Cargando…

COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic in the last three years. The lack of reliable evidence on the risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19 has become a concern for patients and obstetricians. We sought to identify rigorous evidence using two-sample Mendelian random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Huangcong, Zhao, Hui, Zhang, Wei, Wang, Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x
_version_ 1784852046733639680
author Shi, Huangcong
Zhao, Hui
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Shan
author_facet Shi, Huangcong
Zhao, Hui
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Shan
author_sort Shi, Huangcong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic in the last three years. The lack of reliable evidence on the risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19 has become a concern for patients and obstetricians. We sought to identify rigorous evidence using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. METHODS: Seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with COVID-19 were used as instrumental variables to explore causality by two-sample MR. The summary data of genetic variants were obtained from the Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) among European populations in the UK Biobank and EBI database. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was taken as the gold standard for MR results, and other methods were taken as auxiliary. We also performed sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of MR. RESULTS: The MR analysis showed there was no clear causal association between COVID-19 and miscarriage in the genetic prediction [OR 0.9981 (95% CI, 0.9872–1.0091), p = 0.7336]. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the MR results were robust [horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger, intercept = 0.0001592; se = 0.0023; p = 0.9480)]. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from MR does not support COVID-19 as a causal risk factor for miscarriage in European populations. The small probability of direct placental infection, as well as the inability to stratify the data may explain the results of MR. These findings can be informative for obstetricians when managing women in labor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9758471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97584712022-12-19 COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study Shi, Huangcong Zhao, Hui Zhang, Wei Wang, Shan J Assist Reprod Genet Reproductive Physiology and Disease OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic in the last three years. The lack of reliable evidence on the risk of miscarriage due to COVID-19 has become a concern for patients and obstetricians. We sought to identify rigorous evidence using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. METHODS: Seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with COVID-19 were used as instrumental variables to explore causality by two-sample MR. The summary data of genetic variants were obtained from the Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) among European populations in the UK Biobank and EBI database. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was taken as the gold standard for MR results, and other methods were taken as auxiliary. We also performed sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of MR. RESULTS: The MR analysis showed there was no clear causal association between COVID-19 and miscarriage in the genetic prediction [OR 0.9981 (95% CI, 0.9872–1.0091), p = 0.7336]. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the MR results were robust [horizontal pleiotropy (MR-Egger, intercept = 0.0001592; se = 0.0023; p = 0.9480)]. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from MR does not support COVID-19 as a causal risk factor for miscarriage in European populations. The small probability of direct placental infection, as well as the inability to stratify the data may explain the results of MR. These findings can be informative for obstetricians when managing women in labor. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x. Springer US 2022-12-17 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9758471/ /pubmed/36527564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
spellingShingle Reproductive Physiology and Disease
Shi, Huangcong
Zhao, Hui
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Shan
COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
title COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
title_full COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
title_fullStr COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
title_short COVID-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a Mendelian randomization study
title_sort covid-19 is not a causal risk for miscarriage: evidence from a mendelian randomization study
topic Reproductive Physiology and Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02675-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shihuangcong covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT zhaohui covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT zhangwei covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT wangshan covid19isnotacausalriskformiscarriageevidencefromamendelianrandomizationstudy