Cargando…

Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation

INTRODUCTION: Oocyte cryopreservation is a valid option for female cancer patients to preserve fertility. The number of patients undergoing fertility preservation (FP) cycles has increased over the past years. Nevertheless, the rates of patients returning to use their cryopreserved material have sho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Immediata, Valentina, Cirillo, Federico, Baggiani, Annamaria, Zanagnolo, Maria Federica, Ronchetti, Camilla, Morenghi, Emanuela, Cesana, Amalia, Specchia, Cristina, Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1054123
_version_ 1784853061725847552
author Immediata, Valentina
Cirillo, Federico
Baggiani, Annamaria
Zanagnolo, Maria Federica
Ronchetti, Camilla
Morenghi, Emanuela
Cesana, Amalia
Specchia, Cristina
Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
author_facet Immediata, Valentina
Cirillo, Federico
Baggiani, Annamaria
Zanagnolo, Maria Federica
Ronchetti, Camilla
Morenghi, Emanuela
Cesana, Amalia
Specchia, Cristina
Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
author_sort Immediata, Valentina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Oocyte cryopreservation is a valid option for female cancer patients to preserve fertility. The number of patients undergoing fertility preservation (FP) cycles has increased over the past years. Nevertheless, the rates of patients returning to use their cryopreserved material have shown to be considerably low, ranging from 5-8%, but significant data regarding the reasons of such low return rates are scarce. METHODS: This study is a single-center follow-up retrospective study evaluating the return rate of oncological women who underwent FP at a tertiary care Fertility Center and assessing the reasons influencing the patients who did not return. Data about patients who returned to attempt pregnancy were retrieved from internal registries. Non-returned patients were assessed with a standardized phone survey investigating health condition, marital status and family projects, spontaneous conceptions, and the reasons why they had not returned to use their gametes. A univariate analysis between returned and non-returned patients was performed. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients who received counseling about FP, 171 (43.1%) underwent oocyte cryopreservation between 2001 and 2017. Nine (5%) died, and 17 (10%) were lost at follow-up. A total of 20 patients (11.7%) returned and 125 did not. In the non-returned group, 37 (29.6%) did not have a partner, 10 (8%) had a previous spontaneous conception, and 15 (12%) had recurrent malignancy at the time of follow-up. In the univariate analysis, younger age at freezing (31.8±6.2 vs. 35.2±4.7; p 0.018), lack of a partner (p 0.002), type of cancer (other than breast cancer; p 0.024) were the significant factors in the non-returned group. As for the personal reason for not coming back, patients mainly answered as follows: lack of a partner (29, 23.2%), the desire for spontaneous motherhood (24, 19.2%), previous spontaneous pregnancies after FP procedures (16, 12.8%), and still ongoing hormonal therapy for breast cancer (13, 10.4%). All patients confirmed their will to keep the storage of their oocytes. DISCUSSION: The impact of a cancer diagnosis on a woman’s maternal desire, sentimental status and life priorities should be studied more thoroughly. Studies investigating hormonal therapy suppression in breast cancer patients seeking pregnancy should be encouraged. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05223764.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9763445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97634452022-12-21 Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation Immediata, Valentina Cirillo, Federico Baggiani, Annamaria Zanagnolo, Maria Federica Ronchetti, Camilla Morenghi, Emanuela Cesana, Amalia Specchia, Cristina Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Oocyte cryopreservation is a valid option for female cancer patients to preserve fertility. The number of patients undergoing fertility preservation (FP) cycles has increased over the past years. Nevertheless, the rates of patients returning to use their cryopreserved material have shown to be considerably low, ranging from 5-8%, but significant data regarding the reasons of such low return rates are scarce. METHODS: This study is a single-center follow-up retrospective study evaluating the return rate of oncological women who underwent FP at a tertiary care Fertility Center and assessing the reasons influencing the patients who did not return. Data about patients who returned to attempt pregnancy were retrieved from internal registries. Non-returned patients were assessed with a standardized phone survey investigating health condition, marital status and family projects, spontaneous conceptions, and the reasons why they had not returned to use their gametes. A univariate analysis between returned and non-returned patients was performed. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients who received counseling about FP, 171 (43.1%) underwent oocyte cryopreservation between 2001 and 2017. Nine (5%) died, and 17 (10%) were lost at follow-up. A total of 20 patients (11.7%) returned and 125 did not. In the non-returned group, 37 (29.6%) did not have a partner, 10 (8%) had a previous spontaneous conception, and 15 (12%) had recurrent malignancy at the time of follow-up. In the univariate analysis, younger age at freezing (31.8±6.2 vs. 35.2±4.7; p 0.018), lack of a partner (p 0.002), type of cancer (other than breast cancer; p 0.024) were the significant factors in the non-returned group. As for the personal reason for not coming back, patients mainly answered as follows: lack of a partner (29, 23.2%), the desire for spontaneous motherhood (24, 19.2%), previous spontaneous pregnancies after FP procedures (16, 12.8%), and still ongoing hormonal therapy for breast cancer (13, 10.4%). All patients confirmed their will to keep the storage of their oocytes. DISCUSSION: The impact of a cancer diagnosis on a woman’s maternal desire, sentimental status and life priorities should be studied more thoroughly. Studies investigating hormonal therapy suppression in breast cancer patients seeking pregnancy should be encouraged. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05223764. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9763445/ /pubmed/36561560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1054123 Text en Copyright © 2022 Immediata, Cirillo, Baggiani, Zanagnolo, Ronchetti, Morenghi, Cesana, Specchia and Levi-Setti https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Immediata, Valentina
Cirillo, Federico
Baggiani, Annamaria
Zanagnolo, Maria Federica
Ronchetti, Camilla
Morenghi, Emanuela
Cesana, Amalia
Specchia, Cristina
Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele
Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation
title Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation
title_full Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation
title_fullStr Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation
title_full_unstemmed Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation
title_short Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation
title_sort why are they not coming back? a single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte’s storing for fertility preservation
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1054123
work_keys_str_mv AT immediatavalentina whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT cirillofederico whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT baggianiannamaria whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT zanagnolomariafederica whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT ronchetticamilla whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT morenghiemanuela whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT cesanaamalia whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT specchiacristina whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation
AT levisettipaoloemanuele whyaretheynotcomingbackasinglecenterfollowupstudyononcologicalwomenoocytesstoringforfertilitypreservation