Cargando…

Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes

BACKGROUND: Real-world data in form of routinely collected clinical data are a valuable resource for epidemiological research in infectious disease. We examined the validity of a discharge diagnosis of fever of unknown origin from hospital discharge registries. METHODS: We identified patients with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gedebjerg, Anne, Kirk, Karina Frahm, Lassen, Pernille Overgaard, Farkas, Dóra K, Søgaard, Kirstine K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S386328
_version_ 1784852157555539968
author Gedebjerg, Anne
Kirk, Karina Frahm
Lassen, Pernille Overgaard
Farkas, Dóra K
Søgaard, Kirstine K
author_facet Gedebjerg, Anne
Kirk, Karina Frahm
Lassen, Pernille Overgaard
Farkas, Dóra K
Søgaard, Kirstine K
author_sort Gedebjerg, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Real-world data in form of routinely collected clinical data are a valuable resource for epidemiological research in infectious disease. We examined the validity of a discharge diagnosis of fever of unknown origin from hospital discharge registries. METHODS: We identified patients with a first in- or outpatient diagnosis (primary or secondary) of fever of unknown origin (ICD-10 code R50.0; R50.8, R50.9) recorded in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) between 2010 and 2017 in the North Denmark Region. We based the validation cohort on a mix of patients diagnosed at a highly specialized university department of infectious diseases (n=100), other internal medicine departments (n=50), and patients diagnosed at a regional non-university hospital (n=50). We estimate positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnosis for fever of unknown origin using medical records as reference. RESULTS: The PPV of a diagnosis of fever of unknown origin for patients diagnosed at the infectious disease department was 61% (95% CI: 51–71%). For other internal medicine departments, it was 14% (95% CI: 6–27%), and for the non-university hospital it was 16% (95% CI: 7–29%). To achieve higher PPVs, we excluded immunocompromised patients, patients who were diagnosed with infection, cancer or rheumatic disease within 7 days after admission, and/or patients with a short hospital stay (maximum 3 days) and no subsequent hospital contact within 1 month. The PPV for diagnoses from the Department of Infectious Diseases improved to 82% (95% CI: 68–91%) for other internal medicine departments it improved to 31% (95% CI: 11–59%), and for the non-university hospital it improved to 36% (95% CI: 13–65%). CONCLUSION: We found that only diagnoses made in the Department of Infectious Diseases accurately identified fever of unknown origin, whereas diagnoses made in other units mainly covered infection-related fever, cancer-related fever, or short unspecific fever without further diagnostic work-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9758992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97589922022-12-18 Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes Gedebjerg, Anne Kirk, Karina Frahm Lassen, Pernille Overgaard Farkas, Dóra K Søgaard, Kirstine K Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Real-world data in form of routinely collected clinical data are a valuable resource for epidemiological research in infectious disease. We examined the validity of a discharge diagnosis of fever of unknown origin from hospital discharge registries. METHODS: We identified patients with a first in- or outpatient diagnosis (primary or secondary) of fever of unknown origin (ICD-10 code R50.0; R50.8, R50.9) recorded in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) between 2010 and 2017 in the North Denmark Region. We based the validation cohort on a mix of patients diagnosed at a highly specialized university department of infectious diseases (n=100), other internal medicine departments (n=50), and patients diagnosed at a regional non-university hospital (n=50). We estimate positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnosis for fever of unknown origin using medical records as reference. RESULTS: The PPV of a diagnosis of fever of unknown origin for patients diagnosed at the infectious disease department was 61% (95% CI: 51–71%). For other internal medicine departments, it was 14% (95% CI: 6–27%), and for the non-university hospital it was 16% (95% CI: 7–29%). To achieve higher PPVs, we excluded immunocompromised patients, patients who were diagnosed with infection, cancer or rheumatic disease within 7 days after admission, and/or patients with a short hospital stay (maximum 3 days) and no subsequent hospital contact within 1 month. The PPV for diagnoses from the Department of Infectious Diseases improved to 82% (95% CI: 68–91%) for other internal medicine departments it improved to 31% (95% CI: 11–59%), and for the non-university hospital it improved to 36% (95% CI: 13–65%). CONCLUSION: We found that only diagnoses made in the Department of Infectious Diseases accurately identified fever of unknown origin, whereas diagnoses made in other units mainly covered infection-related fever, cancer-related fever, or short unspecific fever without further diagnostic work-up. Dove 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9758992/ /pubmed/36536896 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S386328 Text en © 2022 Gedebjerg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Gedebjerg, Anne
Kirk, Karina Frahm
Lassen, Pernille Overgaard
Farkas, Dóra K
Søgaard, Kirstine K
Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes
title Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes
title_full Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes
title_fullStr Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes
title_full_unstemmed Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes
title_short Fever of Unknown Origin: A Validation Study of Danish ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes
title_sort fever of unknown origin: a validation study of danish icd-10 diagnosis codes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536896
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S386328
work_keys_str_mv AT gedebjerganne feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes
AT kirkkarinafrahm feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes
AT lassenpernilleovergaard feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes
AT farkasdorak feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes
AT søgaardkirstinek feverofunknownoriginavalidationstudyofdanishicd10diagnosiscodes