Cargando…

The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes

Background. Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who are facing a lower-limb amputation often require a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) or a transtibial amputation (TTA). A TMA preserves more of the patient’s limb and may provide better mobility but has a lower probability of primary wou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poehler, Diana, Czerniecki, Joseph, Norvell, Daniel, Henderson, Alison, Dolan, James, Devine, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36545397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683221143765
_version_ 1784852661603926016
author Poehler, Diana
Czerniecki, Joseph
Norvell, Daniel
Henderson, Alison
Dolan, James
Devine, Beth
author_facet Poehler, Diana
Czerniecki, Joseph
Norvell, Daniel
Henderson, Alison
Dolan, James
Devine, Beth
author_sort Poehler, Diana
collection PubMed
description Background. Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who are facing a lower-limb amputation often require a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) or a transtibial amputation (TTA). A TMA preserves more of the patient’s limb and may provide better mobility but has a lower probability of primary wound healing relative to a TTA and may result in additional amputation surgeries. Understanding the differences in how patients and providers prioritize key outcomes may enhance the amputation decisional process. Purpose. To develop and pilot test a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool to elicit patient values around amputation-level selection and compare those with provider perceptions of patient values. Methods. We conducted literature reviews to identify and measure the performance of criteria important to patients. Because the quantitative literature was sparse, we developed a Sheffield elicitation framework exercise to elicit criteria performance from subject matter experts. We piloted our MCDA among patients and providers to understand tool acceptability and preliminarily assess differences in patient and provider priorities. Results. Five criteria of importance were identified: ability to walk, healing after amputation surgery, rehabilitation intensity, limb length, and prosthetic/orthotic device ease. Patients and providers successfully completed the MCDA and identified challenges in doing so. We propose potential solutions to these challenges. The results of the pilot test suggest differences in patient and provider outcome priorities. Limitations. The pilot test study enrolled a small sample of providers and patients. Conclusions. We successfully implemented the pilot study to patients and providers, received helpful feedback, and identified solutions to improve the tool. Implications. Once modified, our MCDA tool will be suitable for wider rollout. HIGHLIGHTS: Patients and providers have successfully completed our MCDA, and patients feel the MCDA may be useful in clinical practice. We encountered several methodologic challenges and identified approaches to ease participant burden. When data are sparse, using the Sheffield elicitation framework is helpful in creating a performance matrix, although patients relied largely on their amputation experiences to complete the exercise. Blinding the alternatives may help patients better understand the process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9761219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97612192022-12-20 The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes Poehler, Diana Czerniecki, Joseph Norvell, Daniel Henderson, Alison Dolan, James Devine, Beth MDM Policy Pract Original Research Article Background. Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who are facing a lower-limb amputation often require a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) or a transtibial amputation (TTA). A TMA preserves more of the patient’s limb and may provide better mobility but has a lower probability of primary wound healing relative to a TTA and may result in additional amputation surgeries. Understanding the differences in how patients and providers prioritize key outcomes may enhance the amputation decisional process. Purpose. To develop and pilot test a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool to elicit patient values around amputation-level selection and compare those with provider perceptions of patient values. Methods. We conducted literature reviews to identify and measure the performance of criteria important to patients. Because the quantitative literature was sparse, we developed a Sheffield elicitation framework exercise to elicit criteria performance from subject matter experts. We piloted our MCDA among patients and providers to understand tool acceptability and preliminarily assess differences in patient and provider priorities. Results. Five criteria of importance were identified: ability to walk, healing after amputation surgery, rehabilitation intensity, limb length, and prosthetic/orthotic device ease. Patients and providers successfully completed the MCDA and identified challenges in doing so. We propose potential solutions to these challenges. The results of the pilot test suggest differences in patient and provider outcome priorities. Limitations. The pilot test study enrolled a small sample of providers and patients. Conclusions. We successfully implemented the pilot study to patients and providers, received helpful feedback, and identified solutions to improve the tool. Implications. Once modified, our MCDA tool will be suitable for wider rollout. HIGHLIGHTS: Patients and providers have successfully completed our MCDA, and patients feel the MCDA may be useful in clinical practice. We encountered several methodologic challenges and identified approaches to ease participant burden. When data are sparse, using the Sheffield elicitation framework is helpful in creating a performance matrix, although patients relied largely on their amputation experiences to complete the exercise. Blinding the alternatives may help patients better understand the process. SAGE Publications 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9761219/ /pubmed/36545397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683221143765 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Poehler, Diana
Czerniecki, Joseph
Norvell, Daniel
Henderson, Alison
Dolan, James
Devine, Beth
The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes
title The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes
title_full The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes
title_fullStr The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes
title_short The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes
title_sort development and pilot study of a multiple criteria decision analysis (mcda) to compare patient and provider priorities around amputation-level outcomes
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36545397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683221143765
work_keys_str_mv AT poehlerdiana thedevelopmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT czernieckijoseph thedevelopmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT norvelldaniel thedevelopmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT hendersonalison thedevelopmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT dolanjames thedevelopmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT devinebeth thedevelopmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT poehlerdiana developmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT czernieckijoseph developmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT norvelldaniel developmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT hendersonalison developmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT dolanjames developmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes
AT devinebeth developmentandpilotstudyofamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismcdatocomparepatientandproviderprioritiesaroundamputationleveloutcomes