Cargando…

The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening

OBJECTIVES: Decreased Sound Tolerance (DST) is a negative reaction to a sound that does not cause any reaction in an individual with normal hearing. DST’s subclasses include hyperacusis, phonophobia, and misophonia, which are distinct and have therapy variations. There is no diagnostic method or sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allusoglu, Serpil, Aksoy, Songul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.009
_version_ 1784852609118502912
author Allusoglu, Serpil
Aksoy, Songul
author_facet Allusoglu, Serpil
Aksoy, Songul
author_sort Allusoglu, Serpil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Decreased Sound Tolerance (DST) is a negative reaction to a sound that does not cause any reaction in an individual with normal hearing. DST’s subclasses include hyperacusis, phonophobia, and misophonia, which are distinct and have therapy variations. There is no diagnostic method or scale that distinguishes them in the literature. This study’s purpose was to develop a screening scale that distinguishes these three DSTs. METHODS: The study comprised 257 willing participants with normal hearing. Cronbach alpha coefficient, item-total correlation, and item differentiation of the Decreased Sound Tolerance Scale-Screening (DSTS-S) were evaluated. Structural validity of DSTS-S was performed by Varimax rotation with Kaiser normalization using Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to assess its structural compatibility. The scale’s total scores from each section were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test in symptom (+) and symptom (–) participants. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha value for hyperacusis, phonophobia, and misophonia sections of DSTS-S was calculated as 0.881, 0.775, and 0.938, respectively. The difference between the independent samplet-test and the variables was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference between the median values of the total groups’ scores with and without hyperacusis, phonophobia, and misophonia (HTS, PTS, and MTS, respectively) (p < 0.05). Evaluation by ROC analysis showed that hyperacusis was useful in predicting the presence of hyperacusis, phonophobia was useful in predicting the presence of phonophobia, and misophonia was useful in predicting the presence of misophonia (p < 0.001). Hyperacusis and misophonia sections showed high reliability, and phonophobia section showed a moderately reliable level. The Kappa test showed that the compatibility between test–retest for the total scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study’s results indicated that DSTS-S is a valid and reliable scale for identifying subtypes/problems/classes of decreased sound tolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9760996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97609962022-12-20 The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening Allusoglu, Serpil Aksoy, Songul Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Decreased Sound Tolerance (DST) is a negative reaction to a sound that does not cause any reaction in an individual with normal hearing. DST’s subclasses include hyperacusis, phonophobia, and misophonia, which are distinct and have therapy variations. There is no diagnostic method or scale that distinguishes them in the literature. This study’s purpose was to develop a screening scale that distinguishes these three DSTs. METHODS: The study comprised 257 willing participants with normal hearing. Cronbach alpha coefficient, item-total correlation, and item differentiation of the Decreased Sound Tolerance Scale-Screening (DSTS-S) were evaluated. Structural validity of DSTS-S was performed by Varimax rotation with Kaiser normalization using Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to assess its structural compatibility. The scale’s total scores from each section were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test in symptom (+) and symptom (–) participants. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha value for hyperacusis, phonophobia, and misophonia sections of DSTS-S was calculated as 0.881, 0.775, and 0.938, respectively. The difference between the independent samplet-test and the variables was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference between the median values of the total groups’ scores with and without hyperacusis, phonophobia, and misophonia (HTS, PTS, and MTS, respectively) (p < 0.05). Evaluation by ROC analysis showed that hyperacusis was useful in predicting the presence of hyperacusis, phonophobia was useful in predicting the presence of phonophobia, and misophonia was useful in predicting the presence of misophonia (p < 0.001). Hyperacusis and misophonia sections showed high reliability, and phonophobia section showed a moderately reliable level. The Kappa test showed that the compatibility between test–retest for the total scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study’s results indicated that DSTS-S is a valid and reliable scale for identifying subtypes/problems/classes of decreased sound tolerance. Elsevier 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9760996/ /pubmed/35177354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.009 Text en © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Allusoglu, Serpil
Aksoy, Songul
The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening
title The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening
title_full The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening
title_fullStr The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening
title_full_unstemmed The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening
title_short The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening
title_sort reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9760996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.009
work_keys_str_mv AT allusogluserpil thereliabilityandvalidityofdecreasedsoundtolerancescalescreening
AT aksoysongul thereliabilityandvalidityofdecreasedsoundtolerancescalescreening
AT allusogluserpil reliabilityandvalidityofdecreasedsoundtolerancescalescreening
AT aksoysongul reliabilityandvalidityofdecreasedsoundtolerancescalescreening