Cargando…
The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of noise on electrophysiological measurements (P1-N1-P2 complex) of cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing individuals of different ages. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for the study were young individuals, adults and elderly, aged 18–75 years, with a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.006 |
_version_ | 1784852607095799808 |
---|---|
author | Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque Menezes, Denise Costa Advíncula, Karina Paes |
author_facet | Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque Menezes, Denise Costa Advíncula, Karina Paes |
author_sort | Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of noise on electrophysiological measurements (P1-N1-P2 complex) of cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing individuals of different ages. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for the study were young individuals, adults and elderly, aged 18–75 years, with auditory thresholds up to 25 dB. Participants were separated according to their age group: G1 (18–25 years old), G2 (31–59 years old) and G3 (60–75 years old). Cortical auditory evoked potentials were elicited with synthetic speech stimulus /da/ presented in two conditions: without masking and with masking (Delta-t 64 ms). The results were expressed and analyzed using statistical measures. RESULTS: High latencies and reduced amplitudes were observed in the Delta-t 64 ms condition, in all age groups. There were significant differences between the groups, both in P1 latencies for the two conditions and in N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition. P1 latencies in the condition without masking were lower in G1 and P1 and N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition were higher in G3. The described results show the influence of noise on cortical responses in all age groups, with G3 being the most affected by the masking presentation. CONCLUSION: The latency and amplitude measurements vary according to the stimulus presentation condition and age group. The forward masking phenomenon occurred with greater precision in G3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: (2c). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9760988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97609882022-12-20 The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque Menezes, Denise Costa Advíncula, Karina Paes Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of noise on electrophysiological measurements (P1-N1-P2 complex) of cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing individuals of different ages. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for the study were young individuals, adults and elderly, aged 18–75 years, with auditory thresholds up to 25 dB. Participants were separated according to their age group: G1 (18–25 years old), G2 (31–59 years old) and G3 (60–75 years old). Cortical auditory evoked potentials were elicited with synthetic speech stimulus /da/ presented in two conditions: without masking and with masking (Delta-t 64 ms). The results were expressed and analyzed using statistical measures. RESULTS: High latencies and reduced amplitudes were observed in the Delta-t 64 ms condition, in all age groups. There were significant differences between the groups, both in P1 latencies for the two conditions and in N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition. P1 latencies in the condition without masking were lower in G1 and P1 and N1 latencies in the Delta-t 64 ms condition were higher in G3. The described results show the influence of noise on cortical responses in all age groups, with G3 being the most affected by the masking presentation. CONCLUSION: The latency and amplitude measurements vary according to the stimulus presentation condition and age group. The forward masking phenomenon occurred with greater precision in G3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: (2c). Elsevier 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9760988/ /pubmed/35177355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.006 Text en © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Duarte, Danielle Samara Bandeira Griz, Silvana Maria Sobral Rocha, Mônyka Ferreira Borges Britto, Diana Babini Lapa de Albuquerque Menezes, Denise Costa Advíncula, Karina Paes The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials |
title | The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials |
title_full | The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials |
title_fullStr | The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials |
title_short | The effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials |
title_sort | effect of noise on the amplitude and morphology of cortical auditory evoked potentials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duartedaniellesamarabandeira theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT grizsilvanamariasobral theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT rochamonykaferreiraborges theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT brittodianababinilapadealbuquerque theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT menezesdenisecosta theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT advinculakarinapaes theeffectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT duartedaniellesamarabandeira effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT grizsilvanamariasobral effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT rochamonykaferreiraborges effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT brittodianababinilapadealbuquerque effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT menezesdenisecosta effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials AT advinculakarinapaes effectofnoiseontheamplitudeandmorphologyofcorticalauditoryevokedpotentials |