Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS: Data from 38 hea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544652 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5078 |
_version_ | 1784852647037108224 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Qingting Hu, Jiyi Hu, Weixu Gao, Jing Yang, Jing Qiu, Xianxin Lu, Jiade Jay Kong, Lin |
author_facet | Huang, Qingting Hu, Jiyi Hu, Weixu Gao, Jing Yang, Jing Qiu, Xianxin Lu, Jiade Jay Kong, Lin |
author_sort | Huang, Qingting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS: Data from 38 head and neck cancer patients who received adjuvant PBRT after complete surgical resection at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) between October 2015 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 18 patients received adjuvant proton beam therapy (54–60 GyE/27–30 fractions) and 20 received adjuvant carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) (54–60 GyE/18–20 fractions). Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (version 4.03). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 21 (range, 3–45) months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.3%, 87.4%, 94.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The rates after proton beam therapy vs. CIRT were 94.1% vs. 91.7% (P=0.96), 88.1% vs. 86.2% (P=0.96), 94.4% vs. 93.3% (P=0.97), and 88.1% vs. 92.9% (P=0.57), respectively. Furthermore, 16 of the 18 (88.9%) patients developed acute grade I/II dermatitis (13 grade I; 3 grade II) after proton beam therapy, and only 7 of the 20 (35%) patients developed acute grade I dermatitis after CIRT (P=0.001). The incidence of acute grade I/II mucositis and xerostomia in proton and carbon ion cases were 45% vs. 55% (P=0.75) and 56% vs. 50% (P=0.87) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant proton beam therapy and CIRT after radical surgical resection for head and neck cancers provided satisfactory therapeutic effectiveness, but no significant difference was observed between the two radiotherapy technologies. However, adjuvant CIRT was associated with a more favorable acute toxicity profile as compared to proton beam therapy with significantly lower frequency and severity of acute dermatitis observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9761156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97611562022-12-20 Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers Huang, Qingting Hu, Jiyi Hu, Weixu Gao, Jing Yang, Jing Qiu, Xianxin Lu, Jiade Jay Kong, Lin Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS: Data from 38 head and neck cancer patients who received adjuvant PBRT after complete surgical resection at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) between October 2015 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 18 patients received adjuvant proton beam therapy (54–60 GyE/27–30 fractions) and 20 received adjuvant carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) (54–60 GyE/18–20 fractions). Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (version 4.03). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 21 (range, 3–45) months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.3%, 87.4%, 94.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The rates after proton beam therapy vs. CIRT were 94.1% vs. 91.7% (P=0.96), 88.1% vs. 86.2% (P=0.96), 94.4% vs. 93.3% (P=0.97), and 88.1% vs. 92.9% (P=0.57), respectively. Furthermore, 16 of the 18 (88.9%) patients developed acute grade I/II dermatitis (13 grade I; 3 grade II) after proton beam therapy, and only 7 of the 20 (35%) patients developed acute grade I dermatitis after CIRT (P=0.001). The incidence of acute grade I/II mucositis and xerostomia in proton and carbon ion cases were 45% vs. 55% (P=0.75) and 56% vs. 50% (P=0.87) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant proton beam therapy and CIRT after radical surgical resection for head and neck cancers provided satisfactory therapeutic effectiveness, but no significant difference was observed between the two radiotherapy technologies. However, adjuvant CIRT was associated with a more favorable acute toxicity profile as compared to proton beam therapy with significantly lower frequency and severity of acute dermatitis observed. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9761156/ /pubmed/36544652 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5078 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Huang, Qingting Hu, Jiyi Hu, Weixu Gao, Jing Yang, Jing Qiu, Xianxin Lu, Jiade Jay Kong, Lin Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers |
title | Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544652 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangqingting comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers AT hujiyi comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers AT huweixu comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers AT gaojing comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers AT yangjing comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers AT qiuxianxin comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers AT lujiadejay comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers AT konglin comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers |