Cargando…

Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease

OBJECTIVES: Although the cause of Meniere’s disease (MD) is not fully understood, endolymphatic hydrops is widely believed to be responsible for MD. Previous studies have used Air-Conducted Sound (ACS)-induced Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) to evaluate otolithic function in patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Ying, Zhang, Yuzhong, Chen, Zichen, Ma, Weijun, Chen, Yanfei, Zhang, Qing, Xu, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35469706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.010
_version_ 1784852606840995840
author Cheng, Ying
Zhang, Yuzhong
Chen, Zichen
Ma, Weijun
Chen, Yanfei
Zhang, Qing
Xu, Min
author_facet Cheng, Ying
Zhang, Yuzhong
Chen, Zichen
Ma, Weijun
Chen, Yanfei
Zhang, Qing
Xu, Min
author_sort Cheng, Ying
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Although the cause of Meniere’s disease (MD) is not fully understood, endolymphatic hydrops is widely believed to be responsible for MD. Previous studies have used Air-Conducted Sound (ACS)-induced Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) to evaluate otolithic function in patients with MD. However, the use of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation-VEMPs (GVS-VEMPs) with other vestibular tests in MD has been rare. This study aimed to explore the application of galvanic VEMPs in assessing MD. METHODS: Normal individuals and patients with unilateral definite MD were included in this retrospective study. All participants underwent pure tone audiometry. Ocular and cervical VEMPs induced by GVS, and ACS were recorded. The characteristic parameters of VEMPs (n1 latency, p1 latency, amplitude, and AR) were analyzed. RESULTS: The provocation rates of GVS-VEMPs did not differ between MD patients and control individuals. Compared with ACS, GVS could evoke potentials with longer latencies. MD patients presented GVS-VEMPs with lower amplitudes and ACS-cVEMP with shorter latencies and had a higher response rate in GVS-oVEMP. However, no differences or correlations were found in the characteristic parameters of GVS-VEMPs among the different stages of MD. CONCLUSIONS: GVS is as effective as ACS for inducing VEMP, and GVS-VEMP recording can detect retrolabyrinthine degeneration in MD. Further research is needed to assess the utility of GVS-VEMP in the evaluation of MD severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9760987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97609872022-12-20 Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease Cheng, Ying Zhang, Yuzhong Chen, Zichen Ma, Weijun Chen, Yanfei Zhang, Qing Xu, Min Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Although the cause of Meniere’s disease (MD) is not fully understood, endolymphatic hydrops is widely believed to be responsible for MD. Previous studies have used Air-Conducted Sound (ACS)-induced Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) to evaluate otolithic function in patients with MD. However, the use of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation-VEMPs (GVS-VEMPs) with other vestibular tests in MD has been rare. This study aimed to explore the application of galvanic VEMPs in assessing MD. METHODS: Normal individuals and patients with unilateral definite MD were included in this retrospective study. All participants underwent pure tone audiometry. Ocular and cervical VEMPs induced by GVS, and ACS were recorded. The characteristic parameters of VEMPs (n1 latency, p1 latency, amplitude, and AR) were analyzed. RESULTS: The provocation rates of GVS-VEMPs did not differ between MD patients and control individuals. Compared with ACS, GVS could evoke potentials with longer latencies. MD patients presented GVS-VEMPs with lower amplitudes and ACS-cVEMP with shorter latencies and had a higher response rate in GVS-oVEMP. However, no differences or correlations were found in the characteristic parameters of GVS-VEMPs among the different stages of MD. CONCLUSIONS: GVS is as effective as ACS for inducing VEMP, and GVS-VEMP recording can detect retrolabyrinthine degeneration in MD. Further research is needed to assess the utility of GVS-VEMP in the evaluation of MD severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. Elsevier 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9760987/ /pubmed/35469706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.010 Text en © 2022 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Cheng, Ying
Zhang, Yuzhong
Chen, Zichen
Ma, Weijun
Chen, Yanfei
Zhang, Qing
Xu, Min
Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease
title Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease
title_full Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease
title_fullStr Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease
title_short Effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of Meniere’s disease
title_sort effectiveness of galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential for evaluation of meniere’s disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35469706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.010
work_keys_str_mv AT chengying effectivenessofgalvanicvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialforevaluationofmenieresdisease
AT zhangyuzhong effectivenessofgalvanicvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialforevaluationofmenieresdisease
AT chenzichen effectivenessofgalvanicvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialforevaluationofmenieresdisease
AT maweijun effectivenessofgalvanicvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialforevaluationofmenieresdisease
AT chenyanfei effectivenessofgalvanicvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialforevaluationofmenieresdisease
AT zhangqing effectivenessofgalvanicvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialforevaluationofmenieresdisease
AT xumin effectivenessofgalvanicvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialforevaluationofmenieresdisease