Cargando…
Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Machine Learning to Predict Individual Patient-reported Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up
We developed, tested, and validated machine learning algorithms to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up to facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women with breast cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Satisfaction with breasts is a key outcome for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862 |
Sumario: | We developed, tested, and validated machine learning algorithms to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up to facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women with breast cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Satisfaction with breasts is a key outcome for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction. Current decision-making relies on group-level evidence which may lead to suboptimal treatment recommendations for individuals. METHODS: We trained, tested, and validated 3 machine learning algorithms using data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction conducted at eleven study sites in North America from 2011 to 2016. Data from 1921 women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and reconstruction were collected before surgery and at 1-year follow-up. Data from 10 of the 11 sites were randomly split into training and test samples (2:1 ratio) to develop and test 3 algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty, extreme gradient boosting tree, and neural network) which were further validated using the additional site’s data. AUC to predict clinically-significant changes in satisfaction with breasts at 1-year follow-up using the validated BREAST-Q were the outcome measures. RESULTS: The 3 algorithms performed equally well when predicting both improved or decreased satisfaction with breasts in both testing and validation datasets: For the testing dataset median accuracy = 0.81 (range 0.73–0.83), median AUC = 0.84 (range 0.78–0.85). For the validation dataset median accuracy = 0.83 (range 0.81–0.84), median AUC = 0.86 (range 0.83–0.89). CONCLUSION: Individual patient-reported outcomes can be accurately predicted using machine learning algorithms, which may facilitate individualized, patient-centered decision-making for women undergoing breast cancer treatment. |
---|