Cargando…
Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19
BACKGROUND: Restricted access to hospitals due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly altered practice patterns for elective neurosurgical care. Particularly, telemedicine has become the primary modality of patient visits for nonemergent conditions. This study ai...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.101 |
_version_ | 1784852422533840896 |
---|---|
author | Ryu, Won Hyung A. Kerolus, Mena G. Traynelis, Vincent C. |
author_facet | Ryu, Won Hyung A. Kerolus, Mena G. Traynelis, Vincent C. |
author_sort | Ryu, Won Hyung A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Restricted access to hospitals due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly altered practice patterns for elective neurosurgical care. Particularly, telemedicine has become the primary modality of patient visits for nonemergent conditions. This study aimed to characterize user experiences of neurosurgeons and advanced practice providers focusing on perceived utility and barriers of telemedicine in management of elective neurosurgical patients during COVID-19. METHODS: An online survey was sent to clinicians involved in neurosurgical care using telemedicine with questions focusing on frequency of utilization, duration of patient encounters, benefits of telemedicine, and barriers to current forms of remote patient visits. Survey responses were stratified by clinical position (neurosurgeon vs. advanced practice provider) and subspecialty focus (cranial vs. spinal neurosurgery). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 14 of 17 eligible clinicians. Respondents included 10 neurosurgeons and 4 APPs with 57% specializing in cranial neurosurgery and 43% specializing in spinal neurosurgery. During the COVID-19 period, 78% of respondents used teleconference/video conference visits multiple times in a week, and 86% planned to continue using telemedicine after the pandemic. The most common barrier for telemedicine was the inability to perform a neurological examination, while the most common perceived benefit was increased convenience for patients. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 period, telemedicine was heavily relied on to ensure the continuation of perioperative care for patients with elective neurosurgical pathologies. While clinicians identified numerous barriers for current telemedicine platforms, the use of telemedicine will likely continue, as it has provided unique benefits for patients, clinicians, and hospitals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9760258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97602582022-12-19 Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 Ryu, Won Hyung A. Kerolus, Mena G. Traynelis, Vincent C. World Neurosurg Original Article BACKGROUND: Restricted access to hospitals due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly altered practice patterns for elective neurosurgical care. Particularly, telemedicine has become the primary modality of patient visits for nonemergent conditions. This study aimed to characterize user experiences of neurosurgeons and advanced practice providers focusing on perceived utility and barriers of telemedicine in management of elective neurosurgical patients during COVID-19. METHODS: An online survey was sent to clinicians involved in neurosurgical care using telemedicine with questions focusing on frequency of utilization, duration of patient encounters, benefits of telemedicine, and barriers to current forms of remote patient visits. Survey responses were stratified by clinical position (neurosurgeon vs. advanced practice provider) and subspecialty focus (cranial vs. spinal neurosurgery). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 14 of 17 eligible clinicians. Respondents included 10 neurosurgeons and 4 APPs with 57% specializing in cranial neurosurgery and 43% specializing in spinal neurosurgery. During the COVID-19 period, 78% of respondents used teleconference/video conference visits multiple times in a week, and 86% planned to continue using telemedicine after the pandemic. The most common barrier for telemedicine was the inability to perform a neurological examination, while the most common perceived benefit was increased convenience for patients. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 period, telemedicine was heavily relied on to ensure the continuation of perioperative care for patients with elective neurosurgical pathologies. While clinicians identified numerous barriers for current telemedicine platforms, the use of telemedicine will likely continue, as it has provided unique benefits for patients, clinicians, and hospitals. Elsevier Inc. 2021-02 2020-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9760258/ /pubmed/33203534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.101 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ryu, Won Hyung A. Kerolus, Mena G. Traynelis, Vincent C. Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 |
title | Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 |
title_full | Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 |
title_short | Clinicians’ User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19 |
title_sort | clinicians’ user experience of telemedicine in neurosurgery during covid-19 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryuwonhyunga cliniciansuserexperienceoftelemedicineinneurosurgeryduringcovid19 AT kerolusmenag cliniciansuserexperienceoftelemedicineinneurosurgeryduringcovid19 AT traynelisvincentc cliniciansuserexperienceoftelemedicineinneurosurgeryduringcovid19 |