Cargando…
New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians
Fragility fractures are painful, debilitating, often life-changing and accounted for an estimated 2.4% of pre-pandemic health care spending in the UK. Those who are older, frail and multimorbid have the highest fracture risk and therefore the most to gain from anti-osteoporosis treatments to reduce...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac044 |
_version_ | 1784852374864527360 |
---|---|
author | Gregson, Celia L Compston, Juliet E |
author_facet | Gregson, Celia L Compston, Juliet E |
author_sort | Gregson, Celia L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fragility fractures are painful, debilitating, often life-changing and accounted for an estimated 2.4% of pre-pandemic health care spending in the UK. Those who are older, frail and multimorbid have the highest fracture risk and therefore the most to gain from anti-osteoporosis treatments to reduce this risk. Currently, an unacceptable treatment gap exists between those eligible for and those who receive treatment. This commentary discusses the major changes to the new, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence accredited, UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidance (published March 2022) most relevant to the management of older people’s bone health. Changes include intervention thresholds; using fracture probabilities from FRAX; for patients too frail to undergo DXA; greater emphasis on vertebral fracture detection and the use of intravenous zoledronate as a first-line anti-osteoporosis therapy; the new concept of ‘very high fracture risk’ which should prompt consideration of use of parenteral anti-osteoporosis therapy; new guidance regarding anabolic treatment options; concerns regarding denosumab cessation; and the urgent need to get patients with a fragility fracture onto treatment to reduce re-fracture risk with follow-up to check tolerance and ensure adherence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9760060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97600602022-12-19 New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians Gregson, Celia L Compston, Juliet E Age Ageing Guideline Commentary Fragility fractures are painful, debilitating, often life-changing and accounted for an estimated 2.4% of pre-pandemic health care spending in the UK. Those who are older, frail and multimorbid have the highest fracture risk and therefore the most to gain from anti-osteoporosis treatments to reduce this risk. Currently, an unacceptable treatment gap exists between those eligible for and those who receive treatment. This commentary discusses the major changes to the new, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence accredited, UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidance (published March 2022) most relevant to the management of older people’s bone health. Changes include intervention thresholds; using fracture probabilities from FRAX; for patients too frail to undergo DXA; greater emphasis on vertebral fracture detection and the use of intravenous zoledronate as a first-line anti-osteoporosis therapy; the new concept of ‘very high fracture risk’ which should prompt consideration of use of parenteral anti-osteoporosis therapy; new guidance regarding anabolic treatment options; concerns regarding denosumab cessation; and the urgent need to get patients with a fragility fracture onto treatment to reduce re-fracture risk with follow-up to check tolerance and ensure adherence. Oxford University Press 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9760060/ /pubmed/35403198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac044 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Guideline Commentary Gregson, Celia L Compston, Juliet E New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians |
title | New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians |
title_full | New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians |
title_fullStr | New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians |
title_full_unstemmed | New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians |
title_short | New national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians |
title_sort | new national osteoporosis guidance—implications for geriatricians |
topic | Guideline Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35403198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gregsoncelial newnationalosteoporosisguidanceimplicationsforgeriatricians AT compstonjuliete newnationalosteoporosisguidanceimplicationsforgeriatricians |