Cargando…

Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: The most frequently used office-based procedures in hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are rubber band ligation (RBL) and sclerotherapy. Few studies have been published comparing the various types of instrumental therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salgueiro, Paulo, Ramos, Maria Inês, Castro-Poças, Fernando, Libânio, Diogo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36545183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522171
_version_ 1784852692525383680
author Salgueiro, Paulo
Ramos, Maria Inês
Castro-Poças, Fernando
Libânio, Diogo
author_facet Salgueiro, Paulo
Ramos, Maria Inês
Castro-Poças, Fernando
Libânio, Diogo
author_sort Salgueiro, Paulo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The most frequently used office-based procedures in hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are rubber band ligation (RBL) and sclerotherapy. Few studies have been published comparing the various types of instrumental therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy and RBL. METHODS: Three online databases were searched. Efficacy (control of symptoms, prolapse, bleeding and pain, patients' satisfaction, and disease recurrence) and safety (complications, such as pain and bleeding) were the assessed outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) were computed for each outcome using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and I<sup>2</sup>. RESULTS: Six RCTs and three cohort studies were included. Control of prolapse and bleeding was significantly higher with RBL (93.1% RBL vs. 66.4% sclerotherapy, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12–1.60 and 89.1% RBL vs. 78.7% SCL, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02–1.34, respectively). Both techniques had similar results in terms of pain relief, overall control of symptoms, and risk of recurrence at 3 months. Although patient satisfaction was significantly higher with RBL (77.8% RBL vs. 46.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01–2.50), post-procedural pain was significantly higher with this technique (24% RBL vs. 14% sclerotherapy, RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.32–2.28). There was no significant difference regarding post-procedure bleeding (11.1% RBL vs. 8.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.86–1.94). In the subgroup analysis, according to the HD grade, post-procedure pain was higher with RBL only in HD grade II (vs. HD grade I–III). CONCLUSIONS: RBL performs better than sclerotherapy in controlling HD symptoms, specifically prolapse and bleeding, although post-procedural pain is a frequent complication. Recurrence is similar with both procedures. While waiting for the publication of results with sclerotherapy with new sclerosants, RBL remains the office-based treatment of choice in HD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9761374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97613742022-12-20 Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Salgueiro, Paulo Ramos, Maria Inês Castro-Poças, Fernando Libânio, Diogo GE Port J Gastroenterol Research Article INTRODUCTION: The most frequently used office-based procedures in hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are rubber band ligation (RBL) and sclerotherapy. Few studies have been published comparing the various types of instrumental therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy and RBL. METHODS: Three online databases were searched. Efficacy (control of symptoms, prolapse, bleeding and pain, patients' satisfaction, and disease recurrence) and safety (complications, such as pain and bleeding) were the assessed outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) were computed for each outcome using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and I<sup>2</sup>. RESULTS: Six RCTs and three cohort studies were included. Control of prolapse and bleeding was significantly higher with RBL (93.1% RBL vs. 66.4% sclerotherapy, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12–1.60 and 89.1% RBL vs. 78.7% SCL, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02–1.34, respectively). Both techniques had similar results in terms of pain relief, overall control of symptoms, and risk of recurrence at 3 months. Although patient satisfaction was significantly higher with RBL (77.8% RBL vs. 46.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01–2.50), post-procedural pain was significantly higher with this technique (24% RBL vs. 14% sclerotherapy, RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.32–2.28). There was no significant difference regarding post-procedure bleeding (11.1% RBL vs. 8.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.86–1.94). In the subgroup analysis, according to the HD grade, post-procedure pain was higher with RBL only in HD grade II (vs. HD grade I–III). CONCLUSIONS: RBL performs better than sclerotherapy in controlling HD symptoms, specifically prolapse and bleeding, although post-procedural pain is a frequent complication. Recurrence is similar with both procedures. While waiting for the publication of results with sclerotherapy with new sclerosants, RBL remains the office-based treatment of choice in HD. S. Karger AG 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9761374/ /pubmed/36545183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522171 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salgueiro, Paulo
Ramos, Maria Inês
Castro-Poças, Fernando
Libânio, Diogo
Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy − Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort office-based procedures in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: rubber band ligation versus sclerotherapy − systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9761374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36545183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522171
work_keys_str_mv AT salgueiropaulo officebasedproceduresinthemanagementofhemorrhoidaldiseaserubberbandligationversussclerotherapysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramosmariaines officebasedproceduresinthemanagementofhemorrhoidaldiseaserubberbandligationversussclerotherapysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT castropocasfernando officebasedproceduresinthemanagementofhemorrhoidaldiseaserubberbandligationversussclerotherapysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT libaniodiogo officebasedproceduresinthemanagementofhemorrhoidaldiseaserubberbandligationversussclerotherapysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis