Cargando…
Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients
To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the patients who underwent prone positioning during their COVID-19 illness in the hospital. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. PARTICIPANTS: COVID-19–recovered patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000824 |
_version_ | 1784852951291920384 |
---|---|
author | Sethi, Sher M. Hirani, Sana Iqbal, Rodaba Ahmed, Amber S. |
author_facet | Sethi, Sher M. Hirani, Sana Iqbal, Rodaba Ahmed, Amber S. |
author_sort | Sethi, Sher M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the patients who underwent prone positioning during their COVID-19 illness in the hospital. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. PARTICIPANTS: COVID-19–recovered patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Knowledge was assessed by five questions with a dichotomous response (yes/no). An yes response was awarded 1 score. Since there were five questions, five would be the highest score. Patients’ perceptions of the therapy were assessed by four questions, each scored on a Likert scale of 5 (5 = strongly agree, 4 = agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = disagree, and 1 = strongly disagree). As it had four questions, the maximum score achieved could therefore be 20. Proning practices were assessed using seven questions: four were used to calculate practice scores, whereas three were open-ended regarding the patient’s experience. Each question carries a different score, and the maximum score was 8. RESULTS: The study included 98 patients. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (sd, 12.2 yr). Majority of the patients were males (70.4%). 69.1% of males and 76.6% of females fell in the poor knowledge group. The poor knowledge cohort had an educational level of 48% in high school, 45.5% in graduates, and 6% in postgraduates. Compared with 56.5% of males, 73% of females preferred prone positioning. Sixty percent of those with a high school education viewed prone positioning favorably, whereas 46% of those with graduate and postgraduate did. Seventy-nine percent of males and 63% of females scored positively on the practice questionnaire. Eighty percent of graduates and postgraduates preferred proning practices to 67% of participants with high school education levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study population had a little understanding of awake proning, found it unpleasant, and practiced for a shorter period than advised. Despite the overall negative attitude toward the position, our patients highly recommend this position to future patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9762918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97629182022-12-22 Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients Sethi, Sher M. Hirani, Sana Iqbal, Rodaba Ahmed, Amber S. Crit Care Explor Observational Study To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the patients who underwent prone positioning during their COVID-19 illness in the hospital. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. PARTICIPANTS: COVID-19–recovered patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Knowledge was assessed by five questions with a dichotomous response (yes/no). An yes response was awarded 1 score. Since there were five questions, five would be the highest score. Patients’ perceptions of the therapy were assessed by four questions, each scored on a Likert scale of 5 (5 = strongly agree, 4 = agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = disagree, and 1 = strongly disagree). As it had four questions, the maximum score achieved could therefore be 20. Proning practices were assessed using seven questions: four were used to calculate practice scores, whereas three were open-ended regarding the patient’s experience. Each question carries a different score, and the maximum score was 8. RESULTS: The study included 98 patients. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (sd, 12.2 yr). Majority of the patients were males (70.4%). 69.1% of males and 76.6% of females fell in the poor knowledge group. The poor knowledge cohort had an educational level of 48% in high school, 45.5% in graduates, and 6% in postgraduates. Compared with 56.5% of males, 73% of females preferred prone positioning. Sixty percent of those with a high school education viewed prone positioning favorably, whereas 46% of those with graduate and postgraduate did. Seventy-nine percent of males and 63% of females scored positively on the practice questionnaire. Eighty percent of graduates and postgraduates preferred proning practices to 67% of participants with high school education levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study population had a little understanding of awake proning, found it unpleasant, and practiced for a shorter period than advised. Despite the overall negative attitude toward the position, our patients highly recommend this position to future patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9762918/ /pubmed/36567783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000824 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Sethi, Sher M. Hirani, Sana Iqbal, Rodaba Ahmed, Amber S. Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients |
title | Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients |
title_full | Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients |
title_fullStr | Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients |
title_short | Patient’s Perspective of Awake Proning: A Cross-Sectional Interview-Based Survey From COVID-19–Recovered Patients |
title_sort | patient’s perspective of awake proning: a cross-sectional interview-based survey from covid-19–recovered patients |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9762918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sethisherm patientsperspectiveofawakeproningacrosssectionalinterviewbasedsurveyfromcovid19recoveredpatients AT hiranisana patientsperspectiveofawakeproningacrosssectionalinterviewbasedsurveyfromcovid19recoveredpatients AT iqbalrodaba patientsperspectiveofawakeproningacrosssectionalinterviewbasedsurveyfromcovid19recoveredpatients AT ahmedambers patientsperspectiveofawakeproningacrosssectionalinterviewbasedsurveyfromcovid19recoveredpatients |