Cargando…

The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of noise on electrophysiological measurements (P1-N1-P2 complex) of cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing individuals of different ages. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for the study were young individuals, adults and elderly, aged 18–75 years, with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira, Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral, Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges, Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque, Menezes, Denise Costa, Advíncula, Karina Paes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.006
_version_ 1784852607095799808
author Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira
Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral
Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges
Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque
Menezes, Denise Costa
Advíncula, Karina Paes
author_facet Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira
Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral
Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges
Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque
Menezes, Denise Costa
Advíncula, Karina Paes
author_sort Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of noise on electrophysiological measurements (P1-N1-P2 complex) of cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing individuals of different ages. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for the study were young individuals, adults and elderly, aged 18–75 years, with auditory thresholds up to 25 dB. Participants were separated according to their age group: G1 (18–25 years old), G2 (31–59 years old) and G3 (60–75 years old). Cortical auditory evoked potentials were elicited with synthetic speech stimulus /da/ presented in two conditions: without masking and with masking (Delta-t 64 ms). The results were expressed and analyzed using statistical measures. RESULTS: High latencies and reduced amplitudes were observed in the Delta-t 64 ms condition, in all age groups. There were significant differences between the groups, both in P1 latencies for the two conditions and in N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition. P1 latencies in the condition without masking were lower in G1 and P1 and N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition were higher in G3. The described results show the influence of noise on cortical responses in all age groups, with G3 being the most affected by the masking presentation. CONCLUSION: The latency and amplitude measurements vary according to the stimulus presentation condition and age group. The forward masking phenomenon occurred with greater precision in G3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: (2c).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9760988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97609882022-12-20 The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque Menezes, Denise Costa Advíncula, Karina Paes Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of noise on electrophysiological measurements (P1-N1-P2 complex) of cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing individuals of different ages. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for the study were young individuals, adults and elderly, aged 18–75 years, with auditory thresholds up to 25 dB. Participants were separated according to their age group: G1 (18–25 years old), G2 (31–59 years old) and G3 (60–75 years old). Cortical auditory evoked potentials were elicited with synthetic speech stimulus /da/ presented in two conditions: without masking and with masking (Delta-t 64 ms). The results were expressed and analyzed using statistical measures. RESULTS: High latencies and reduced amplitudes were observed in the Delta-t 64 ms condition, in all age groups. There were significant differences between the groups, both in P1 latencies for the two conditions and in N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition. P1 latencies in the condition without masking were lower in G1 and P1 and N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition were higher in G3. The described results show the influence of noise on cortical responses in all age groups, with G3 being the most affected by the masking presentation. CONCLUSION: The latency and amplitude measurements vary according to the stimulus presentation condition and age group. The forward masking phenomenon occurred with greater precision in G3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: (2c). Elsevier 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9760988/ /pubmed/35177355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.006 Text en © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira
Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral
Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges
Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque
Menezes, Denise Costa
Advíncula, Karina Paes
The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
title The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
title_full The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
title_fullStr The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
title_full_unstemmed The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
title_short The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
title_sort effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.006
work_keys_str_mv AT duartedaniellesamarabandeira theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT grizsilvanamariasobral theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT rochamonykaferreiraborges theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT brittodianababinilapadealbuquerque theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT menezesdenisecosta theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT advinculakarinapaes theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT duartedaniellesamarabandeira effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT grizsilvanamariasobral effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT rochamonykaferreiraborges effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT brittodianababinilapadealbuquerque effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT menezesdenisecosta effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials
AT advinculakarinapaes effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials