Cargando…
Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment
BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of 20 miles per hour (mph) speed limit interventions is limited, and rarely have long-term outcomes been assessed. We investigate the effect of a 20 mph speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume at 1 and 3 years...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36379715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219729 |
_version_ | 1784853008640638976 |
---|---|
author | Hunter, Ruth F Cleland, Claire L Busby, John Nightingale, Glenna Kee, Frank Williams, Andrew James Kelly, Paul Kelly, Michael P Milton, Karen Kokka, Kelly Jepson, Ruth |
author_facet | Hunter, Ruth F Cleland, Claire L Busby, John Nightingale, Glenna Kee, Frank Williams, Andrew James Kelly, Paul Kelly, Michael P Milton, Karen Kokka, Kelly Jepson, Ruth |
author_sort | Hunter, Ruth F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of 20 miles per hour (mph) speed limit interventions is limited, and rarely have long-term outcomes been assessed. We investigate the effect of a 20 mph speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume at 1 and 3 years post-implementation. METHODS: An observational, repeated cross-sectional design was implemented, using routinely collected data for road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume. We evaluated difference-in-differences in collisions and casualties (intervention vs control) across three different time series and traffic speed and volume pre-implementation, at 1 and 3 years post-implementation. RESULTS: Small reductions in road traffic collisions were observed at year 1 (3%; p=0.82) and year 3 post-implementation (15%; p=0.31) at the intervention site. Difference-in-differences analyses showed no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control sites over time for road traffic collisions. There were 16% (p=0.18) and 22% (p=0.06) reductions in casualty rates at years 1 and 3 post-implementation, respectively, at the intervention site. Results showed little change in mean traffic speed at year 1 (0.2 mph, 95% CI −0.3 to 2.4, p=0.14) and year 3 post-implementation (0.8, 95% CI −1.5 to 2.5, p=0.17). For traffic volume, a decrease in 57 vehicles per week was observed at year 1 (95% CI –162 to −14, p<0.00) and 71 vehicles at year 3 (95% CI −213 to 1, p=0.05) post-implementation. CONCLUSION: A 20 mph speed limit intervention implemented at city centre scale had little impact on long-term outcomes including road traffic collisions, casualties and speed, except for a reduction in traffic volume. Policymakers considering implementing 20 mph speed limit interventions should consider the fidelity, context and scale of implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9763225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97632252022-12-21 Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment Hunter, Ruth F Cleland, Claire L Busby, John Nightingale, Glenna Kee, Frank Williams, Andrew James Kelly, Paul Kelly, Michael P Milton, Karen Kokka, Kelly Jepson, Ruth J Epidemiol Community Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of 20 miles per hour (mph) speed limit interventions is limited, and rarely have long-term outcomes been assessed. We investigate the effect of a 20 mph speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume at 1 and 3 years post-implementation. METHODS: An observational, repeated cross-sectional design was implemented, using routinely collected data for road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume. We evaluated difference-in-differences in collisions and casualties (intervention vs control) across three different time series and traffic speed and volume pre-implementation, at 1 and 3 years post-implementation. RESULTS: Small reductions in road traffic collisions were observed at year 1 (3%; p=0.82) and year 3 post-implementation (15%; p=0.31) at the intervention site. Difference-in-differences analyses showed no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control sites over time for road traffic collisions. There were 16% (p=0.18) and 22% (p=0.06) reductions in casualty rates at years 1 and 3 post-implementation, respectively, at the intervention site. Results showed little change in mean traffic speed at year 1 (0.2 mph, 95% CI −0.3 to 2.4, p=0.14) and year 3 post-implementation (0.8, 95% CI −1.5 to 2.5, p=0.17). For traffic volume, a decrease in 57 vehicles per week was observed at year 1 (95% CI –162 to −14, p<0.00) and 71 vehicles at year 3 (95% CI −213 to 1, p=0.05) post-implementation. CONCLUSION: A 20 mph speed limit intervention implemented at city centre scale had little impact on long-term outcomes including road traffic collisions, casualties and speed, except for a reduction in traffic volume. Policymakers considering implementing 20 mph speed limit interventions should consider the fidelity, context and scale of implementation. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9763225/ /pubmed/36379715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219729 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hunter, Ruth F Cleland, Claire L Busby, John Nightingale, Glenna Kee, Frank Williams, Andrew James Kelly, Paul Kelly, Michael P Milton, Karen Kokka, Kelly Jepson, Ruth Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment |
title | Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment |
title_full | Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment |
title_fullStr | Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment |
title_short | Investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in Belfast, UK: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment |
title_sort | investigating the impact of a 20 miles per hour speed limit intervention on road traffic collisions, casualties, speed and volume in belfast, uk: 3 year follow-up outcomes of a natural experiment |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36379715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hunterruthf investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT clelandclairel investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT busbyjohn investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT nightingaleglenna investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT keefrank investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT williamsandrewjames investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT kellypaul investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT kellymichaelp investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT miltonkaren investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT kokkakelly investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment AT jepsonruth investigatingtheimpactofa20milesperhourspeedlimitinterventiononroadtrafficcollisionscasualtiesspeedandvolumeinbelfastuk3yearfollowupoutcomesofanaturalexperiment |