Cargando…
Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It?
The Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is a commonly used questionnaire to evaluate patients for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). The ESS has been validated as a measure of EDS, but a number of studies have shown more test–retest variability in clinical settings compared to the original validation st...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9759004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536636 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S340950 |
_version_ | 1784852159049760768 |
---|---|
author | Scharf, Matthew T |
author_facet | Scharf, Matthew T |
author_sort | Scharf, Matthew T |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is a commonly used questionnaire to evaluate patients for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). The ESS has been validated as a measure of EDS, but a number of studies have shown more test–retest variability in clinical settings compared to the original validation study. This observation of higher-than-expected test–retest variability has called into question the utility of the ESS as a clinical tool to assess EDS. The purpose of this review article is to summarize how studies of test–retest variability in clinical populations compare to the original validation study of Johns and to highlight where they differ. Furthermore, use of the ESS as a continuous variable (with no specified cutoff value) versus a categorical variable (normal versus high) is described. These observations are put into a clinical context by comparing the test–retest variability observed on the ESS with that of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). Finally, how contributors to ESS scores differ within certain subpopulations is described. The ESS remains an important tool to measure EDS in patient populations, but an awareness of its limitations needs to be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9759004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97590042022-12-18 Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It? Scharf, Matthew T Nat Sci Sleep Review The Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is a commonly used questionnaire to evaluate patients for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). The ESS has been validated as a measure of EDS, but a number of studies have shown more test–retest variability in clinical settings compared to the original validation study. This observation of higher-than-expected test–retest variability has called into question the utility of the ESS as a clinical tool to assess EDS. The purpose of this review article is to summarize how studies of test–retest variability in clinical populations compare to the original validation study of Johns and to highlight where they differ. Furthermore, use of the ESS as a continuous variable (with no specified cutoff value) versus a categorical variable (normal versus high) is described. These observations are put into a clinical context by comparing the test–retest variability observed on the ESS with that of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). Finally, how contributors to ESS scores differ within certain subpopulations is described. The ESS remains an important tool to measure EDS in patient populations, but an awareness of its limitations needs to be considered. Dove 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9759004/ /pubmed/36536636 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S340950 Text en © 2022 Scharf. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Scharf, Matthew T Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It? |
title | Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It? |
title_full | Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It? |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It? |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It? |
title_short | Reliability and Efficacy of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Is There Still a Place for It? |
title_sort | reliability and efficacy of the epworth sleepiness scale: is there still a place for it? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9759004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536636 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S340950 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scharfmatthewt reliabilityandefficacyoftheepworthsleepinessscaleistherestillaplaceforit |