Cargando…

Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials

OBJECTIVE: INGR1D (INvestigating Genetic Risk for type 1 Diabetes) was a type 1 diabetes (T1D) genetic screening study established to identify participants for a primary prevention trial (POInT, Primary Oral Insulin Trial). METHODS: The majority of participants were recruited by research midwives in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bendor-Samuel, Owen Martyn, Wishlade, Tabitha, Willis, Louise, Aley, Parvinder, Choi, Edward, Craik, Rachel, Mujadidi, Yama, Mounce, Ginny, Roseman, Fenella, De La Horra Gozalo, Arancha, Bland, James, Taj, Nazia, Smith, Ian, Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele, Bonifacio, Ezio, Winkler, Christiane, Haupt, Florian, Todd, John A, Servais, Laurent, Snape, Matthew D, Vatish, Manu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-324270
_version_ 1784852993661730816
author Bendor-Samuel, Owen Martyn
Wishlade, Tabitha
Willis, Louise
Aley, Parvinder
Choi, Edward
Craik, Rachel
Mujadidi, Yama
Mounce, Ginny
Roseman, Fenella
De La Horra Gozalo, Arancha
Bland, James
Taj, Nazia
Smith, Ian
Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele
Bonifacio, Ezio
Winkler, Christiane
Haupt, Florian
Todd, John A
Servais, Laurent
Snape, Matthew D
Vatish, Manu
author_facet Bendor-Samuel, Owen Martyn
Wishlade, Tabitha
Willis, Louise
Aley, Parvinder
Choi, Edward
Craik, Rachel
Mujadidi, Yama
Mounce, Ginny
Roseman, Fenella
De La Horra Gozalo, Arancha
Bland, James
Taj, Nazia
Smith, Ian
Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele
Bonifacio, Ezio
Winkler, Christiane
Haupt, Florian
Todd, John A
Servais, Laurent
Snape, Matthew D
Vatish, Manu
author_sort Bendor-Samuel, Owen Martyn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: INGR1D (INvestigating Genetic Risk for type 1 Diabetes) was a type 1 diabetes (T1D) genetic screening study established to identify participants for a primary prevention trial (POInT, Primary Oral Insulin Trial). METHODS: The majority of participants were recruited by research midwives in antenatal clinics from 18 weeks’ gestation. Using the NHS Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NBSP) infrastructure, participants enrolled in INGR1D had an extra sample taken from their day 5 bloodspot card sent for T1D genetic screening. Those at an increased risk of T1D were informed of the result, given education about T1D and the opportunity to take part in POInT. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and November 2020, 66% of women approached about INGR1D chose to participate. 15 660 babies were enrolled into INGR1D and 14 731 blood samples were processed. Of the processed samples, 157 (1%) had confirmed positive results, indicating an increased risk of T1D, of whom a third (n=49) enrolled into POInT (20 families were unable to participate in POInT due to COVID-19 lockdown restrictions). CONCLUSION: The use of prospective consent to perform personalised genetic testing on samples obtained through the routine NBSP represents a novel mechanism for clinical genetic research in the UK and provides a model for further population-based genetic studies in the newborn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9763160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97631602022-12-21 Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials Bendor-Samuel, Owen Martyn Wishlade, Tabitha Willis, Louise Aley, Parvinder Choi, Edward Craik, Rachel Mujadidi, Yama Mounce, Ginny Roseman, Fenella De La Horra Gozalo, Arancha Bland, James Taj, Nazia Smith, Ian Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele Bonifacio, Ezio Winkler, Christiane Haupt, Florian Todd, John A Servais, Laurent Snape, Matthew D Vatish, Manu Arch Dis Child Original Research OBJECTIVE: INGR1D (INvestigating Genetic Risk for type 1 Diabetes) was a type 1 diabetes (T1D) genetic screening study established to identify participants for a primary prevention trial (POInT, Primary Oral Insulin Trial). METHODS: The majority of participants were recruited by research midwives in antenatal clinics from 18 weeks’ gestation. Using the NHS Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NBSP) infrastructure, participants enrolled in INGR1D had an extra sample taken from their day 5 bloodspot card sent for T1D genetic screening. Those at an increased risk of T1D were informed of the result, given education about T1D and the opportunity to take part in POInT. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and November 2020, 66% of women approached about INGR1D chose to participate. 15 660 babies were enrolled into INGR1D and 14 731 blood samples were processed. Of the processed samples, 157 (1%) had confirmed positive results, indicating an increased risk of T1D, of whom a third (n=49) enrolled into POInT (20 families were unable to participate in POInT due to COVID-19 lockdown restrictions). CONCLUSION: The use of prospective consent to perform personalised genetic testing on samples obtained through the routine NBSP represents a novel mechanism for clinical genetic research in the UK and provides a model for further population-based genetic studies in the newborn. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9763160/ /pubmed/36171064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-324270 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Bendor-Samuel, Owen Martyn
Wishlade, Tabitha
Willis, Louise
Aley, Parvinder
Choi, Edward
Craik, Rachel
Mujadidi, Yama
Mounce, Ginny
Roseman, Fenella
De La Horra Gozalo, Arancha
Bland, James
Taj, Nazia
Smith, Ian
Ziegler, Anette-Gabriele
Bonifacio, Ezio
Winkler, Christiane
Haupt, Florian
Todd, John A
Servais, Laurent
Snape, Matthew D
Vatish, Manu
Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials
title Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials
title_full Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials
title_fullStr Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials
title_short Successful integration of newborn genetic testing into UK routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials
title_sort successful integration of newborn genetic testing into uk routine screening using prospective consent to determine eligibility for clinical trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-324270
work_keys_str_mv AT bendorsamuelowenmartyn successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT wishladetabitha successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT willislouise successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT aleyparvinder successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT choiedward successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT craikrachel successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT mujadidiyama successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT mounceginny successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT rosemanfenella successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT delahorragozaloarancha successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT blandjames successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT tajnazia successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT smithian successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT ziegleranettegabriele successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT bonifacioezio successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT winklerchristiane successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT hauptflorian successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT toddjohna successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT servaislaurent successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT snapematthewd successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT vatishmanu successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials
AT successfulintegrationofnewborngenetictestingintoukroutinescreeningusingprospectiveconsenttodetermineeligibilityforclinicaltrials