Cargando…

Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study

AIMS: To identify risk factors for rebubbling, and early graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this prospective registry study, all consecutive DMEK procedures registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were assessed (n=752). Univariable and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunker, Suryan, Winkens, Bjorn, van den Biggelaar, Frank, Nuijts, Rudy, Kruit, Pieter Jan, Dickman, Mor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317041
_version_ 1784852993181483008
author Dunker, Suryan
Winkens, Bjorn
van den Biggelaar, Frank
Nuijts, Rudy
Kruit, Pieter Jan
Dickman, Mor
author_facet Dunker, Suryan
Winkens, Bjorn
van den Biggelaar, Frank
Nuijts, Rudy
Kruit, Pieter Jan
Dickman, Mor
author_sort Dunker, Suryan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To identify risk factors for rebubbling, and early graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this prospective registry study, all consecutive DMEK procedures registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were assessed (n=752). Univariable and multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression. The effect of rebubbling on endothelial cell density was analysed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: 144 of 752 (19%) eyes underwent rebubbling. Rebubbling was successful in 101 eyes (70%). In eyes that underwent rebubbling, the graft failure rate was significantly higher than eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (30% vs 9%, respectively; OR: 4.28, 95% CI 2.72 to 6.73, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for rebubbling were surgical complication (OR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.33, p=0.012) and older recipient age (OR: 1.04 (per increase of 1 year), 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.003). Risk factors for developing graft failure within 3 months were transplant before 2016 (OR: 3.32, 95% CI 1.87 to 5.90, p<0.001), and surgical complication (OR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.04, p=0.004). Throughout the study period, rebubbling and early graft failure were inversely related. Eyes that underwent rebubbling showed significantly lower endothelial cell densities at 3, 6 and 12 months compared with eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This Dutch registry study identified independent risk factors for DMEK graft detachment leading to rebubbling, namely recipient age and surgical complication, and early graft failure, namely transplantation before 2016 and surgical complication. Rebubbling was associated with significantly higher endothelial cell loss in the first year after surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9763158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97631582022-12-21 Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study Dunker, Suryan Winkens, Bjorn van den Biggelaar, Frank Nuijts, Rudy Kruit, Pieter Jan Dickman, Mor Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science AIMS: To identify risk factors for rebubbling, and early graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this prospective registry study, all consecutive DMEK procedures registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were assessed (n=752). Univariable and multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression. The effect of rebubbling on endothelial cell density was analysed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: 144 of 752 (19%) eyes underwent rebubbling. Rebubbling was successful in 101 eyes (70%). In eyes that underwent rebubbling, the graft failure rate was significantly higher than eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (30% vs 9%, respectively; OR: 4.28, 95% CI 2.72 to 6.73, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for rebubbling were surgical complication (OR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.33, p=0.012) and older recipient age (OR: 1.04 (per increase of 1 year), 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07, p=0.003). Risk factors for developing graft failure within 3 months were transplant before 2016 (OR: 3.32, 95% CI 1.87 to 5.90, p<0.001), and surgical complication (OR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.04, p=0.004). Throughout the study period, rebubbling and early graft failure were inversely related. Eyes that underwent rebubbling showed significantly lower endothelial cell densities at 3, 6 and 12 months compared with eyes that did not undergo rebubbling (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This Dutch registry study identified independent risk factors for DMEK graft detachment leading to rebubbling, namely recipient age and surgical complication, and early graft failure, namely transplantation before 2016 and surgical complication. Rebubbling was associated with significantly higher endothelial cell loss in the first year after surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9763158/ /pubmed/33597192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317041 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Dunker, Suryan
Winkens, Bjorn
van den Biggelaar, Frank
Nuijts, Rudy
Kruit, Pieter Jan
Dickman, Mor
Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study
title Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study
title_full Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study
title_fullStr Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study
title_full_unstemmed Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study
title_short Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study
title_sort rebubbling and graft failure in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective dutch registry study
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33597192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317041
work_keys_str_mv AT dunkersuryan rebubblingandgraftfailureindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT winkensbjorn rebubblingandgraftfailureindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT vandenbiggelaarfrank rebubblingandgraftfailureindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT nuijtsrudy rebubblingandgraftfailureindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT kruitpieterjan rebubblingandgraftfailureindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT dickmanmor rebubblingandgraftfailureindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT rebubblingandgraftfailureindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastyaprospectivedutchregistrystudy