Cargando…

Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND: A clinical pregnancy prediction model was developed by implementing machine learning technology that uses a combination of static images and medical data to calculate the outcome of an in vitro fertilization cycle. OBJECTIVE: To provide a system that can accurately and sufficiently assis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Louis, Claudio Michael, Handayani, Nining, Aprilliana, Tri, Polim, Arie A., Boediono, Arief, Sini, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100133
_version_ 1784852050237980672
author Louis, Claudio Michael
Handayani, Nining
Aprilliana, Tri
Polim, Arie A.
Boediono, Arief
Sini, Ivan
author_facet Louis, Claudio Michael
Handayani, Nining
Aprilliana, Tri
Polim, Arie A.
Boediono, Arief
Sini, Ivan
author_sort Louis, Claudio Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A clinical pregnancy prediction model was developed by implementing machine learning technology that uses a combination of static images and medical data to calculate the outcome of an in vitro fertilization cycle. OBJECTIVE: To provide a system that can accurately and sufficiently assist with decision making that is critical to in vitro fertilization cycles, primarily embryo selection. STUDY DESIGN: Historical medical data, which consist of clinical information and a complete transferred embryo image dataset, of 697 patients who underwent unique in vitro fertilization were collected. Various techniques of machine learning were used, namely decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting; each technique used the same data configuration for performance comparison and was subsequently optimized using genetic algorithm. RESULTS: A prediction model with a peak accuracy of approximately 65% was achieved. Significant differences in the performances of the 3 selected algorithms were apparent. Nonetheless, additional metric measurements, such as receiver operating characteristic, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score, accuracy, and loss, suggested that the gradient boosting model performed the best in predicting clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSION: This study served as a stepping stone toward the application of in vitro fertilization prediction models that use machine learning techniques. However, additional validation steps are required to boost the model's performance for its implementation in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9758485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97584852022-12-18 Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization Louis, Claudio Michael Handayani, Nining Aprilliana, Tri Polim, Arie A. Boediono, Arief Sini, Ivan AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: A clinical pregnancy prediction model was developed by implementing machine learning technology that uses a combination of static images and medical data to calculate the outcome of an in vitro fertilization cycle. OBJECTIVE: To provide a system that can accurately and sufficiently assist with decision making that is critical to in vitro fertilization cycles, primarily embryo selection. STUDY DESIGN: Historical medical data, which consist of clinical information and a complete transferred embryo image dataset, of 697 patients who underwent unique in vitro fertilization were collected. Various techniques of machine learning were used, namely decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting; each technique used the same data configuration for performance comparison and was subsequently optimized using genetic algorithm. RESULTS: A prediction model with a peak accuracy of approximately 65% was achieved. Significant differences in the performances of the 3 selected algorithms were apparent. Nonetheless, additional metric measurements, such as receiver operating characteristic, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve score, accuracy, and loss, suggested that the gradient boosting model performed the best in predicting clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSION: This study served as a stepping stone toward the application of in vitro fertilization prediction models that use machine learning techniques. However, additional validation steps are required to boost the model's performance for its implementation in the clinical setting. Elsevier 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9758485/ /pubmed/36536794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100133 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Louis, Claudio Michael
Handayani, Nining
Aprilliana, Tri
Polim, Arie A.
Boediono, Arief
Sini, Ivan
Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization
title Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization
title_full Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization
title_fullStr Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization
title_full_unstemmed Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization
title_short Genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization
title_sort genetic algorithm–assisted machine learning for clinical pregnancy prediction in in vitro fertilization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100133
work_keys_str_mv AT louisclaudiomichael geneticalgorithmassistedmachinelearningforclinicalpregnancypredictionininvitrofertilization
AT handayaninining geneticalgorithmassistedmachinelearningforclinicalpregnancypredictionininvitrofertilization
AT aprillianatri geneticalgorithmassistedmachinelearningforclinicalpregnancypredictionininvitrofertilization
AT polimariea geneticalgorithmassistedmachinelearningforclinicalpregnancypredictionininvitrofertilization
AT boedionoarief geneticalgorithmassistedmachinelearningforclinicalpregnancypredictionininvitrofertilization
AT siniivan geneticalgorithmassistedmachinelearningforclinicalpregnancypredictionininvitrofertilization