Cargando…
Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs in the prognosis and therapy response of patients with bladder cancer
BACKGROUND: Cuproptosis is the recently defined regulatory cell death (RCD) that plays essential roles in tumorigenesis and progression. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate the gene expression through various means. However, the clinical value of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs in bladder cancer (BLC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544685 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5294 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Cuproptosis is the recently defined regulatory cell death (RCD) that plays essential roles in tumorigenesis and progression. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate the gene expression through various means. However, the clinical value of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs in bladder cancer (BLCA) remains poorly described. METHODS: We downloaded the transcriptome sequencing data and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Univariate, multivariate, and lasso Cox regression analyses were performed to construct the prognostic risk signature, the predictive accuracy of which was validated in the subsequent independence and stratification analyses. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were used to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the signature to explore therapeutic vulnerabilities and potential targets in BLCA. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) were used to estimate the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We further explored the potential new drug-target candidates based on the half maximal inhibitory concentration for this patient population. RESULTS: Fifteen cuproptosis-related lncRNAs significantly associated with survival were identified to construct the risk signature based on the normalized expression level and regression coefficient of each gene. The patients with BLCA and high-risk scores defined by the signature were associated with worse survival outcomes. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the 2 risk groups had different biological activity. Furthermore, the patients in the low-risk group exhibited a higher TMB index and a lower TIDE score. The sensitivity of multiple antitumor drugs was negatively related to risk score, including AR-42, AS605240, FK866, TAK-715, and tubastatin A, while the sensitivity of some antitumor drugs, such as AMG-706, BX-795, and RO-3306, were positively correlated with risk score. CONCLUSIONS: Our study established and verified a novel clinical risk signature with cuproptosis-related lncRNAs that may predict therapy response and prognosis with robust and stable accuracy in patients with BLCA and enhance the personalized management of this patient population. |
---|