Cargando…

Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures

BACKGROUND: Georgian illicit cigarette consumption was 1.5% in 2017. In 2018, a new tobacco control law took effect followed by a substantial cigarette excise tax increase in 2019. Research shows these policies reduce tobacco consumption, but the tobacco industry argues they increase illicit trade....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Little, Megan, Ross, Hana, Bakhturidze, George, Kachkachishvili, Iago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056404
_version_ 1784852992911998976
author Little, Megan
Ross, Hana
Bakhturidze, George
Kachkachishvili, Iago
author_facet Little, Megan
Ross, Hana
Bakhturidze, George
Kachkachishvili, Iago
author_sort Little, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Georgian illicit cigarette consumption was 1.5% in 2017. In 2018, a new tobacco control law took effect followed by a substantial cigarette excise tax increase in 2019. Research shows these policies reduce tobacco consumption, but the tobacco industry argues they increase illicit trade. There is limited evidence on this, particularly from developing countries. METHODS: A panel household survey in Georgia obtained data over three waves: 2017 baseline, 2018 after the tobacco control law took effect and 2019 after taxes increased. A sample of 1578 smokers (and quitters in later waves) from five regions reported their tobacco use and were asked to present a cigarette pack in their possession. These were examined for tax stamps and health warnings to establish legality. FINDINGS: There was no evidence of an increase in illicit cigarette consumption in Tbilisi, Kutaisi, Akhaltsikhe or Gori in any wave. In Zugdidi, near the Russian-occupied Abkhazia, illicit cigarette consumption was increasing even prior to the tax increase, reaching 30.9% by wave 3. A country-wide shift occurred from manufactured cigarettes to roll-your-own tobacco (whose tax remained unchanged) between waves 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: No evidence of a country-wide increase in illicit cigarette trade was found after non-fiscal tobacco measures took effect and cigarette taxes increased. Relatively high illicit cigarette consumption in Zugdidi highlights the role of disputed territories and border administration in illicit cigarette supply. Substitution towards roll-your-own tobacco after manufactured cigarette taxes increased demonstrates the importance of equalising taxes on tobacco products to maximise public health benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9763157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97631572022-12-21 Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures Little, Megan Ross, Hana Bakhturidze, George Kachkachishvili, Iago Tob Control Original Research BACKGROUND: Georgian illicit cigarette consumption was 1.5% in 2017. In 2018, a new tobacco control law took effect followed by a substantial cigarette excise tax increase in 2019. Research shows these policies reduce tobacco consumption, but the tobacco industry argues they increase illicit trade. There is limited evidence on this, particularly from developing countries. METHODS: A panel household survey in Georgia obtained data over three waves: 2017 baseline, 2018 after the tobacco control law took effect and 2019 after taxes increased. A sample of 1578 smokers (and quitters in later waves) from five regions reported their tobacco use and were asked to present a cigarette pack in their possession. These were examined for tax stamps and health warnings to establish legality. FINDINGS: There was no evidence of an increase in illicit cigarette consumption in Tbilisi, Kutaisi, Akhaltsikhe or Gori in any wave. In Zugdidi, near the Russian-occupied Abkhazia, illicit cigarette consumption was increasing even prior to the tax increase, reaching 30.9% by wave 3. A country-wide shift occurred from manufactured cigarettes to roll-your-own tobacco (whose tax remained unchanged) between waves 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: No evidence of a country-wide increase in illicit cigarette trade was found after non-fiscal tobacco measures took effect and cigarette taxes increased. Relatively high illicit cigarette consumption in Zugdidi highlights the role of disputed territories and border administration in illicit cigarette supply. Substitution towards roll-your-own tobacco after manufactured cigarette taxes increased demonstrates the importance of equalising taxes on tobacco products to maximise public health benefits. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9763157/ /pubmed/34112646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056404 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Little, Megan
Ross, Hana
Bakhturidze, George
Kachkachishvili, Iago
Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures
title Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures
title_full Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures
title_fullStr Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures
title_short Analysis of the illicit tobacco market in Georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures
title_sort analysis of the illicit tobacco market in georgia in response to fiscal and non-fiscal tobacco control measures
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056404
work_keys_str_mv AT littlemegan analysisoftheillicittobaccomarketingeorgiainresponsetofiscalandnonfiscaltobaccocontrolmeasures
AT rosshana analysisoftheillicittobaccomarketingeorgiainresponsetofiscalandnonfiscaltobaccocontrolmeasures
AT bakhturidzegeorge analysisoftheillicittobaccomarketingeorgiainresponsetofiscalandnonfiscaltobaccocontrolmeasures
AT kachkachishviliiago analysisoftheillicittobaccomarketingeorgiainresponsetofiscalandnonfiscaltobaccocontrolmeasures