Cargando…

Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: Patient safety events (PSEs) are unwanted or unexpected events that occur during medical care. High cognitive loads and frequent interruptions make emergency departments (EDs) uniquely error prone environments. Yet, frontline clinicians rarely report PSEs using incident reporting systems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skutezky, Trevor, Small, Serena S., Peddie, David, Balka, Ellen, Hohl, Corinne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2
_version_ 1784852986690797568
author Skutezky, Trevor
Small, Serena S.
Peddie, David
Balka, Ellen
Hohl, Corinne M.
author_facet Skutezky, Trevor
Small, Serena S.
Peddie, David
Balka, Ellen
Hohl, Corinne M.
author_sort Skutezky, Trevor
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patient safety events (PSEs) are unwanted or unexpected events that occur during medical care. High cognitive loads and frequent interruptions make emergency departments (EDs) uniquely error prone environments. Yet, frontline clinicians rarely report PSEs using incident reporting systems. The incidence, severity, and preventability of PSEs thus remain poorly understood, and contributing factors are understudied. We sought to understand ED staff beliefs and perceptions about their PSE reporting system and what features they believe are important in such a system. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study among healthcare providers working in the ED and departmental leadership. We recruited participants via email and held a series of interviews, focus groups, and participatory workshops. We iteratively analyzed the data using the constant comparative method and used thematic analysis to establish themes. RESULTS: 50 participants attended at least one focus group, interview, or workshop. Participants perceived that PSE reporting through formal channels in the ED was challenging. Clinicians had an inherent desire to report PSEs and do so through numerous informal channels, yet underreported in formal reporting systems. The current PSE reporting system did not meet frontline staff needs and was viewed as ineffective in improving care quality and safety. We identified three key features for an improved PSE reporting system: (1) clear definitions; (2) transparency; and (3) simplicity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have identified ideal features for PSE reporting processes to meet the needs of both frontline staff and departmental leadership based on perceptions of current PSE reporting practices. Improved PSE reporting processes have the potential to increase PSE reporting in the ED overall, increasing the availability of information about PSEs to support quality improvement and improve patient safety. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9763130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97631302022-12-21 Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study Skutezky, Trevor Small, Serena S. Peddie, David Balka, Ellen Hohl, Corinne M. CJEM Original Research OBJECTIVES: Patient safety events (PSEs) are unwanted or unexpected events that occur during medical care. High cognitive loads and frequent interruptions make emergency departments (EDs) uniquely error prone environments. Yet, frontline clinicians rarely report PSEs using incident reporting systems. The incidence, severity, and preventability of PSEs thus remain poorly understood, and contributing factors are understudied. We sought to understand ED staff beliefs and perceptions about their PSE reporting system and what features they believe are important in such a system. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study among healthcare providers working in the ED and departmental leadership. We recruited participants via email and held a series of interviews, focus groups, and participatory workshops. We iteratively analyzed the data using the constant comparative method and used thematic analysis to establish themes. RESULTS: 50 participants attended at least one focus group, interview, or workshop. Participants perceived that PSE reporting through formal channels in the ED was challenging. Clinicians had an inherent desire to report PSEs and do so through numerous informal channels, yet underreported in formal reporting systems. The current PSE reporting system did not meet frontline staff needs and was viewed as ineffective in improving care quality and safety. We identified three key features for an improved PSE reporting system: (1) clear definitions; (2) transparency; and (3) simplicity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have identified ideal features for PSE reporting processes to meet the needs of both frontline staff and departmental leadership based on perceptions of current PSE reporting practices. Improved PSE reporting processes have the potential to increase PSE reporting in the ED overall, increasing the availability of information about PSEs to support quality improvement and improve patient safety. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9763130/ /pubmed/36344901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Skutezky, Trevor
Small, Serena S.
Peddie, David
Balka, Ellen
Hohl, Corinne M.
Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study
title Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study
title_full Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study
title_short Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian Emergency Department: a qualitative study
title_sort beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a canadian emergency department: a qualitative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2
work_keys_str_mv AT skutezkytrevor beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy
AT smallserenas beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy
AT peddiedavid beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy
AT balkaellen beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy
AT hohlcorinnem beliefsandperceptionsofpatientsafetyeventreportinginacanadianemergencydepartmentaqualitativestudy