Cargando…

Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Machine Learning to Predict Individual Patient-reported Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up

We developed, tested, and validated machine learning algorithms to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up to facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women with breast cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Satisfaction with breasts is a key outcome for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfob, André, Mehrara, Babak J., Nelson, Jonas A., Wilkins, Edwin G., Pusic, Andrea L., Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862
Descripción
Sumario:We developed, tested, and validated machine learning algorithms to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up to facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women with breast cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Satisfaction with breasts is a key outcome for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction. Current decision-making relies on group-level evidence which may lead to suboptimal treatment recommendations for individuals. METHODS: We trained, tested, and validated 3 machine learning algorithms using data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction conducted at eleven study sites in North America from 2011 to 2016. Data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction were collected before surgery and at 1-year follow-up. Data from 10 of the 11 sites were randomly split into training and test samples (2:1 ratio) to develop and test 3 algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty, extreme gradient boosting tree, and neural network) which were further validated using the additional site’s data. AUC to predict clinically-significant changes in satisfaction with breasts at 1-year follow-up using the validated BREAST-Q were the outcome measures. RESULTS: The 3 algorithms performed equally well when predicting both improved or decreased satisfaction with breasts in both testing and validation datasets: For the testing dataset median accuracy = 0.81 (range 0.73–0.83), median AUC = 0.84 (range 0.78–0.85). For the validation dataset median accuracy = 0.83 (range 0.81–0.84), median AUC = 0.86 (range 0.83–0.89). CONCLUSION: Individual patient-reported outcomes can be accurately predicted using machine learning algorithms, which may facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women undergoing breast cancer treatment.