Assessment of the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Filipino obstetrics and gynecology residents on fertility preservation: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: As primary reproductive healthcare providers, residents-in-training must be equipped with the knowledge of proven and available methods for fertility preservation. The study evaluated Filipino obstetrics and gynecology residents' current knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about fertility preservation. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among obstetrics and gynecology residents in the Philippines. A 24-item questionnaire was distributed to the different accredited training institutions of the Philippine Obstetrical and Gynecological Society by electronic mail. Univariate descriptive statistics were reported as mean for continuous variables and frequency with percentage for categorical variables. The chi-square test was used to determine differences in responses. RESULTS: A total of 143 respondents from different year levels of training were enrolled in the study. Most were female trainees (88.11%) from the National Capital Region (44.76%). Most respondents agreed that discussions about childbearing intentions (99.30%) and age-related fertility decline (98.60%) should be initiated during a patient's gynecological consult. Residents were most familiar with oocyte freezing (84.62%), fertility-sparing surgeries (83.22%), and the use of GnRH agonists (80.42%) as fertility preservation techniques. Despite being most familiar with oocyte freezing, the respondents have mainly referred patients for fertility-sparing surgeries (48.95%) and the use of GnRH agonists (48.25%). CONCLUSIONS: There was an overall reassuring perception and attitude of obstetrics and gynecology residents on fertility preservation. A standardized curriculum with teaching-learning activities on fertility preservation may be used to improve trainees' knowledge. There was a disparity in the knowledge and actual referral or utilization of the different methods, reflecting the inaccessibility of the procedures specific to their institutions. This highlights the need to improve accessibility and offer fertility preservation as a public health service.