Cargando…

Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity poses a global health challenge. In recent years, there has been an increase in interventions that begin in pregnancy, putting the concept of early programming and early risk factors into practice. The present study aims to update the findings regarding interventions in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Muñoz, Celia, Carretero-Bravo, Jesús, Ortega-Martín, Esther, Ramos-Fiol, Begoña, Ferriz-Mas, Bernardo, Díaz-Rodríguez, Mercedes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14701-9
_version_ 1784852138078240768
author Pérez-Muñoz, Celia
Carretero-Bravo, Jesús
Ortega-Martín, Esther
Ramos-Fiol, Begoña
Ferriz-Mas, Bernardo
Díaz-Rodríguez, Mercedes
author_facet Pérez-Muñoz, Celia
Carretero-Bravo, Jesús
Ortega-Martín, Esther
Ramos-Fiol, Begoña
Ferriz-Mas, Bernardo
Díaz-Rodríguez, Mercedes
author_sort Pérez-Muñoz, Celia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity poses a global health challenge. In recent years, there has been an increase in interventions that begin in pregnancy, putting the concept of early programming and early risk factors into practice. The present study aims to update the findings regarding interventions in the first 1000 days of life. METHODS: A systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines was carried out in PubMed, WoS, Scopus and CINAHL to obtain the articles to be analysed. We included those studies published between 2016 and 2021. Human interventions that started within the first 1000 days of life and acted on at least one programming factor were included. Once selected, coding and quantitative content analysis was carried out to obtain a profile of the interventions during the first 1000 days. RESULTS: From all screened articles, 51 unique interventions, which met the selection criteria, were included. The majority of interventions (81%) took place in high-income areas. Almost all (86%) were targeted at the general population. The majority (54%) started in the second trimester of pregnancy. A clear majority (61%) ended at the time of birth. 44% of the interventions included all pregnant women. Only 48% of these interventions were focused on improving the nutritional status of the offspring in the short term. Most interventions collected the baby's weight at birth (68%). CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that current interventions are not covering as many aspects as they should. Future research should be conducted more frequently in developing countries and target disadvantaged groups. These interventions should include all pregnant women, regardless of their nutritional status, aiming to cover as many programming factors as possible and extending through the first 1000 days of life, with body mass index or skinfolds as measures of effectiveness during this period. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14701-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9758903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97589032022-12-18 Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis Pérez-Muñoz, Celia Carretero-Bravo, Jesús Ortega-Martín, Esther Ramos-Fiol, Begoña Ferriz-Mas, Bernardo Díaz-Rodríguez, Mercedes BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity poses a global health challenge. In recent years, there has been an increase in interventions that begin in pregnancy, putting the concept of early programming and early risk factors into practice. The present study aims to update the findings regarding interventions in the first 1000 days of life. METHODS: A systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines was carried out in PubMed, WoS, Scopus and CINAHL to obtain the articles to be analysed. We included those studies published between 2016 and 2021. Human interventions that started within the first 1000 days of life and acted on at least one programming factor were included. Once selected, coding and quantitative content analysis was carried out to obtain a profile of the interventions during the first 1000 days. RESULTS: From all screened articles, 51 unique interventions, which met the selection criteria, were included. The majority of interventions (81%) took place in high-income areas. Almost all (86%) were targeted at the general population. The majority (54%) started in the second trimester of pregnancy. A clear majority (61%) ended at the time of birth. 44% of the interventions included all pregnant women. Only 48% of these interventions were focused on improving the nutritional status of the offspring in the short term. Most interventions collected the baby's weight at birth (68%). CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that current interventions are not covering as many aspects as they should. Future research should be conducted more frequently in developing countries and target disadvantaged groups. These interventions should include all pregnant women, regardless of their nutritional status, aiming to cover as many programming factors as possible and extending through the first 1000 days of life, with body mass index or skinfolds as measures of effectiveness during this period. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14701-9. BioMed Central 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9758903/ /pubmed/36527103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14701-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pérez-Muñoz, Celia
Carretero-Bravo, Jesús
Ortega-Martín, Esther
Ramos-Fiol, Begoña
Ferriz-Mas, Bernardo
Díaz-Rodríguez, Mercedes
Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis
title Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis
title_full Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis
title_fullStr Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis
title_full_unstemmed Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis
title_short Interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis
title_sort interventions in the first 1000 days to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14701-9
work_keys_str_mv AT perezmunozcelia interventionsinthefirst1000daystopreventchildhoodobesityasystematicreviewandquantitativecontentanalysis
AT carreterobravojesus interventionsinthefirst1000daystopreventchildhoodobesityasystematicreviewandquantitativecontentanalysis
AT ortegamartinesther interventionsinthefirst1000daystopreventchildhoodobesityasystematicreviewandquantitativecontentanalysis
AT ramosfiolbegona interventionsinthefirst1000daystopreventchildhoodobesityasystematicreviewandquantitativecontentanalysis
AT ferrizmasbernardo interventionsinthefirst1000daystopreventchildhoodobesityasystematicreviewandquantitativecontentanalysis
AT diazrodriguezmercedes interventionsinthefirst1000daystopreventchildhoodobesityasystematicreviewandquantitativecontentanalysis