Cargando…
Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes
BACKGROUND: Real-world data in form of routinely collected clinical data are a valuable resource for epidemiological research in infectious disease. We examined the validity of a discharge diagnosis of fever of unknown origin from hospital discharge registries. METHODS: We identified patients with a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S386328 |
_version_ | 1784852157555539968 |
---|---|
author | Gedebjerg, Anne Kirk, Karina Frahm Lassen, Pernille Overgaard Farkas, Dóra K Søgaard, Kirstine K |
author_facet | Gedebjerg, Anne Kirk, Karina Frahm Lassen, Pernille Overgaard Farkas, Dóra K Søgaard, Kirstine K |
author_sort | Gedebjerg, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Real-world data in form of routinely collected clinical data are a valuable resource for epidemiological research in infectious disease. We examined the validity of a discharge diagnosis of fever of unknown origin from hospital discharge registries. METHODS: We identified patients with a first in- or outpatient diagnosis (primary or secondary) of fever of unknown origin (ICD-10 code R50.0; R50.8, R50.9) recorded in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) between 2010 and 2017 in the North Denmark Region. We based the validation cohort on a mix of patients diagnosed at a highly specialized university department of infectious diseases (n=100), other internal medicine departments (n=50), and patients diagnosed at a regional non-university hospital (n=50). We estimate positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnosis for fever of unknown origin using medical records as reference. RESULTS: The PPV of a diagnosis of fever of unknown origin for patients diagnosed at the infectious disease department was 61% (95% CI: 51–71%). For other internal medicine departments, it was 14% (95% CI: 6–27%), and for the non-university hospital it was 16% (95% CI: 7–29%). To achieve higher PPVs, we excluded immunocompromised patients, patients who were diagnosed with infection, cancer or rheumatic disease within 7 days after admission, and/or patients with a short hospital stay (maximum 3 days) and no subsequent hospital contact within 1 month. The PPV for diagnoses from the Department of Infectious Diseases improved to 82% (95% CI: 68–91%) for other internal medicine departments it improved to 31% (95% CI: 11–59%), and for the non-university hospital it improved to 36% (95% CI: 13–65%). CONCLUSION: We found that only diagnoses made in the Department of Infectious Diseases accurately identified fever of unknown origin, whereas diagnoses made in other units mainly covered infection-related fever, cancer-related fever, or short unspecific fever without further diagnostic work-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9758992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97589922022-12-18 Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes Gedebjerg, Anne Kirk, Karina Frahm Lassen, Pernille Overgaard Farkas, Dóra K Søgaard, Kirstine K Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Real-world data in form of routinely collected clinical data are a valuable resource for epidemiological research in infectious disease. We examined the validity of a discharge diagnosis of fever of unknown origin from hospital discharge registries. METHODS: We identified patients with a first in- or outpatient diagnosis (primary or secondary) of fever of unknown origin (ICD-10 code R50.0; R50.8, R50.9) recorded in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) between 2010 and 2017 in the North Denmark Region. We based the validation cohort on a mix of patients diagnosed at a highly specialized university department of infectious diseases (n=100), other internal medicine departments (n=50), and patients diagnosed at a regional non-university hospital (n=50). We estimate positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnosis for fever of unknown origin using medical records as reference. RESULTS: The PPV of a diagnosis of fever of unknown origin for patients diagnosed at the infectious disease department was 61% (95% CI: 51–71%). For other internal medicine departments, it was 14% (95% CI: 6–27%), and for the non-university hospital it was 16% (95% CI: 7–29%). To achieve higher PPVs, we excluded immunocompromised patients, patients who were diagnosed with infection, cancer or rheumatic disease within 7 days after admission, and/or patients with a short hospital stay (maximum 3 days) and no subsequent hospital contact within 1 month. The PPV for diagnoses from the Department of Infectious Diseases improved to 82% (95% CI: 68–91%) for other internal medicine departments it improved to 31% (95% CI: 11–59%), and for the non-university hospital it improved to 36% (95% CI: 13–65%). CONCLUSION: We found that only diagnoses made in the Department of Infectious Diseases accurately identified fever of unknown origin, whereas diagnoses made in other units mainly covered infection-related fever, cancer-related fever, or short unspecific fever without further diagnostic work-up. Dove 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9758992/ /pubmed/36536896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S386328 Text en © 2022 Gedebjerg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gedebjerg, Anne Kirk, Karina Frahm Lassen, Pernille Overgaard Farkas, Dóra K Søgaard, Kirstine K Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes |
title | Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes |
title_full | Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes |
title_fullStr | Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes |
title_full_unstemmed | Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes |
title_short | Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes |
title_sort | fever of unknown origin: a validation study of danish icd-10 diagnosis codes |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S386328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gedebjerganne feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes AT kirkkarinafrahm feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes AT lassenpernilleovergaard feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes AT farkasdorak feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes AT søgaardkirstinek feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes |