Cargando…
COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic in the last three years. The lack of reliable evidence on the risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19 has become a concern for patients and obstetricians. We sought to identify rigorous evidence using two-sample Mendelian random...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x |
_version_ | 1784852046733639680 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Huangcong Zhao, Hui Zhang, Wei Wang, Shan |
author_facet | Shi, Huangcong Zhao, Hui Zhang, Wei Wang, Shan |
author_sort | Shi, Huangcong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic in the last three years. The lack of reliable evidence on the risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19 has become a concern for patients and obstetricians. We sought to identify rigorous evidence using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. METHODS: Seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with COVID-19 were used as instrumental variables to explore causality by two-sample MR. The summary data of genetic variants were obtained from the Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) among European populations in the UK Biobank and EBI database. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was taken as the gold standard for MR results, and other methods were taken as auxiliary. We also performed sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of MR. RESULTS: The MR analysis showed there was no clear causal association between COVID-19 and miscarriage in the genetic prediction [OR 0.9981 (95% CI, 0.9872–1.0091), p = 0.7336]. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the MR results were robust [horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger, intercept = 0.0001592; se = 0.0023; p = 0.9480)]. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from MR does not support COVID-19 as a causal risk factor for miscarriage in European populations. The small probability of direct placental infection, as well as the inability to stratify the data may explain the results of MR. These findings can be informative for obstetricians when managing women in labor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9758471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97584712022-12-19 COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study Shi, Huangcong Zhao, Hui Zhang, Wei Wang, Shan J Assist Reprod Genet Reproductive Physiology and Disease OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic in the last three years. The lack of reliable evidence on the risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19 has become a concern for patients and obstetricians. We sought to identify rigorous evidence using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. METHODS: Seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with COVID-19 were used as instrumental variables to explore causality by two-sample MR. The summary data of genetic variants were obtained from the Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) among European populations in the UK Biobank and EBI database. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was taken as the gold standard for MR results, and other methods were taken as auxiliary. We also performed sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of MR. RESULTS: The MR analysis showed there was no clear causal association between COVID-19 and miscarriage in the genetic prediction [OR 0.9981 (95% CI, 0.9872–1.0091), p = 0.7336]. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the MR results were robust [horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger, intercept = 0.0001592; se = 0.0023; p = 0.9480)]. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from MR does not support COVID-19 as a causal risk factor for miscarriage in European populations. The small probability of direct placental infection, as well as the inability to stratify the data may explain the results of MR. These findings can be informative for obstetricians when managing women in labor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x. Springer US 2022-12-17 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9758471/ /pubmed/36527564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Physiology and Disease Shi, Huangcong Zhao, Hui Zhang, Wei Wang, Shan COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study |
title | COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study |
title_full | COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study |
title_short | COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study |
title_sort | covid-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a mendelian randomization study |
topic | Reproductive Physiology and Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shihuangcong covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy AT zhaohui covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy AT zhangwei covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy AT wangshan covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy |