Cargando…
Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study
OBJECTIVES: Patient safety events (PSEs) are unwanted or unexpected events that occur during medical care. High cognitive loads and frequent interruptions make emergency departments (EDs) uniquely error prone environments. Yet, frontline clinicians rarely report PSEs using incident reporting systems...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2 |
_version_ | 1784852986690797568 |
---|---|
author | Skutezky, Trevor Small, Serena S. Peddie, David Balka, Ellen Hohl, Corinne M. |
author_facet | Skutezky, Trevor Small, Serena S. Peddie, David Balka, Ellen Hohl, Corinne M. |
author_sort | Skutezky, Trevor |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Patient safety events (PSEs) are unwanted or unexpected events that occur during medical care. High cognitive loads and frequent interruptions make emergency departments (EDs) uniquely error prone environments. Yet, frontline clinicians rarely report PSEs using incident reporting systems. The incidence, severity, and preventability of PSEs thus remain poorly understood, and contributing factors are understudied. We sought to understand ED staff beliefs and perceptions about their PSE reporting system and what features they believe are important in such a system. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study among healthcare providers working in the ED and departmental leadership. We recruited participants via email and held a series of interviews, focus groups, and participatory workshops. We iteratively analyzed the data using the constant comparative method and used thematic analysis to establish themes. RESULTS: 50 participants attended at least one focus group, interview, or workshop. Participants perceived that PSE reporting through formal channels in the ED was challenging. Clinicians had an inherent desire to report PSEs and do so through numerous informal channels, yet underreported in formal reporting systems. The current PSE reporting system did not meet frontline staff needs and was viewed as ineffective in improving care quality and safety. We identified three key features for an improved PSE reporting system: (1) clear definitions; (2) transparency; and (3) simplicity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have identified ideal features for PSE reporting processes to meet the needs of both frontline staff and departmental leadership based on perceptions of current PSE reporting practices. Improved PSE reporting processes have the potential to increase PSE reporting in the ED overall, increasing the availability of information about PSEs to support quality improvement and improve patient safety. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9763130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97631302022-12-21 Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study Skutezky, Trevor Small, Serena S. Peddie, David Balka, Ellen Hohl, Corinne M. CJEM Original Research OBJECTIVES: Patient safety events (PSEs) are unwanted or unexpected events that occur during medical care. High cognitive loads and frequent interruptions make emergency departments (EDs) uniquely error prone environments. Yet, frontline clinicians rarely report PSEs using incident reporting systems. The incidence, severity, and preventability of PSEs thus remain poorly understood, and contributing factors are understudied. We sought to understand ED staff beliefs and perceptions about their PSE reporting system and what features they believe are important in such a system. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study among healthcare providers working in the ED and departmental leadership. We recruited participants via email and held a series of interviews, focus groups, and participatory workshops. We iteratively analyzed the data using the constant comparative method and used thematic analysis to establish themes. RESULTS: 50 participants attended at least one focus group, interview, or workshop. Participants perceived that PSE reporting through formal channels in the ED was challenging. Clinicians had an inherent desire to report PSEs and do so through numerous informal channels, yet underreported in formal reporting systems. The current PSE reporting system did not meet frontline staff needs and was viewed as ineffective in improving care quality and safety. We identified three key features for an improved PSE reporting system: (1) clear definitions; (2) transparency; and (3) simplicity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have identified ideal features for PSE reporting processes to meet the needs of both frontline staff and departmental leadership based on perceptions of current PSE reporting practices. Improved PSE reporting processes have the potential to increase PSE reporting in the ED overall, increasing the availability of information about PSEs to support quality improvement and improve patient safety. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9763130/ /pubmed/36344901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Skutezky, Trevor Small, Serena S. Peddie, David Balka, Ellen Hohl, Corinne M. Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study |
title | Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study |
title_full | Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study |
title_short | Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study |
title_sort | beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a canadian emergency department: a qualitative study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skutezkytrevor beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy AT smallserenas beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy AT peddiedavid beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy AT balkaellen beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy AT hohlcorinnem beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy |