Cargando…
Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond
The aim of this review was to review the ethical and multidisciplinary clinical challenges facing trauma surgeons when resuscitating patients presenting with penetrating brain injury (PBI) and multicavitary trauma. BACKGROUND: While there is a significant gap in the literature on managing PBI in pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005608 |
_version_ | 1784852921473564672 |
---|---|
author | Zakrison, Tanya L. Essig, Rachael Polcari, Ann McKinley, William Arnold, Damon Beyene, Robel Wilson, Kenneth Rogers, Selwyn Matthews, Jeffrey B. Millis, J. Michael Angelos, Peter O’Connor, Michael Mansour, Ali Goldenberg, Fernando Spiegel, Thomas Horowitz, Peleg Das, Paramita Slidell, Mark Chokshi, Nikunj Okeke, Iheoma Barth, Rolf Wilkins, Harry E. Kass-Hout, Tareq Lazaridis, Christos |
author_facet | Zakrison, Tanya L. Essig, Rachael Polcari, Ann McKinley, William Arnold, Damon Beyene, Robel Wilson, Kenneth Rogers, Selwyn Matthews, Jeffrey B. Millis, J. Michael Angelos, Peter O’Connor, Michael Mansour, Ali Goldenberg, Fernando Spiegel, Thomas Horowitz, Peleg Das, Paramita Slidell, Mark Chokshi, Nikunj Okeke, Iheoma Barth, Rolf Wilkins, Harry E. Kass-Hout, Tareq Lazaridis, Christos |
author_sort | Zakrison, Tanya L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this review was to review the ethical and multidisciplinary clinical challenges facing trauma surgeons when resuscitating patients presenting with penetrating brain injury (PBI) and multicavitary trauma. BACKGROUND: While there is a significant gap in the literature on managing PBI in patients presenting with multisystem trauma, recent data demonstrate that resuscitation and prognostic features for such patients remains poorly described, with trauma guidelines out of date in this field. METHODS: We reviewed a combination of recent multidisciplinary evidence-informed guidelines for PBI and coupled this with expert opinion from trauma, neurosurgery, neurocritical care, pediatric and transplant surgery, surgical ethics and importantly our community partners. RESULTS: Traditional prognostic signs utilized in traumatic brain injury may not be applicable to PBI with a multidisciplinary team approach suggested on a case-by-case basis. Even with no role for neurosurgical intervention, neurocritical care, and neurointerventional support may be warranted, in parallel to multicavitary operative intervention. Special considerations should be afforded for pediatric PBI. Ethical considerations center on providing the patient with the best chance of survival. Consideration of organ donation should be considered as part of the continuum of patient, proxy and family-centric support and care. Community input is crucial in guiding decision making or protocol establishment on an institutional level. CONCLUSIONS: Support of the patient after multicavitary PBI can be complex and is best addressed in a multidisciplinary fashion with extensive community involvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9762724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97627242022-12-20 Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond Zakrison, Tanya L. Essig, Rachael Polcari, Ann McKinley, William Arnold, Damon Beyene, Robel Wilson, Kenneth Rogers, Selwyn Matthews, Jeffrey B. Millis, J. Michael Angelos, Peter O’Connor, Michael Mansour, Ali Goldenberg, Fernando Spiegel, Thomas Horowitz, Peleg Das, Paramita Slidell, Mark Chokshi, Nikunj Okeke, Iheoma Barth, Rolf Wilkins, Harry E. Kass-Hout, Tareq Lazaridis, Christos Ann Surg Review Article The aim of this review was to review the ethical and multidisciplinary clinical challenges facing trauma surgeons when resuscitating patients presenting with penetrating brain injury (PBI) and multicavitary trauma. BACKGROUND: While there is a significant gap in the literature on managing PBI in patients presenting with multisystem trauma, recent data demonstrate that resuscitation and prognostic features for such patients remains poorly described, with trauma guidelines out of date in this field. METHODS: We reviewed a combination of recent multidisciplinary evidence-informed guidelines for PBI and coupled this with expert opinion from trauma, neurosurgery, neurocritical care, pediatric and transplant surgery, surgical ethics and importantly our community partners. RESULTS: Traditional prognostic signs utilized in traumatic brain injury may not be applicable to PBI with a multidisciplinary team approach suggested on a case-by-case basis. Even with no role for neurosurgical intervention, neurocritical care, and neurointerventional support may be warranted, in parallel to multicavitary operative intervention. Special considerations should be afforded for pediatric PBI. Ethical considerations center on providing the patient with the best chance of survival. Consideration of organ donation should be considered as part of the continuum of patient, proxy and family-centric support and care. Community input is crucial in guiding decision making or protocol establishment on an institutional level. CONCLUSIONS: Support of the patient after multicavitary PBI can be complex and is best addressed in a multidisciplinary fashion with extensive community involvement. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9762724/ /pubmed/35997268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005608 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Review Article Zakrison, Tanya L. Essig, Rachael Polcari, Ann McKinley, William Arnold, Damon Beyene, Robel Wilson, Kenneth Rogers, Selwyn Matthews, Jeffrey B. Millis, J. Michael Angelos, Peter O’Connor, Michael Mansour, Ali Goldenberg, Fernando Spiegel, Thomas Horowitz, Peleg Das, Paramita Slidell, Mark Chokshi, Nikunj Okeke, Iheoma Barth, Rolf Wilkins, Harry E. Kass-Hout, Tareq Lazaridis, Christos Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond |
title | Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond |
title_full | Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond |
title_fullStr | Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond |
title_full_unstemmed | Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond |
title_short | Review Paper on Penetrating Brain Injury: Ethical Quandaries in the Trauma Bay and Beyond |
title_sort | review paper on penetrating brain injury: ethical quandaries in the trauma bay and beyond |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zakrisontanyal reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT essigrachael reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT polcariann reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT mckinleywilliam reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT arnolddamon reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT beyenerobel reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT wilsonkenneth reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT rogersselwyn reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT matthewsjeffreyb reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT millisjmichael reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT angelospeter reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT oconnormichael reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT mansourali reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT goldenbergfernando reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT spiegelthomas reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT horowitzpeleg reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT dasparamita reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT slidellmark reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT chokshinikunj reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT okekeiheoma reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT barthrolf reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT wilkinsharrye reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT kasshouttareq reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond AT lazaridischristos reviewpaperonpenetratingbraininjuryethicalquandariesinthetraumabayandbeyond |