Cargando…
Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series
OBJECTIVES: Postpyloric enteral feeding tubes (PPTs) are often placed endoscopically. This carries cost and capacity implications for hospitals with additional strain on endoscopy units during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The Kangaroo Feeding Tube with IRIS Technology (IRIS) uses optical visualization t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9759555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111195 |
_version_ | 1784852258767241216 |
---|---|
author | Cardona, Eva Mehta, Shameer |
author_facet | Cardona, Eva Mehta, Shameer |
author_sort | Cardona, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Postpyloric enteral feeding tubes (PPTs) are often placed endoscopically. This carries cost and capacity implications for hospitals with additional strain on endoscopy units during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The Kangaroo Feeding Tube with IRIS Technology (IRIS) uses optical visualization to guide bedside placement, obviating the need for endoscopy. We describe a case series of bedside postpyloric enteral feeding tube placement using the IRIS tube. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center case series over 12 mo. Conscious and sedated adult participants were included. Exclusion criteria were altered anatomy and need for endoscopy for other indications. IRIS placement was confirmed by contrast radiograph. RESULTS: Twenty attempts were made in 19 participants (13 women). The primary indication was intolerance of gastric feeding. The overall success rate was 75%. In sedated participants, 5 (83%) of 6 tubes were successful in 5 participants. In conscious participants, 10 (71%) of 14 tubes were successful in 14 participants. Placement failure in conscious participants was due to intolerance of the camera tip during nasal passage. The median procedure time was 13.5 min. In all cases, correct position as deemed by the operator was confirmed with contrast radiograph. No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest single series of bedside postpyloric enteral feeding tube placement using the IRIS tube to date. The success rate and safety profile reported here, together with the potential benefits (reduced feeding delays, costs, and need for endoscopy) suggest that further, large-scale studies are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9759555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97595552022-12-19 Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series Cardona, Eva Mehta, Shameer Nutrition Rapid Communication OBJECTIVES: Postpyloric enteral feeding tubes (PPTs) are often placed endoscopically. This carries cost and capacity implications for hospitals with additional strain on endoscopy units during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The Kangaroo Feeding Tube with IRIS Technology (IRIS) uses optical visualization to guide bedside placement, obviating the need for endoscopy. We describe a case series of bedside postpyloric enteral feeding tube placement using the IRIS tube. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center case series over 12 mo. Conscious and sedated adult participants were included. Exclusion criteria were altered anatomy and need for endoscopy for other indications. IRIS placement was confirmed by contrast radiograph. RESULTS: Twenty attempts were made in 19 participants (13 women). The primary indication was intolerance of gastric feeding. The overall success rate was 75%. In sedated participants, 5 (83%) of 6 tubes were successful in 5 participants. In conscious participants, 10 (71%) of 14 tubes were successful in 14 participants. Placement failure in conscious participants was due to intolerance of the camera tip during nasal passage. The median procedure time was 13.5 min. In all cases, correct position as deemed by the operator was confirmed with contrast radiograph. No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest single series of bedside postpyloric enteral feeding tube placement using the IRIS tube to date. The success rate and safety profile reported here, together with the potential benefits (reduced feeding delays, costs, and need for endoscopy) suggest that further, large-scale studies are warranted. Elsevier Inc. 2021-06 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9759555/ /pubmed/33706231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111195 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Rapid Communication Cardona, Eva Mehta, Shameer Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series |
title | Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series |
title_full | Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series |
title_fullStr | Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series |
title_short | Bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using Kangaroo IRIS technology: a single-center case series |
title_sort | bedside postpyloric enteral tube placement using kangaroo iris technology: a single-center case series |
topic | Rapid Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9759555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33706231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cardonaeva bedsidepostpyloricenteraltubeplacementusingkangarooiristechnologyasinglecentercaseseries AT mehtashameer bedsidepostpyloricenteraltubeplacementusingkangarooiristechnologyasinglecentercaseseries |