Cargando…
Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability
Coronary angiography and viability testing are the cornerstones of diagnosing and managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. At present, no single test serves both needs. Coronary wave intensity analysis interrogates both contractility and microvascular physiology of the subtended myocardium and therefore ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36538582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012394 |
_version_ | 1784852483739222016 |
---|---|
author | Ryan, Matthew De Silva, Kalpa Morgan, Holly O’Gallagher, Kevin Demir, Ozan M. Rahman, Haseeb Ellis, Howard Dancy, Luke Sado, Daniel Strange, Julian Melikian, Narbeh Marber, Michael Shah, Ajay M. Chiribiri, Amedeo Perera, Divaka |
author_facet | Ryan, Matthew De Silva, Kalpa Morgan, Holly O’Gallagher, Kevin Demir, Ozan M. Rahman, Haseeb Ellis, Howard Dancy, Luke Sado, Daniel Strange, Julian Melikian, Narbeh Marber, Michael Shah, Ajay M. Chiribiri, Amedeo Perera, Divaka |
author_sort | Ryan, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coronary angiography and viability testing are the cornerstones of diagnosing and managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. At present, no single test serves both needs. Coronary wave intensity analysis interrogates both contractility and microvascular physiology of the subtended myocardium and therefore has the potential to fulfil the goal of completely assessing coronary physiology and myocardial viability in a single procedure. We hypothesized that coronary wave intensity analysis measured during coronary angiography would predict viability with a similar accuracy to late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and extensive coronary disease were enrolled. Coronary wave intensity analysis was assessed during cardiac catheterization at rest, during adenosine-induced hyperemia, and during low-dose dobutamine stress using a dual pressure-Doppler sensing coronary guidewire. Scar burden was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Regional left ventricular function was assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up after optimization of medical-therapy±revascularization, using transthoracic echocardiography. The primary outcome was myocardial viability, determined by the retrospective observation of functional recovery. RESULTS: Forty participants underwent baseline physiology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiography, and 30 had echocardiography at 6 months; 21/42 territories were viable on follow-up echocardiography. Resting backward compression wave energy was significantly greater in viable than in nonviable territories (−5240±3772 versus −1873±1605 W m(−2) s(−1), P<0.001), and had comparable accuracy to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting viability (area under the curve 0.812 versus 0.757, P=0.649); a threshold of −2500 W m(−2) s(−1) had 86% sensitivity and 76% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Backward compression wave energy has accuracy similar to that of late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of viability. Coronary wave intensity analysis has the potential to streamline the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy, in a manner analogous to the effect of fractional flow reserve on the management of stable angina. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9760472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97604722022-12-20 Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability Ryan, Matthew De Silva, Kalpa Morgan, Holly O’Gallagher, Kevin Demir, Ozan M. Rahman, Haseeb Ellis, Howard Dancy, Luke Sado, Daniel Strange, Julian Melikian, Narbeh Marber, Michael Shah, Ajay M. Chiribiri, Amedeo Perera, Divaka Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles Coronary angiography and viability testing are the cornerstones of diagnosing and managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. At present, no single test serves both needs. Coronary wave intensity analysis interrogates both contractility and microvascular physiology of the subtended myocardium and therefore has the potential to fulfil the goal of completely assessing coronary physiology and myocardial viability in a single procedure. We hypothesized that coronary wave intensity analysis measured during coronary angiography would predict viability with a similar accuracy to late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and extensive coronary disease were enrolled. Coronary wave intensity analysis was assessed during cardiac catheterization at rest, during adenosine-induced hyperemia, and during low-dose dobutamine stress using a dual pressure-Doppler sensing coronary guidewire. Scar burden was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Regional left ventricular function was assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up after optimization of medical-therapy±revascularization, using transthoracic echocardiography. The primary outcome was myocardial viability, determined by the retrospective observation of functional recovery. RESULTS: Forty participants underwent baseline physiology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiography, and 30 had echocardiography at 6 months; 21/42 territories were viable on follow-up echocardiography. Resting backward compression wave energy was significantly greater in viable than in nonviable territories (−5240±3772 versus −1873±1605 W m(−2) s(−1), P<0.001), and had comparable accuracy to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting viability (area under the curve 0.812 versus 0.757, P=0.649); a threshold of −2500 W m(−2) s(−1) had 86% sensitivity and 76% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Backward compression wave energy has accuracy similar to that of late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of viability. Coronary wave intensity analysis has the potential to streamline the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy, in a manner analogous to the effect of fractional flow reserve on the management of stable angina. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9760472/ /pubmed/36538582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012394 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ryan, Matthew De Silva, Kalpa Morgan, Holly O’Gallagher, Kevin Demir, Ozan M. Rahman, Haseeb Ellis, Howard Dancy, Luke Sado, Daniel Strange, Julian Melikian, Narbeh Marber, Michael Shah, Ajay M. Chiribiri, Amedeo Perera, Divaka Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability |
title | Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability |
title_full | Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability |
title_fullStr | Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability |
title_full_unstemmed | Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability |
title_short | Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability |
title_sort | coronary wave intensity analysis as an invasive and vessel-specific index of myocardial viability |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36538582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012394 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryanmatthew coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT desilvakalpa coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT morganholly coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT ogallagherkevin coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT demirozanm coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT rahmanhaseeb coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT ellishoward coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT dancyluke coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT sadodaniel coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT strangejulian coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT melikiannarbeh coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT marbermichael coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT shahajaym coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT chiribiriamedeo coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability AT pereradivaka coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability |