Cargando…

Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?

BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke (AIS), rapid treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is crucial for good clinical outcome. Weekly simulation‐based team‐training of the stroke treatment team was implemented, resulting in faster treatment times. The aim of this study was to assess whether t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Høllesli, Liv Jorunn, Ajmi, Soffien Chadli, Kurz, Martin W., Tysland, Thomas Bailey, Hagir, Morten, Dalen, Ingvild, Qvindesland, Sigrun Anna, Ersdal, Hege, Kurz, Kathinka D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9759129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2814
_version_ 1784852180527742976
author Høllesli, Liv Jorunn
Ajmi, Soffien Chadli
Kurz, Martin W.
Tysland, Thomas Bailey
Hagir, Morten
Dalen, Ingvild
Qvindesland, Sigrun Anna
Ersdal, Hege
Kurz, Kathinka D.
author_facet Høllesli, Liv Jorunn
Ajmi, Soffien Chadli
Kurz, Martin W.
Tysland, Thomas Bailey
Hagir, Morten
Dalen, Ingvild
Qvindesland, Sigrun Anna
Ersdal, Hege
Kurz, Kathinka D.
author_sort Høllesli, Liv Jorunn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke (AIS), rapid treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is crucial for good clinical outcome. Weekly simulation‐based team‐training of the stroke treatment team was implemented, resulting in faster treatment times. The aim of this study was to assess whether this time reduction led to a higher proportion of stroke mimics (SMs) among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS, and whether these SM patients were harmed by intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: All suspected AIS patients treated with IVT between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 were prospectively registered. In 2017, weekly in situ simulation‐based team‐training involving the whole stroke treatment team was introduced. To analyze possible unintended effects of simulation training, the proportion of SMs among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS were identified by clinical and radiological evaluation. Additionally, we identified the extent of symptomatic ICH (sICH) in IVT‐treated SM patients. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2020, 959 patients were treated with IVT for symptoms of AIS. After introduction of simulation training, the proportion of patients treated with IVT who were later diagnosed as SMs increased significantly (15.9% vs. 24.4%, p = .003). There were no ICH complications in the SM patients treated before, whereas two SM patients suffered from asymptomatic ICH after introduction of simulation training (p = 1.0). When subgrouping SMs into prespecified categories, only the group diagnosed with peripheral vertigo increased significantly (2.5% vs. 8.6%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training of the acute stroke treatment team was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients treated with IVT for a suspected AIS who were later diagnosed with peripheral vertigo. The proportion of other SM groups among IVT‐treated patients did not change significantly. No sICH was detected in IVT‐treated SM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9759129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97591292022-12-20 Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up? Høllesli, Liv Jorunn Ajmi, Soffien Chadli Kurz, Martin W. Tysland, Thomas Bailey Hagir, Morten Dalen, Ingvild Qvindesland, Sigrun Anna Ersdal, Hege Kurz, Kathinka D. Brain Behav Original Articles BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke (AIS), rapid treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is crucial for good clinical outcome. Weekly simulation‐based team‐training of the stroke treatment team was implemented, resulting in faster treatment times. The aim of this study was to assess whether this time reduction led to a higher proportion of stroke mimics (SMs) among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS, and whether these SM patients were harmed by intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: All suspected AIS patients treated with IVT between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 were prospectively registered. In 2017, weekly in situ simulation‐based team‐training involving the whole stroke treatment team was introduced. To analyze possible unintended effects of simulation training, the proportion of SMs among patients who received IVT for presumed AIS were identified by clinical and radiological evaluation. Additionally, we identified the extent of symptomatic ICH (sICH) in IVT‐treated SM patients. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2020, 959 patients were treated with IVT for symptoms of AIS. After introduction of simulation training, the proportion of patients treated with IVT who were later diagnosed as SMs increased significantly (15.9% vs. 24.4%, p = .003). There were no ICH complications in the SM patients treated before, whereas two SM patients suffered from asymptomatic ICH after introduction of simulation training (p = 1.0). When subgrouping SMs into prespecified categories, only the group diagnosed with peripheral vertigo increased significantly (2.5% vs. 8.6%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training of the acute stroke treatment team was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients treated with IVT for a suspected AIS who were later diagnosed with peripheral vertigo. The proportion of other SM groups among IVT‐treated patients did not change significantly. No sICH was detected in IVT‐treated SM patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9759129/ /pubmed/36416494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2814 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Høllesli, Liv Jorunn
Ajmi, Soffien Chadli
Kurz, Martin W.
Tysland, Thomas Bailey
Hagir, Morten
Dalen, Ingvild
Qvindesland, Sigrun Anna
Ersdal, Hege
Kurz, Kathinka D.
Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?
title Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?
title_full Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?
title_fullStr Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?
title_full_unstemmed Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?
title_short Simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: Is it safe to speed up?
title_sort simulation‐based team‐training in acute stroke: is it safe to speed up?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9759129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2814
work_keys_str_mv AT hølleslilivjorunn simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT ajmisoffienchadli simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT kurzmartinw simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT tyslandthomasbailey simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT hagirmorten simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT daleningvild simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT qvindeslandsigrunanna simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT ersdalhege simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup
AT kurzkathinkad simulationbasedteamtraininginacutestrokeisitsafetospeedup