Cargando…

Meta-analysis of the effect of PGM on survival prognosis of tumor patients

OBJECTIVE: A systematic evaluation of the impact of phosphoglucose translocase PGM on the survival prognosis of tumor patients was conducted to understand its impact on tumors so as to improve the quality of survival and to find effective therapeutic targets for tumor patients. METHODS: The followin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Zhewen, Bai, Jian, Shen, Shuangting, Zhu, Chunmei, Zhou, Yunfeng, Zhang, Xue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1060372
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: A systematic evaluation of the impact of phosphoglucose translocase PGM on the survival prognosis of tumor patients was conducted to understand its impact on tumors so as to improve the quality of survival and to find effective therapeutic targets for tumor patients. METHODS: The following were searched in the databases China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Wipu, PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library: “PGM1”, “PGM2”, “PGM3”, “PGM4”, and “PGM5” as Chinese keywords and “PGM1”, “PGM2”, “PGM3”, “PGM4”, “PGM5”, “PGM1 cancer”, “PGM2 cancer”, “PGM3 cancer”, “PGM4 cancer”, “PGM5 cancer”, and “phosphoglucomutase”. Relevant studies published from the database establishment to April 2022 were collected. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted and evaluated for quality with reference to the Cochrane 5.1.0 systematic evaluation method, and quality assessment was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: The final results of nine articles and 10 studies with a total of 3,806 patients were included, including 272 patients in the PGM1 group, 541 patients in the PGM2 group, 1,775 patients in the PGM3 group, and 1,585 patients in the PGM5 group. Results of the meta-analysis: after determining the results of the nine articles, it was found that the difference was statistically significant with a p-value <0.05 (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.69–1.09, p = 0.000). To find the sources of heterogeneity, the remaining eight papers were tested after removing the highly sensitive literature, and the results showed I(2) = 26.5%, p < 0.001, a statistically significant difference. The HR for high expression of PGM1 and PGM2 and PGM5 was <1, while the HR for high expression of PGM3 was >1. CONCLUSION: Although PGM1, PGM2, PGM3, and PGM5 are enzymes of the same family, their effects on tumors are different. High expression of PGM1, PGM2, and PGM5 can effectively prolong the overall survival of patients. In contrast, high expression of PGM3 reduced the overall survival of patients. This study of PGM family enzymes can assist in subsequent tumor diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment.