Cargando…

Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability

Coronary angiography and viability testing are the cornerstones of diagnosing and managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. At present, no single test serves both needs. Coronary wave intensity analysis interrogates both contractility and microvascular physiology of the subtended myocardium and therefore ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan, Matthew, De Silva, Kalpa, Morgan, Holly, O’Gallagher, Kevin, Demir, Ozan M., Rahman, Haseeb, Ellis, Howard, Dancy, Luke, Sado, Daniel, Strange, Julian, Melikian, Narbeh, Marber, Michael, Shah, Ajay M., Chiribiri, Amedeo, Perera, Divaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36538582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012394
_version_ 1784852483739222016
author Ryan, Matthew
De Silva, Kalpa
Morgan, Holly
O’Gallagher, Kevin
Demir, Ozan M.
Rahman, Haseeb
Ellis, Howard
Dancy, Luke
Sado, Daniel
Strange, Julian
Melikian, Narbeh
Marber, Michael
Shah, Ajay M.
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Perera, Divaka
author_facet Ryan, Matthew
De Silva, Kalpa
Morgan, Holly
O’Gallagher, Kevin
Demir, Ozan M.
Rahman, Haseeb
Ellis, Howard
Dancy, Luke
Sado, Daniel
Strange, Julian
Melikian, Narbeh
Marber, Michael
Shah, Ajay M.
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Perera, Divaka
author_sort Ryan, Matthew
collection PubMed
description Coronary angiography and viability testing are the cornerstones of diagnosing and managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. At present, no single test serves both needs. Coronary wave intensity analysis interrogates both contractility and microvascular physiology of the subtended myocardium and therefore has the potential to fulfil the goal of completely assessing coronary physiology and myocardial viability in a single procedure. We hypothesized that coronary wave intensity analysis measured during coronary angiography would predict viability with a similar accuracy to late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and extensive coronary disease were enrolled. Coronary wave intensity analysis was assessed during cardiac catheterization at rest, during adenosine-induced hyperemia, and during low-dose dobutamine stress using a dual pressure-Doppler sensing coronary guidewire. Scar burden was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Regional left ventricular function was assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up after optimization of medical-therapy±revascularization, using transthoracic echocardiography. The primary outcome was myocardial viability, determined by the retrospective observation of functional recovery. RESULTS: Forty participants underwent baseline physiology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiography, and 30 had echocardiography at 6 months; 21/42 territories were viable on follow-up echocardiography. Resting backward compression wave energy was significantly greater in viable than in nonviable territories (−5240±3772 versus −1873±1605 W m(−2) s(−1), P<0.001), and had comparable accuracy to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting viability (area under the curve 0.812 versus 0.757, P=0.649); a threshold of −2500 W m(−2) s(−1) had 86% sensitivity and 76% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Backward compression wave energy has accuracy similar to that of late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of viability. Coronary wave intensity analysis has the potential to streamline the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy, in a manner analogous to the effect of fractional flow reserve on the management of stable angina.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9760472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97604722022-12-20 Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability Ryan, Matthew De Silva, Kalpa Morgan, Holly O’Gallagher, Kevin Demir, Ozan M. Rahman, Haseeb Ellis, Howard Dancy, Luke Sado, Daniel Strange, Julian Melikian, Narbeh Marber, Michael Shah, Ajay M. Chiribiri, Amedeo Perera, Divaka Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles Coronary angiography and viability testing are the cornerstones of diagnosing and managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. At present, no single test serves both needs. Coronary wave intensity analysis interrogates both contractility and microvascular physiology of the subtended myocardium and therefore has the potential to fulfil the goal of completely assessing coronary physiology and myocardial viability in a single procedure. We hypothesized that coronary wave intensity analysis measured during coronary angiography would predict viability with a similar accuracy to late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and extensive coronary disease were enrolled. Coronary wave intensity analysis was assessed during cardiac catheterization at rest, during adenosine-induced hyperemia, and during low-dose dobutamine stress using a dual pressure-Doppler sensing coronary guidewire. Scar burden was assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Regional left ventricular function was assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up after optimization of medical-therapy±revascularization, using transthoracic echocardiography. The primary outcome was myocardial viability, determined by the retrospective observation of functional recovery. RESULTS: Forty participants underwent baseline physiology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiography, and 30 had echocardiography at 6 months; 21/42 territories were viable on follow-up echocardiography. Resting backward compression wave energy was significantly greater in viable than in nonviable territories (−5240±3772 versus −1873±1605 W m(−2) s(−1), P<0.001), and had comparable accuracy to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for predicting viability (area under the curve 0.812 versus 0.757, P=0.649); a threshold of −2500 W m(−2) s(−1) had 86% sensitivity and 76% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Backward compression wave energy has accuracy similar to that of late-gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of viability. Coronary wave intensity analysis has the potential to streamline the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy, in a manner analogous to the effect of fractional flow reserve on the management of stable angina. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9760472/ /pubmed/36538582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012394 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ryan, Matthew
De Silva, Kalpa
Morgan, Holly
O’Gallagher, Kevin
Demir, Ozan M.
Rahman, Haseeb
Ellis, Howard
Dancy, Luke
Sado, Daniel
Strange, Julian
Melikian, Narbeh
Marber, Michael
Shah, Ajay M.
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Perera, Divaka
Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability
title Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability
title_full Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability
title_fullStr Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability
title_full_unstemmed Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability
title_short Coronary Wave Intensity Analysis as an Invasive and Vessel-Specific Index of Myocardial Viability
title_sort coronary wave intensity analysis as an invasive and vessel-specific index of myocardial viability
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36538582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012394
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanmatthew coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT desilvakalpa coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT morganholly coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT ogallagherkevin coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT demirozanm coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT rahmanhaseeb coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT ellishoward coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT dancyluke coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT sadodaniel coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT strangejulian coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT melikiannarbeh coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT marbermichael coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT shahajaym coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT chiribiriamedeo coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability
AT pereradivaka coronarywaveintensityanalysisasaninvasiveandvesselspecificindexofmyocardialviability