volume). Potential effects of histological and molecular subtype and corresponding WHO grades on the risk of cognitive impairment were investigated using Chi square tests. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons (p < .001 and p < .05 for voxel- and cluster-level, resp.). RESULTS: A cohort of 179 intracranial tumor patients was included [aged 19–85 years, median age (SD) = 58.46 (14.62), 50% females]. In this cohort, test-specific impairment was detected in 20–30% of patients. Higher WHO grade was associated with lower processing speed, cognitive flexibility and delayed memory in gliomas, while no acute surgery-effects were found. No grading, nor surgery effects were found in meningiomas. The voxel-wise analyses showed that tumor locations in left temporal areas and right temporo-parietal areas were related to verbal memory and processing speed, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Patients with intracranial tumors affecting the left temporal areas and right temporo-parietal areas might specifically be vulnerable for lower verbal memory and processing speed. These specific patients at-risk might benefit from early-stage interventions. Furthermore, based on future validation studies, imaging-informed surgical and radiotherapy planning could further be improved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04181-7. Springer US 2022-11-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9758085/ /pubmed/36346497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04181-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Sleurs, Charlotte Zegers, Catharina M. L. Compter, Inge Dijkstra, Jeanette Anten, Monique H. M. E. Postma, Alida A. Schijns, Olaf E. M. G. Hoeben, Ann Sitskoorn, Margriet M. De Baene, Wouter De Roeck, Laurien Sunaert, Stefan Van Elmpt, Wouter Lambrecht, Maarten Eekers, Daniëlle B. P. Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? |
title | Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? |
title_full | Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? |
title_fullStr | Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? |
title_short | Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? |
title_sort | neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36346497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04181-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sleurscharlotte neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT zegerscatharinaml neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT compteringe neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT dijkstrajeanette neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT antenmoniquehme neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT postmaalidaa neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT schijnsolafemg neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT hoebenann neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT sitskoornmargrietm neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT debaenewouter neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT deroecklaurien neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT sunaertstefan neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT vanelmptwouter neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT lambrechtmaarten neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter AT eekersdaniellebp neurocognitioninadultswithintracranialtumorsdoeslocationreallymatter |