Cargando…

Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study

BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for hospital-to-home transitional care interventions to prepare family caregivers for patients’ post-discharge care in rural communities. Four evidence-based interventions (named discharge planning, treatments, warning signs, and physical activity) have the poten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Mary T., Butler, Jeffrey I., Sidani, Souraya, Alzghoul, Manal M., Skinner, Mark, Amell, Travis, Ferguson-Paré, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36534678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279187
_version_ 1784852892312666112
author Fox, Mary T.
Butler, Jeffrey I.
Sidani, Souraya
Alzghoul, Manal M.
Skinner, Mark
Amell, Travis
Ferguson-Paré, Mary
author_facet Fox, Mary T.
Butler, Jeffrey I.
Sidani, Souraya
Alzghoul, Manal M.
Skinner, Mark
Amell, Travis
Ferguson-Paré, Mary
author_sort Fox, Mary T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for hospital-to-home transitional care interventions to prepare family caregivers for patients’ post-discharge care in rural communities. Four evidence-based interventions (named discharge planning, treatments, warning signs, and physical activity) have the potential to meet this need but family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of the interventions have not been examined. This gap is significant because unacceptable interventions are unlikely to be used or used as designed, thereby undermining outcome achievement. Accordingly, this study examined the perceived acceptability of the four interventions to rural family caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-method descriptive design was used. The quantitative method entailed the administration of an established scale to assess the interventions’ perceived acceptability to family caregivers. The qualitative method involved semi-structured interviews to explore family caregivers’ perceived acceptability of the interventions in greater depth, including acceptable and unacceptable aspects, in the context of their own transitional care experience. Participants were the family caregivers of a relative who had been discharged home in a rural community from an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: The purposive sample included 16 participants who were mostly middle-aged women (n = 14; 87.5%) caring for a parent (n = 9; 56.3%) at high risk for hospital readmission. The mean scores on the acceptability measure were 3 or higher for all interventions, indicating that, on average, the four interventions were perceived as acceptable. In terms of acceptable aspects, four themes were identified: the interventions: 1) involve family caregivers and proactively prepare them for discharge, 2) provide clear, written, and detailed guidance, 3) place the onus on healthcare providers to initiate communication, and 4) ensure post-discharge follow-up. In terms of unacceptable aspects, one theme was identified: the physical activity intervention would be challenging to implement. DISCUSSION: The findings support implementing the four interventions in practice throughout the hospital-to-home transition. Healthcare providers should assess family caregivers’ comfort in participating in the physical activity intervention and tailor their role accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9762580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97625802022-12-20 Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study Fox, Mary T. Butler, Jeffrey I. Sidani, Souraya Alzghoul, Manal M. Skinner, Mark Amell, Travis Ferguson-Paré, Mary PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for hospital-to-home transitional care interventions to prepare family caregivers for patients’ post-discharge care in rural communities. Four evidence-based interventions (named discharge planning, treatments, warning signs, and physical activity) have the potential to meet this need but family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of the interventions have not been examined. This gap is significant because unacceptable interventions are unlikely to be used or used as designed, thereby undermining outcome achievement. Accordingly, this study examined the perceived acceptability of the four interventions to rural family caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-method descriptive design was used. The quantitative method entailed the administration of an established scale to assess the interventions’ perceived acceptability to family caregivers. The qualitative method involved semi-structured interviews to explore family caregivers’ perceived acceptability of the interventions in greater depth, including acceptable and unacceptable aspects, in the context of their own transitional care experience. Participants were the family caregivers of a relative who had been discharged home in a rural community from an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: The purposive sample included 16 participants who were mostly middle-aged women (n = 14; 87.5%) caring for a parent (n = 9; 56.3%) at high risk for hospital readmission. The mean scores on the acceptability measure were 3 or higher for all interventions, indicating that, on average, the four interventions were perceived as acceptable. In terms of acceptable aspects, four themes were identified: the interventions: 1) involve family caregivers and proactively prepare them for discharge, 2) provide clear, written, and detailed guidance, 3) place the onus on healthcare providers to initiate communication, and 4) ensure post-discharge follow-up. In terms of unacceptable aspects, one theme was identified: the physical activity intervention would be challenging to implement. DISCUSSION: The findings support implementing the four interventions in practice throughout the hospital-to-home transition. Healthcare providers should assess family caregivers’ comfort in participating in the physical activity intervention and tailor their role accordingly. Public Library of Science 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9762580/ /pubmed/36534678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279187 Text en © 2022 Fox et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fox, Mary T.
Butler, Jeffrey I.
Sidani, Souraya
Alzghoul, Manal M.
Skinner, Mark
Amell, Travis
Ferguson-Paré, Mary
Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study
title Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study
title_full Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study
title_fullStr Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study
title_full_unstemmed Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study
title_short Family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: A multi-method study
title_sort family caregivers’ perspectives on the acceptability of four interventions proposed for rural transitional care: a multi-method study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36534678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279187
work_keys_str_mv AT foxmaryt familycaregiversperspectivesontheacceptabilityoffourinterventionsproposedforruraltransitionalcareamultimethodstudy
AT butlerjeffreyi familycaregiversperspectivesontheacceptabilityoffourinterventionsproposedforruraltransitionalcareamultimethodstudy
AT sidanisouraya familycaregiversperspectivesontheacceptabilityoffourinterventionsproposedforruraltransitionalcareamultimethodstudy
AT alzghoulmanalm familycaregiversperspectivesontheacceptabilityoffourinterventionsproposedforruraltransitionalcareamultimethodstudy
AT skinnermark familycaregiversperspectivesontheacceptabilityoffourinterventionsproposedforruraltransitionalcareamultimethodstudy
AT amelltravis familycaregiversperspectivesontheacceptabilityoffourinterventionsproposedforruraltransitionalcareamultimethodstudy
AT fergusonparemary familycaregiversperspectivesontheacceptabilityoffourinterventionsproposedforruraltransitionalcareamultimethodstudy