Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS: Data from 38 hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Qingting, Hu, Jiyi, Hu, Weixu, Gao, Jing, Yang, Jing, Qiu, Xianxin, Lu, Jiade Jay, Kong, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544652
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5078
_version_ 1784852647037108224
author Huang, Qingting
Hu, Jiyi
Hu, Weixu
Gao, Jing
Yang, Jing
Qiu, Xianxin
Lu, Jiade Jay
Kong, Lin
author_facet Huang, Qingting
Hu, Jiyi
Hu, Weixu
Gao, Jing
Yang, Jing
Qiu, Xianxin
Lu, Jiade Jay
Kong, Lin
author_sort Huang, Qingting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS: Data from 38 head and neck cancer patients who received adjuvant PBRT after complete surgical resection at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) between October 2015 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 18 patients received adjuvant proton beam therapy (54–60 GyE/27–30 fractions) and 20 received adjuvant carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) (54–60 GyE/18–20 fractions). Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (version 4.03). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 21 (range, 3–45) months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.3%, 87.4%, 94.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The rates after proton beam therapy vs. CIRT were 94.1% vs. 91.7% (P=0.96), 88.1% vs. 86.2% (P=0.96), 94.4% vs. 93.3% (P=0.97), and 88.1% vs. 92.9% (P=0.57), respectively. Furthermore, 16 of the 18 (88.9%) patients developed acute grade I/II dermatitis (13 grade I; 3 grade II) after proton beam therapy, and only 7 of the 20 (35%) patients developed acute grade I dermatitis after CIRT (P=0.001). The incidence of acute grade I/II mucositis and xerostomia in proton and carbon ion cases were 45% vs. 55% (P=0.75) and 56% vs. 50% (P=0.87) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant proton beam therapy and CIRT after radical surgical resection for head and neck cancers provided satisfactory therapeutic effectiveness, but no significant difference was observed between the two radiotherapy technologies. However, adjuvant CIRT was associated with a more favorable acute toxicity profile as compared to proton beam therapy with significantly lower frequency and severity of acute dermatitis observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9761156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97611562022-12-20 Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers Huang, Qingting Hu, Jiyi Hu, Weixu Gao, Jing Yang, Jing Qiu, Xianxin Lu, Jiade Jay Kong, Lin Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. METHODS: Data from 38 head and neck cancer patients who received adjuvant PBRT after complete surgical resection at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) between October 2015 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 18 patients received adjuvant proton beam therapy (54–60 GyE/27–30 fractions) and 20 received adjuvant carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) (54–60 GyE/18–20 fractions). Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (version 4.03). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 21 (range, 3–45) months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.3%, 87.4%, 94.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The rates after proton beam therapy vs. CIRT were 94.1% vs. 91.7% (P=0.96), 88.1% vs. 86.2% (P=0.96), 94.4% vs. 93.3% (P=0.97), and 88.1% vs. 92.9% (P=0.57), respectively. Furthermore, 16 of the 18 (88.9%) patients developed acute grade I/II dermatitis (13 grade I; 3 grade II) after proton beam therapy, and only 7 of the 20 (35%) patients developed acute grade I dermatitis after CIRT (P=0.001). The incidence of acute grade I/II mucositis and xerostomia in proton and carbon ion cases were 45% vs. 55% (P=0.75) and 56% vs. 50% (P=0.87) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant proton beam therapy and CIRT after radical surgical resection for head and neck cancers provided satisfactory therapeutic effectiveness, but no significant difference was observed between the two radiotherapy technologies. However, adjuvant CIRT was associated with a more favorable acute toxicity profile as compared to proton beam therapy with significantly lower frequency and severity of acute dermatitis observed. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9761156/ /pubmed/36544652 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5078 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Huang, Qingting
Hu, Jiyi
Hu, Weixu
Gao, Jing
Yang, Jing
Qiu, Xianxin
Lu, Jiade Jay
Kong, Lin
Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative proton versus carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544652
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5078
work_keys_str_mv AT huangqingting comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT hujiyi comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT huweixu comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT gaojing comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT yangjing comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT qiuxianxin comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT lujiadejay comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers
AT konglin comparisonoftheefficacyandtoxicityofpostoperativeprotonversuscarbonionradiotherapyforheadandneckcancers