Cargando…
Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey
BACKGROUND: There is a worldwide consensus among experts that guidelines and algorithms on airway management contribute to improved patient safety in anesthesia. The present study aimed to determine the current practice of airway management of German anesthesiologists and assess the safety gap, defi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01025-3 |
_version_ | 1784852991132565504 |
---|---|
author | Pirlich, Nina Dutz, Matthias Wittenmeier, Eva Kriege, Marc Didion, Nicole Ott, Thomas Piepho, Tim |
author_facet | Pirlich, Nina Dutz, Matthias Wittenmeier, Eva Kriege, Marc Didion, Nicole Ott, Thomas Piepho, Tim |
author_sort | Pirlich, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a worldwide consensus among experts that guidelines and algorithms on airway management contribute to improved patient safety in anesthesia. The present study aimed to determine the current practice of airway management of German anesthesiologists and assess the safety gap, defined as the difference between observed and recommended practice, amongst these practitioners. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of implementing the guidelines on airway management practice in Germany amongst anesthesiologists and identify potential safety gaps. METHODS: A survey was conducted in September 2019 by contacting all registered members of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) via email. The participants were asked about their personal and institutional background, adherence to recommendations of the current German S1 guidelines and availability of airway devices. RESULTS: A total of 1862 DGAI members completed the questionnaire (response rate 17%). The main outcome was that anesthesiologists mostly adhered to the guidelines, yet certain recommendations, particularly pertaining to specifics of preoxygenation and training, showed a safety gap. More than 90% of participants had a video laryngoscope and half had performed more than 25 awake intubations using a flexible endoscope; however, only 81% had a video laryngoscope with a hyperangulated blade. An estimated 16% of all intubations were performed with a video laryngoscope, and 1 in 4 participants had performed awake intubation with it. Nearly all participants had cared for patients with suspected difficult airways. Half of the participants had already faced a “cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate” (CICO) situation and one in five had to perform an emergency front of neck access (eFONA) at least once. In this case, almost two thirds used puncture-based techniques and one third scalpel-based techniques. CONCLUSION: Current practice of airway management showed overall adherence to the current German guidelines on airway management, yet certain areas need to be improved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this paper (10.1007/s00101-021-01025-3) includes the questionnaire. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9763150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97631502022-12-21 Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey Pirlich, Nina Dutz, Matthias Wittenmeier, Eva Kriege, Marc Didion, Nicole Ott, Thomas Piepho, Tim Anaesthesiologie Originalien BACKGROUND: There is a worldwide consensus among experts that guidelines and algorithms on airway management contribute to improved patient safety in anesthesia. The present study aimed to determine the current practice of airway management of German anesthesiologists and assess the safety gap, defined as the difference between observed and recommended practice, amongst these practitioners. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of implementing the guidelines on airway management practice in Germany amongst anesthesiologists and identify potential safety gaps. METHODS: A survey was conducted in September 2019 by contacting all registered members of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) via email. The participants were asked about their personal and institutional background, adherence to recommendations of the current German S1 guidelines and availability of airway devices. RESULTS: A total of 1862 DGAI members completed the questionnaire (response rate 17%). The main outcome was that anesthesiologists mostly adhered to the guidelines, yet certain recommendations, particularly pertaining to specifics of preoxygenation and training, showed a safety gap. More than 90% of participants had a video laryngoscope and half had performed more than 25 awake intubations using a flexible endoscope; however, only 81% had a video laryngoscope with a hyperangulated blade. An estimated 16% of all intubations were performed with a video laryngoscope, and 1 in 4 participants had performed awake intubation with it. Nearly all participants had cared for patients with suspected difficult airways. Half of the participants had already faced a “cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate” (CICO) situation and one in five had to perform an emergency front of neck access (eFONA) at least once. In this case, almost two thirds used puncture-based techniques and one third scalpel-based techniques. CONCLUSION: Current practice of airway management showed overall adherence to the current German guidelines on airway management, yet certain areas need to be improved. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this paper (10.1007/s00101-021-01025-3) includes the questionnaire. Springer Medizin 2021-08-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9763150/ /pubmed/34453552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01025-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien Pirlich, Nina Dutz, Matthias Wittenmeier, Eva Kriege, Marc Didion, Nicole Ott, Thomas Piepho, Tim Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey |
title | Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey |
title_full | Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey |
title_fullStr | Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey |
title_short | Current practice of German anesthesiologists in airway management: Results of a national online survey |
title_sort | current practice of german anesthesiologists in airway management: results of a national online survey |
topic | Originalien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-01025-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pirlichnina currentpracticeofgermananesthesiologistsinairwaymanagementresultsofanationalonlinesurvey AT dutzmatthias currentpracticeofgermananesthesiologistsinairwaymanagementresultsofanationalonlinesurvey AT wittenmeiereva currentpracticeofgermananesthesiologistsinairwaymanagementresultsofanationalonlinesurvey AT kriegemarc currentpracticeofgermananesthesiologistsinairwaymanagementresultsofanationalonlinesurvey AT didionnicole currentpracticeofgermananesthesiologistsinairwaymanagementresultsofanationalonlinesurvey AT ottthomas currentpracticeofgermananesthesiologistsinairwaymanagementresultsofanationalonlinesurvey AT piephotim currentpracticeofgermananesthesiologistsinairwaymanagementresultsofanationalonlinesurvey |