Cargando…

Physiologic Effects of the Awake Prone Position Combined With High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Gas Exchange and Work of Breathing in Patients With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Randomized Crossover Trial

To determine the effect of the awake prone position (APP) on gas exchange and the work of breathing in spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19–associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) supported by high-flow nasal oxygen. DESIGN: Prospective randomized physiologic crossover multic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehingue, Samuel, Allardet-Servent, Jérôme, Ferdani, Anne, Hraeich, Sami, Forel, Jean-Marie, Arnal, Jean-Michel, Prud’homme, Eloi, Penaranda, Guillaume, Bourenne, Jeremy, Monnet, Olivier, Gainnier, Marc, Cantais, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000805
Descripción
Sumario:To determine the effect of the awake prone position (APP) on gas exchange and the work of breathing in spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19–associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) supported by high-flow nasal oxygen. DESIGN: Prospective randomized physiologic crossover multicenter trial. SETTINGS: Four ICUs in Marseille, France. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and Pao(2)/Fio(2) less than or equal to 300 mm Hg while treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Periods of APP and semirecumbent position (SRP) were randomly applied for 2 hours and separated by a 2-hour washout period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial blood gases, end-tidal CO(2). and esophageal pressure were recorded prior to and at the end of each period. Inspiratory muscle effort was assessed by measuring the esophageal pressure swing (∆P(ES)) and the simplified esophageal pressure–time product (sPTP(ES)). The other endpoints included physiologic dead space to tidal volume ratio (V(D)/V(T)) and the transpulmonary pressure swing. The APP increased the Pao(2)/Fio(2) from 84 Torr (61–137 Torr) to 208 Torr (114–226 Torr) (p = 0.0007) and decreased both the V(D)/V(T) and the respiratory rate from 0.54 (0.47–0.57) to 0.49 (0.45–0.53) (p = 0.012) and from 26 breaths/min (21–30 breaths/min) to 21 breaths/min (19–22 breaths/min), respectively (p = 0.002). These variables remained unchanged during the SRP. The ∆P(ES) and sPTP(ES) per breath were unaffected by the position. However, the APP reduced the sPTP(ES) per minute from 225 cm H(2)O.s.m(–1) (176–332 cm H(2)O.s.m(–1)) to 174 cm H(2)O.s.m(–1) (161–254 cm H(2)O.s.m(–1)) (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: In spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19–associated AHRF supported by high-flow nasal oxygen, the APP improves oxygenation and reduces the physiologic dead space, respiratory rate, and work of breathing per minute.